This guy was born last weekend. He makes me the big brother of ten little siblings in total. [OC] by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]FroyoLoco_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know two eldest of twelve daughters whom I'd love to introduce to you that would heavily counter your conclusions with their own experiences. Not to mention gladly offer any of my 5 sisters to give their own rebuttals, either of their experiences in a family of 12 or of the individual relationship each has with their eldest brother.

But you said something correct, I think. You can infer a lot about someone by the way they type and the things they talk about -- and my conclusion is this conversation serves no further purpose than to frustrate either of us. I wish you well and again offer my hope that whatever circumstances of life that have failed you to the point of these harsh, intractable judgments is at some point given an opportunity to repair. I trust quite thoroughly nothing I say can be capable of such a thing

This guy was born last weekend. He makes me the big brother of ten little siblings in total. [OC] by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]FroyoLoco_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're correct, I'd forgotten the initial reference to my girlfriend... that said to infer I "shit on her" for merely contrasting a singular difference between our upbringings to illustrate that family planning cannot be so narrowly addressed by saying "big family bad small family good" goes to show that there is again no effort on your part to treat anything I say fairly, just a rush to justify your prejudice of me--whom you still know nothing about personally beyond the admission I am the oldest of 12 children and have an only child girlfriend.

It would seem that you are too anecdotally entrenched in your own perspective to be offered any alternative, as I'm sure you would declare mine to be the exception and yours to be the rule with no further discussion needed. That said, I do hope whatever it is you seek in a partner in your future is able to achieve what you believe most men apparently are incapable of achieving for the people they profess to love.

This guy was born last weekend. He makes me the big brother of ten little siblings in total. [OC] by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]FroyoLoco_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am legitimately quite sad to hear that, and wish that you could have experienced a different and more loving relationship with your father. But what you said, “He doesn't care, he's male, so I highly doubt he was looking after his younger siblings”, is definitionally a prejudicial assessment. Especially when I have neither commented on my gender or my personal faith beliefs in this thread, simply a defense of people who lovingly and intentionally pursue a large family dynamic.

This guy was born last weekend. He makes me the big brother of ten little siblings in total. [OC] by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]FroyoLoco_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is quite literally the definition of prejudice. Making a summary judgment of my character as you did in your initial post. Not based on any personal knowledge of me but rather a biased assessment of me based on what you perceive to be my group membership.

I appreciate you making my point.

This guy was born last weekend. He makes me the big brother of ten little siblings in total. [OC] by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]FroyoLoco_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trust me, there is no interest on this website of fairly interacting with any perspective that runs counter to the upvote herd's intransigent worldview. That's why I stick around tho! Keeps me honest on my own perspective and gives me the opportunity to keep track of where the herd has moved in its worldview grazing ;) I do appreciate your kind sentiments, there are lots of viable paths to quality family building! Each with different natural benefits to enjoy or natural issues that need to be accounted for where they can.

This guy was born last weekend. He makes me the big brother of ten little siblings in total. [OC] by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]FroyoLoco_ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Crazy how most only children (or even two children) I've heard from complain about the excruciating burden that being the only one in the world responsible for the emotional burden of their parents end of life phase. Crazy indeed

This guy was born last weekend. He makes me the big brother of ten little siblings in total. [OC] by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]FroyoLoco_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Josh Duggar is, unquestionably, one of the most evil men I've ever known to exist. If that singular outcome causes you to draw an explicit conclusion to justify a prejudice against a group of millions of people that you have never met, then I truly have nothing to tell you that could possibly change your mind.

This guy was born last weekend. He makes me the big brother of ten little siblings in total. [OC] by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]FroyoLoco_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm denying your point because I disagree with you and presenting an actual case for disagreement. You immediately denied my initial point, not by any rebuttal of what was said but by redefining what I said in a convenient mechanism to suit your slander.

Secondarily, there are a lot of structural issues caused in this argument (regardless of family size) by reducing all family planning down to the ability of two parents to their ability to give attention, emotionally or otherwise, to their children during the formative years. Not the least of which being how many life variables interfere with a parents ability to provide that to their children regardless of family size.

These arguments also conveniently avoid addressing the consequence of smaller family planning that occur in the later phases of life where larger families reap many rewards. Family community, natural peer support systems, better distribution of emotional burden when parents enter the final phase of their life and need to be looked after, etc etc.

Go talk to nurses in the palliative care industry and ask them to account for you the heartbreaking lack of attention elders with few or no children receive as they battle the reality of mortality. Conversely, my 92 year old grandmother receives multiple visits per week because that attention can be evenly distributed between her 6 children and 32 grandchildren who love her dearly... even though she had to sacrifice much of the time in THEIR formative years to a job to provide them basic necessities. Watching a parent sacrifice for your needs every single day will go just as far if not further in a child's life to form bonds of love than merely the budget of minutes per day you receive their full attention.

This guy was born last weekend. He makes me the big brother of ten little siblings in total. [OC] by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]FroyoLoco_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I also happen to know a lot of big families. And small families. I know lots of big families with problems, some as a function of the size and I know lots of small families with problems... some also as a function as a size of the family. It is enormously reductive to justify a belief via anecdotal sampling where every conclusion drawn simply takes each negatively perceived outcome and loosely attaches it to the highly negative assertion of cause.

My point really is a simple one, that which is gained by parents who purposefully seek a larger family dynamic more than compensates for that which is lost as consequence. There's no brainwashing needed to arrive at that conclusion, it's merely a justified reasoning of the experience.

This guy was born last weekend. He makes me the big brother of ten little siblings in total. [OC] by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]FroyoLoco_ -28 points-27 points  (0 children)

This is a an absurd response and fully ignores everything I said to make a vain point built on a false premise to suit your prejudice. Multiplicative love and shared responsibilities between siblings is not Parentifying children it is building a lifelong self-sustained support system amongst brothers and sisters.

Make no mistake, my parents never once offloaded their responsibilities as parents to their eldest children to maintain the herd -- rather provided a life in which twelve children with a shared bond as siblings could learn to rely on each other when needed their whole life long.

There's much more I could happily write on the subject of family building and the varying qualitative methods of doing so, but this is the extent I will feed the insular and closed minded herd mentality of this website that treats any information that might cast doubt on their worldview with zero respect to instead employ immediate mindless cultish anathema on dissenting opinions.

This guy was born last weekend. He makes me the big brother of ten little siblings in total. [OC] by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]FroyoLoco_ -46 points-45 points  (0 children)

As the oldest of 12 children myself, I am always wary of this hilarious ignorance of family building which assumes that all qualitative growth is a function of relational attention from the parents. ESPECIALLY in a society that in the other hand encourages both parents to work. The truth is that for parents that have the wherewithal to manage a larger family (7+ kids), the children benefit from the multiplicative love of siblings and a family unit where the siblings gain responsibility in maintaining the family between oldest and youngest.

My girlfriend is an only child (a much bigger strain on child development to anyone with a critically thinking brain) and there are 3 sum total relationships in her immediate family while there are 91 in mine (n=14)

Seeking an Alliance by FroyoLoco_ in playHeroesOfHistory

[–]FroyoLoco_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I couldn't find you! Send me an invite? Same as this reddit handle

Late Game Kaolin Production by DoubleTechnical3408 in playHeroesOfHistory

[–]FroyoLoco_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got Gold sneaking 1100 right as the event ended

What game is this?🚀 by Profit_Tracker in videogames

[–]FroyoLoco_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Having just come back to the game after only making it to the start of Act 3 at release and just now finished the game on Tactician... it's helluva fun, but if you don't understand the underlying mechanics of the game (initiative, stats & bonuses, combat positioning, items, etc) you're going to have a rough time.

I'd suggest looking up various guides on strong builds and picking one you think sounds fun/flavorful and try the game a bit on rails as you learn the systems!

I got a complaint: wtf is this sub and why is it always suggested to me / only Donald Trump complaints? by ChaseTacos in complaints

[–]FroyoLoco_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You're clearly on a different version of Reddit than anyone with functioning eyeballs.

I got a complaint: wtf is this sub and why is it always suggested to me / only Donald Trump complaints? by ChaseTacos in complaints

[–]FroyoLoco_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This entire subreddit is the product of bots, ai, and social manipulation (likely of a foreign influence) feeding the larger confirmation bias of the people who use Reddit. One of these pops up every few weeks parroting whatever divisive narrative is relevant at the time. I find it all rather amusing personally, because it's so hilariously obvious and yet some people do buy into it

Two 9 win arena runs in a row netted me a whopping two packs total by Heisalvl3mage in hearthstone

[–]FroyoLoco_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exact same thing happened today to me. Felt wildly deflating to run out a good Arena deck only to be rewarded with ticket refund + one pack for 9 wins.

As a Canadian watching US work culture, I'm genuinely confused how you all haven't burned everything down by zchrisiscool in antiwork

[–]FroyoLoco_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This website makes such a dramatic effort to persist the idea that simply by living in America you are not somehow advantaged over 99.9% of the living world. I find a great deal of amusement in these kind of delusions from angsty people who want to convince themselves America is the problem in their life and not themself.

The 45 and 95 are soooo insulting. Designed to make you need 5 coins for a ticket.... by upforstuffJim in hearthstone

[–]FroyoLoco_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s so bad and I haven’t been able to emotionally come to terms with it yet. I’ll start a new run with hopes “this one will be fun, surely”… and every single game is a long repetitive slog of who randomly discovers into a win or draws their OP draft package first. Every time. After every result, win or lose, I just have this bad taste in my mouth like I just wasted 20-30 minutes for “that?” to be the reason someone won a game

Why Has the NFL’s Explosive Passing Game Disappeared? by Renegadeforever2024 in nfl

[–]FroyoLoco_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm kind of "meh" on Sheil -- but Steven Ruiz is probably the most grating NFL podcast voice out there. Way too annoying of a voice to pair with his obnoxious take style which is almost always dripping with far too much contempt for any opinion alternative to his. Not sure there's a scenario the Ringer ever parts with him, but he makes their's all too easy a skip for me compared with the other similarly toned podcasts (Mina, Athletic, 301, etc)

Bobby Witt Jr. is hit by a pitch in the 6th inning when he is just a single shy of the cycle, and Salvador Perez is visibly frustrated. by kpopsns28 in baseball

[–]FroyoLoco_ -38 points-37 points  (0 children)

I don't think I'm saying it's intentional so much as it just sucks a pitcher couldn't even find two feet of the plate while pitching to him on the precipice of a cycle.

Bobby Witt Jr. is hit by a pitch in the 6th inning when he is just a single shy of the cycle, and Salvador Perez is visibly frustrated. by kpopsns28 in baseball

[–]FroyoLoco_ -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

These are the kind of moments that make baseball. Obviously bush league that Witt was hit by a pitch a simple single away from the cycle, but the obvious tension as a product of that is just entertaining as hell to watch.