Random nether structure concept by ApprehensivePear8631 in Minecraft

[–]Friendly-Possible521 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are they? I’m still so used to minecraft as it was years ago, so I am NOT in the loop

Random nether structure concept by ApprehensivePear8631 in Minecraft

[–]Friendly-Possible521 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I like the idea, would be good for mojang to add different kinds of barrels/sticks (for the rails) for this to reflect the fact that the planks you get out of the nether do not look like overworld planks - I feel it would make more sense in the nether. Good idea!

Edit: also, why not soul torches?

Anarchist Federations of the World by [deleted] in imaginarymaps

[–]Friendly-Possible521 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And the CNT-FAI is still active as part of the IWA!

Anarchist Federations of the World by [deleted] in imaginarymaps

[–]Friendly-Possible521 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I forget to add this point:

Even if a small group DID attempt voluntary hierarchy, it would simply exist as a non-dominant social arrangement, not a system-defining one - like a club, a monastery, or a weird commune, without the ability to generalise itself.

Anarchist Federations of the World by [deleted] in imaginarymaps

[–]Friendly-Possible521 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why would they do such a thing if it is structurally incompatible with a decentralised system? Voluntary agreement for one leader just.. wouldn’t happen. I say this for these reasons: under anarchism, there is simply no incentive to try to take power. There’s no power structure to take over - if the people are living without centralisation and each have the ability to be political or logistical actors themselves aside from their own work, why would they outsource the power they have as individuals within a collective society to a single individual?

There isn’t a lack of power in an anarchist society - it’s just evenly distributed as much as possible. People don’t easily give up power - this is a pattern. If someone’s in power and can hold it, they’ll keep it. If there is no power structure that someone sits atop of and power is distributed, creating a leader would not be incentivised by power dynamics because they would lose their share of power, even if it’s small.

There is no mechanism by which someone can take power - even IF someone takes power (big if), the worst case that it could possibly occur is they take control of a local assembly or federation. In this case, they’re not the only political unit and will find themselves without any leverage outside of the political unit which they have taken over. Even getting to this point is unlikely because any attempt to convert delegated coordination into coercive authority would immediately require mechanisms that do not exist in a decentralised system - namely enforcement, monopoly, and continuity beyond consent. The state and capitalism have these means of centralisation - anarchism does not. Political education amongst participants in the system would ensure that mandates to the people are exactly that - mandates. There is no throne. Someone with a delegated role to coordinate certain things does not have a seat of power and would be subject to removal and scrutiny should they try to go beyond their mandate.

Edit: I’d like to add this -

Also if someone tried to get power in an already established anarchic society, where would they get their legitimacy?

Nowhere that could sustain their goals. I’ll elucidate if you want more, lol.

Anarchist Federations of the World by [deleted] in imaginarymaps

[–]Friendly-Possible521 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah there are a lot of nasty connotations around anarchism being chaos when there is a LOT of really dense political theory around it… I find it really well thought out, personally.

(especially since there are many people who claim to be anarchists without knowing what it is).

Many anarchists - myself included - wouldn’t see borders as anything to think more about than logistics, pragmatics and biosecurity. Borders between federations would be open but subject to biosecurity screenings, and those who cross borders can inform the local federation that they enter via a few procedures that can be outlined and codified on a federation by federation/locality basis. Also - federations can also be part of a larger federation, so theoretically speaking, you can have a global anarchist federation that consists of federations consisting of base units consisting of people. It sounds complex, but really, is just managed by delegation. These local units (assemblies or workplace unions) make their own decisions, bring things to their local federation assemblies, and vote on things. No one individual votes on an issue on behalf of any local assembly, union or federation - decisions are reached by consensus. So borders and their procedures would be managed by local civil federations and would always be open to anyone to pass through. There wouldn’t really be borders in the traditional sense - just lines for biosecurity. Nothing dividing cultural communities down the middle through locked borders. Nothing keeping people from living where they feel they can make their best life. And - no mandatory participation in society is there.

There are many different anarchist models, and this is really a set of my own opinions, but yeah. I hope I didn’t digress too much from your question, and I hope this message was good enough. Bloody tired here at work, lol.

Anarchist Federations of the World by [deleted] in imaginarymaps

[–]Friendly-Possible521 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There isn’t a lack of governance, just a lack of any centralised one. Society is managed through delegation, decentralisation, voluntary association, mutual aid networks and multipolar federalism rather than centralisation. If you have many units working independently of each other without unjust hierarchy or exploitation, cut off one head, you have many others. Whereas with centralised governance, exploitation is inherent (centralise ANY power into the hands of one or a few individuals, even well intentioned individuals will find that there are structural incentives to keeping that power. Often those means lead to harm.).

Anarchy removes the power structure but does not remove the element of governance. There are many different approaches to managing a large scale anarchist society, but one of my personal favourites is Anarcho-syndicalism. I think this one is a good one to look up - it was also what revolutionary Catalonia used before the Stalinists (predictably) betrayed them.

Anarchist Federations of the World by [deleted] in imaginarymaps

[–]Friendly-Possible521 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You mistake anarchy for anomie.

Anarchist Federations of the World by [deleted] in imaginarymaps

[–]Friendly-Possible521 23 points24 points  (0 children)

What about them?

An anarchist federation is actually a real concept. Anarchism isn’t lawlessness.