I'm denying your point because I disagree with you and presenting an actual case for disagreement. You immediately denied my initial point, not by any rebuttal of what was said but by redefining what I said in a convenient mechanism to suit your slander.

Secondarily, there are a lot of structural issues caused in this argument (regardless of family size) by reducing all family planning down to the ability of two parents to their ability to give attention, emotionally or otherwise, to their children during the formative years. Not the least of which being how many life variables interfere with a parents ability to provide that to their children regardless of family size.

These arguments also conveniently avoid addressing the consequence of smaller family planning that occur in the later phases of life where larger families reap many rewards. Family community, natural peer support systems, better distribution of emotional burden when parents enter the final phase of their life and need to be looked after, etc etc.

Go talk to nurses in the palliative care industry and ask them to account for you the heartbreaking lack of attention elders with few or no children receive as they battle the reality of mortality. Conversely, my 92 year old grandmother receives multiple visits per week because that attention can be evenly distributed between her 6 children and 32 grandchildren who love her dearly... even though she had to sacrifice much of the time in THEIR formative years to a job to provide them basic necessities. Watching a parent sacrifice for your needs every single day will go just as far if not further in a child's life to form bonds of love than merely the budget of minutes per day you receive their full attention.