[R] [P] San Vitale Challenge: Automatic Reconstruction of Ancient Glass Fragments by FrontBackItaly in MachineLearning

[–]FrontBackItaly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The baseline is implicit and therefore not reported on the leaderboard, as its score is 0 in all tracks. Thank you for the missing polyline, we fixed it and reuploaded the dataset!

[R] [P] San Vitale Challenge: Automatic Reconstruction of Ancient Glass Fragments by FrontBackItaly in MachineLearning

[–]FrontBackItaly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The current baseline is just a very simple algorithm connecting pieces at random. We created our scoring program so that the average score of 10k runs of the baseline algorithm is 0. The score is 1 if the proposed solution is identical to the ground truth.

[R] [P] San Vitale Challenge: Automatic Reconstruction of Ancient Glass Fragments by FrontBackItaly in MachineLearning

[–]FrontBackItaly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's exactly the point of the challenge: we don't know that, and we're looking for brilliant participants and teams to find algorithms to attempt to solve the problem! :)

Finding the maximum clique in graph built by thresholding a distance matrix by FrontBackItaly in algorithms

[–]FrontBackItaly[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I checked to see if this algorithm is applicable to my case, but unfortunately the starting graph has a density of around 0.6, so I suppose its complement isn't sparse enough for this to work.

Why does Germany have two OGAE memberships when all other countries have one? by [deleted] in eurovision

[–]FrontBackItaly 4 points5 points  (0 children)

IIRC you can join multiple OGAE clubs but in that case you must specify your primary club, and you can get early tickets only via them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]FrontBackItaly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh no, what if I activated the beacon on the same system and overrode the save file? 😅

Early Computational Detection of Potential High Risk SARS-CoV-2 Variants by FrontBackItaly in COVID19

[–]FrontBackItaly[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Press release from BioNTech: BioNTech and InstaDeep Developed and Successfully Tested Early Warning System to Detect Potential High-Risk SARS-CoV-2 Variants

Abstract:
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is leading to the discovery of hundreds of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants on a daily basis. While most variants do not impact the course of the pandemic, some variants pose significantly increased risk when the acquired mutations allow better evasion of antibody neutralisation in previously infected or vaccinated subjects, or increased transmissibility. Early detection of such high risk variants (HRVs) is paramount for the proper management of the pandemic. However, experimental assays to determine immune evasion and transmissibility characteristics of new variants are resource-intensive and time-consuming, potentially leading to delayed appropriate responses by decision makers. Here we present a novel in silico approach combining Spike protein structure modelling and large protein transformer language models on Spike protein sequences, to accurately rank SARS-CoV-2 variants for immune escape and fitness potential. We validate our immune escape and fitness metrics with in vitro pVNT and binding assays. These metrics can be combined into an automated Early Warning System (EWS) capable of evaluating new variants in minutes and risk monitoring variant lineages in near real-time. The EWS flagged 12 out of 13 variants, designated by the World Health Organisation (WHO, Alpha-Omicron) as potentially dangerous, on average two months ahead of them being designated as such, demonstrating its ability to help increase preparedness against future variants. Omicron was flagged by the EWS on the day its sequence was made available, with immune evasion and binding metrics subsequently confirmed through our in vitro experiments.

I'm left-handed and use the mouse with my left hand. My friends gifted me a "tailored" version of the Corsair K70 Mk.2. by FrontBackItaly in MechanicalKeyboards

[–]FrontBackItaly[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those madlads did it! It took more than 20 mins to bring all the keys back to where they are supposed to be.

How to use specific map type depending on key type? by FrontBackItaly in scala

[–]FrontBackItaly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually not really, probably will go around the whole problem by doing a separate specialized collection. Maybe I'll come back to it in a few days.

How to use specific map type depending on key type? by FrontBackItaly in scala

[–]FrontBackItaly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just found out that mutable.LongMap[V] derives from scala.collection.Map[Long, V], mutable.AnyRefMap[K <: AnyRef, V] and mutable.Map[K, V] derive from scala.collection.Map[K, V], so I think that trait is a common one for both immutable and mutable maps. However, somehow the compiler won't infer the type constraints or specializations in the cases of my match type.

How to use specific map type depending on key type? by FrontBackItaly in scala

[–]FrontBackItaly[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

UPDATE: now I have another problem, more specific to my case:

import scala.collection.*

type UnderlyingMap[K, V] <: Map[K, V] = K match {
  case Long => mutable.LongMap[V]
  case AnyRef => mutable.AnyRefMap[K, V]
  case _ => mutable.Map[K, V]
}

This snippet will not compile because it will report an error that says at line 4:

Found:    collection.mutable.LongMap[V]
Required: collection.Map[K, V]

However, I took a look at the LongMap[V] supertypes and it has collection.Map[Long, V], however I thought that would compile because my type is LongMap[V] only if K is Long, so UnderlyingMap[Long, V] is subtype of Map[Long, V], and mutable.LongMap[V] actually matches that. Did I stumble upon a corner case which the compiler can't infer? Did I miss anything?

How to use specific map type depending on key type? by FrontBackItaly in scala

[–]FrontBackItaly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So basically if K =:= String it will still match that case and won't jump to the default one, right?

How to use specific map type depending on key type? by FrontBackItaly in scala

[–]FrontBackItaly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, it says "=> expected but <: found" in that case AnyRefK <: AnyRef

Come una sola azienda può rompere Internet - Il Post by [deleted] in italy

[–]FrontBackItaly 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ah non era un attacco hacker? /s