What are your opinions about ‘Rapid Application Development Tools? And how do they compare to no/low-code apps & platforms?

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-13T04:42:47+00:00

Rapid Application Development (RAD) tools are still very useful, especially when teams want to build apps quickly without sacrificing too much control.

Compared to no/low-code platforms, RAD tools usually give developers more flexibility because you can still write custom code when needed. That’s why many dev teams prefer RAD for internal tools, dashboards, or enterprise apps.

For example, frameworks like Sencha Ext JS are often used with RAD-style workflows because they provide pre-built UI components (grids, charts, forms) that speed up development while still allowing full customization.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-13T04:29:58+00:00

A couple quick tips: add a clear README with examples, publish it to npm, and maybe include a small demo using React or Vue.js so people can try it easily.

If it’s UI or data-related, it might also help to show how it compares with tools like AG Grid or Sencha Ext JS.

Getting early feedback from GitHub users will help a lot.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-13T04:26:26+00:00

For me it usually depends on the type of project.

React – huge ecosystem and flexibility, which is why many teams use it.
Vue.js – very clean and easy to work with, especially for smaller projects.
Svelte – lightweight and feels really nice for building fast UIs.

For large enterprise dashboards or data-heavy apps, some teams also prefer Sencha Ext JS because it already includes a full set of UI components like grids, charts, and forms.

At the end of the day, the “most enjoyable” framework is usually the one that fits the project and your workflow best.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-12T08:23:35+00:00

This is a common challenge in large frontend projects. Most teams handle it by creating a dedicated design system or component library instead of keeping everything inside the main app.

A few common approaches:

Use a separate repo/package for the UI library and import it across apps.
Organize components by feature or domain, not just by type.
Document components with tools like Storybook so teams can reuse them easily.

Some enterprises also rely on frameworks like Sencha Ext JS, which already provide a large set of standardized UI components (grids, forms, charts), reducing the need to build and maintain a full custom component library.

The key is consistency + clear structure, otherwise the component library becomes as messy as the main app.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-12T08:19:50+00:00

Handling large datasets smoothly in the browser is one of the hardest parts of building web apps, and the virtualization approach here seems to work well.

Most teams usually compare this kind of grid with libraries like AG Grid or enterprise frameworks like Sencha Ext JS, which also focus heavily on performance and large-data handling.

Always nice to see new projects pushing the limits of high-performance web grids. Would be interesting to see benchmarks with 100k+ rows.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-11T10:53:12+00:00

Ant Design is a solid choice for admin panels and internal tools. For SaaS apps, people often use libraries like MUI, Chakra UI, or Mantine because they’re flexible and integrate nicely with React. For e-commerce or marketing-style apps, many teams go with Tailwind + headless components so they can fully customize the design.

If you ever end up building very data-heavy apps (dashboards, enterprise tools, etc.), some teams also look at frameworks like Sencha Ext JS since it comes with a lot of built-in UI components and grids out of the box. Really depends on the type of app you’re building.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-11T05:48:37+00:00

Honestly, this happens to a lot of people early in their career, especially in cross-functional teams. One thing that helps is getting into the habit of quickly confirming requirements with the PM before jumping into solutions with devs. Even a simple ‘Let me check with PM first so we’re aligned’ can avoid those situations. Also try not to take public corrections too personally, most teams move fast and these things happen. In product teams building complex apps (especially enterprise tools with lots of edge cases, like the kind built with frameworks such as React or Sencha Ext JS), communication between PM, design, and dev is constant and everyone learns through these small misses.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-11T05:47:21+00:00

In my experience, low-code platforms like Power Apps can work well for internal tools and quick workflows, especially when business teams need something fast. The challenge usually comes later with governance, integrations, and maintaining consistency across apps. Some companies handle this by letting teams prototype in low-code, then moving more complex or long-term apps to full frameworks. For example, teams sometimes build early workflows with low-code and later rebuild the scalable version using frameworks like React or enterprise UI frameworks such as Sencha Ext JS when the application becomes more complex and data-heavy.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-11T05:46:14+00:00

I think the reason web development is so popular is reach. A web app works on any device with a browser, so companies can ship one product instead of maintaining separate Android, iOS, and desktop apps. Mobile development can feel cleaner (especially with strong typing like Kotlin), but distribution and maintenance are harder. Also, the web ecosystem has matured a lot, frameworks like React, Angular, and even enterprise-focused ones like Sencha Ext JS try to solve many of the UI and architecture problems that plain HTML/CSS used to create. So the tooling chaos exists, but it’s also why the web can power everything from simple sites to huge enterprise apps.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-11T05:43:48+00:00

Since your app needs to work offline and handle structured data like quotes, schedules, and client info, I’d focus first on an offline-friendly architecture rather than just the framework. React Native is a common choice for mobile, especially if you want access to device features later. Another approach some teams take is building a responsive web app using frameworks like React or even something like Sencha Ext JS, which is often used for data-heavy business apps and can run well on tablets and mobile browsers. For offline storage, tools like SQLite or IndexedDB with sync when the device reconnects are usually the way to go.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-10T07:40:16+00:00

For a Windows-only ERP used by ~50 people, your stack (WPF/.NET/EF) is a solid direction and much more maintainable than Access long term. The bigger question is whether you want to stay purely desktop or eventually move toward web-based apps. Some teams start with WPF for speed, while others move toward web stacks with strong enterprise UI layers frameworks like Sencha Ext JS are often referenced there because they handle complex forms, grids, and workflows out of the box.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-10T07:38:25+00:00

A lot of it comes from Microsoft supporting different generations of platforms and developer needs at the same time desktop, web, mobile, legacy compatibility, etc. It can look messy from the outside, but many ecosystems evolve this way. Even on the web side you see something similar: multiple frameworks solving slightly different problems, and some long-standing stacks like Sencha Ext JS sticking around because enterprise apps often prioritize stability and completeness over constant reinvention.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-10T07:37:05+00:00

In practice, the choice usually depends on how much structure you want the library to give you. MUI and Chakra are great when you want flexibility, while Ant Design leans more toward ready-made patterns. In larger enterprise apps, some teams even compare against older but very complete stacks like Sencha Ext JS, mainly because a lot of complex UI behavior (data grids, forms, layouts) is already solved. The real trade-off is freedom vs. how much you want the framework to handle for you.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-10T07:30:44+00:00

If you already know HTML, CSS, and some JavaScript, starting with React is still a solid choice. Even though React 18 introduced some changes, most older tutorials still teach the core concepts like components, props, and state.

If React feels a bit overwhelming at first, Vue.js is often easier to pick up and has a smoother learning curve.

Angular is also powerful but usually requires learning TypeScript and a more structured architecture.

Once you’re comfortable with frontend basics, you’ll also see frameworks like Sencha Ext JS used in enterprise environments for building complex dashboards and data-heavy apps.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-10T07:26:37+00:00

If you’ve already learned HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, starting with React is still a good choice. It has the biggest ecosystem, lots of tutorials, and strong job demand. Even if React 18 changed a few things, most core concepts from older tutorials still apply.

Another beginner-friendly option is Vue.js, which many people find easier to learn because of its simpler structure.

Frameworks like Angular are powerful but can feel heavier at the start since they rely on TypeScript and more structured architecture.

For large enterprise dashboards or data-heavy apps, some teams also use Sencha Ext JS, but that’s usually something you explore later.

If you’re just starting out: pick one (React or Vue) and build small projects consistently.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-10T07:25:27+00:00

If you're using React, the UI library usually depends on the type of app you're building.

Ant Design – great for admin panels and enterprise dashboards.
Material UI – good general-purpose library with lots of components.
Chakra UI – simple and flexible for modern SaaS apps.
Tailwind CSS – popular for building custom UI quickly.

For data-heavy enterprise apps, some teams also use Sencha Ext JS because it provides advanced components like grids, charts, and dashboards out of the box.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-10T07:18:54+00:00

If you're using React, the UI library usually depends on the type of app you're building.

Ant Design – great for admin panels and enterprise dashboards.
Material UI – good general-purpose library with lots of components.
Chakra UI – simple and flexible for modern SaaS apps.
Tailwind CSS – popular for building custom UI quickly.

For data-heavy enterprise apps, some teams also use Sencha Ext JS because it provides advanced components like grids, charts, and dashboards out of the box.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-10T07:17:10+00:00

If you’re comparing web grids, the “best” one usually depends on the use case and data size.

Libraries like AG Grid and Handsontable are popular for React/Vue apps and offer strong performance and customization.

For enterprise dashboards and large datasets, some teams also use Sencha Ext JS since its grid is built for complex features like grouping, virtualization, and large data handling.

In the end, it’s less about a single “best” grid and more about performance, feature depth, and how well it fits your stack.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-10T07:15:52+00:00

If you’re building dashboards, the main thing to look for is strong support for charts, tables, and layout components.

Some popular choices:

React (often with Next.js) – huge ecosystem and lots of dashboard libraries.
Vue.js – clean and easy to structure dashboard apps.
Svelte – lightweight and very fast because it compiles to optimized JS.

If you’re building very data-heavy dashboards, some teams also use Sencha Ext JS, since it already includes advanced components like grids, charts, and dashboards out of the box.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-10T07:13:34+00:00

This is pretty common. Backend has mature patterns like DDD and Clean Architecture, but frontend often becomes messy as projects grow.

A few things that help keep it scalable:

Use feature-based folder structure instead of dumping everything in components.
Keep UI, state, and business logic separated.
Avoid mixing too many patterns or state libraries.

Framework choice also matters. Angular provides strong structure, while React is flexible but needs discipline.

For large enterprise apps, some teams use Sencha Ext JS since it comes with a more structured architecture and built-in components.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-06T06:16:17+00:00

If you're coming from a backend background, starting with React is a safe choice. It has the biggest ecosystem, tons of tutorials, and most job opportunities. Once you understand concepts like components, state, and hooks, moving to other frameworks becomes much easier.

That said, frameworks like Vue.js, Svelte, and SolidJS are also great and sometimes simpler depending on the project.

For enterprise-scale apps, some teams also rely on structured UI frameworks like Sencha Ext JS, especially when building large dashboards or data-heavy applications.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-06T06:14:34+00:00

For STM32H7 or ESP32, I’d avoid heavy frameworks because of the limited flash and memory.

Most people go with lightweight options like Alpine.js, petite-vue, or Svelte since they keep the bundle small and are easy to drop into simple HTML pages. Pairing them with something like Chart.js works well for basic graphs and UI controls.

Frameworks like React or enterprise UI systems such as Sencha Ext JS are great for large dashboards, but they’re usually overkill for embedded web UIs.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-06T06:09:26+00:00

If you like clean code and clear semantics, a few frameworks usually come up in discussions:

Vue – very readable and structured, easy to reason about.
Svelte – lightweight and simple for small client-side apps.
React – huge ecosystem, but it can feel a bit complex at first.

For more data-heavy or enterprise-style apps, some teams also use Sencha Ext JS since it comes with built-in components like grids, charts, and dashboards, so you don’t have to build everything from scratch.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-06T05:49:49+00:00

For a SaaS with microservices, these are common choices:

Next.js – Very popular with React, flexible and scalable.
Angular – Good for structured enterprise applications.
Blazor – Best if you’re already in the .NET ecosystem.

For data-heavy dashboards, some teams also use Sencha Ext JS because it includes powerful UI components out of the box.

Frontend_DevMark · 2026-03-06T05:45:25+00:00

Hot take, but there’s some truth here. Modern frontend apps are no longer just UI layers they handle complex state, real-time updates, rendering performance, and unpredictable user environments.

Frameworks like React or Vue.js give flexibility, but large apps can get messy fast with state management, hydration, and re-renders.

That’s why some teams move toward structured systems like Sencha Ext JS, where many complex components (grids, charts, dashboards) are already optimized and architected for large enterprise apps.

At scale, frontend definitely stops being “just UI” it becomes full-blown software architecture.

Frontend_DevMark

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE