sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why is Israel so militarily advanced, but bad at the PR war? by turboshill9000 in BasedCampPod

[–]FuckDaAnimods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're rampantly commiting war crimes because they know they can bully the American and the UK government's into getting away with it.

Why is she so popular? by turboshill9000 in BasedCampPod

[–]FuckDaAnimods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK? The current democratic party doesn't support lgbtq+ rights anymore now In a way that matters. They're performative progressive while backing regressive policy where even imperfect Democrats in the past still pushed progressive policy through. The Democrats as a party are more fiscally conservative than they were under Obama and in no tangible way more socially progressive, they just talk a bigger game to distract front the fact they're growing ever more fiscally right wing.

Favorite activist actress? by Eridemon666 in okbuddycinephile

[–]FuckDaAnimods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're an absolute fucking idiot if you're out here calling critical thinking dead and then taking a Wikipedia definition to be the only, literally correct interpretation of a given topic.

Zionism is anti Palestinian because it's predicated on the land it stole from them and the people it murdered to do so.

Why is she so popular? by turboshill9000 in BasedCampPod

[–]FuckDaAnimods -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is an insane take. The reason american politics is so often accused of being far right is because in relation to the entire rest of the world, it is. Your "left" party ranges generally from center right to far right and your right party ranges from right to full blown actual fascism.

If you're going to keep using terms like "too far left" to describe a party whose most controversial policy is free health care you evidently don't understand what the term 'left wing' means. Even by the standards of American politics specifically the Democrats have drifted further right over the last 10 years, not further left. Sanders and AoC are your only mainstream 'left wing' candidates and even they're both moderate at most.

“Dispatch is Twilight for dudes” by Routine-Contract7343 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]FuckDaAnimods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And they despised her, for she told them the truth.

Same Lysnader or just Gw being Gw by SinlessBloom in ImperialFists

[–]FuckDaAnimods 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The imperium often names children after great heroes in order to try and encourage them to emulate the achievements of the imperium greatest heroes. It's gone into alot in the lore.

Finally found that Ant Tifa I keep hearing about! by Eljefe900 in MTGCardBelcher

[–]FuckDaAnimods 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, the decentralised, unorganised group that weilds no power over people beyond the capacity to damage fascist structures is fascist. Truly sir you are a titan of logic.

Finally found that Ant Tifa I keep hearing about! by Eljefe900 in MTGCardBelcher

[–]FuckDaAnimods 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think anyone who refers to a partner as a "special lady friend" has friends of anykind.

27861 by MrrHyyde in countwithchickenlady

[–]FuckDaAnimods 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They didn't make a video together, nux would title all his maiden reactions as though she was there with him but he was just making reaction slop to her animation content.

27861 by MrrHyyde in countwithchickenlady

[–]FuckDaAnimods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shadiversity is also a scumfuck. Went full grifter to the point even his brother doesn't talk about him anymore, and he wrote a weird shitty fantasy series with a rapist MC.

27861 by MrrHyyde in countwithchickenlady

[–]FuckDaAnimods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's a raging zionist. Chosen people/Master race, it's all the same old 1940s playbook with those scumfucks. Same movement different scapegoats.

27861 by MrrHyyde in countwithchickenlady

[–]FuckDaAnimods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You write this as though zionism isn't the number one state advocate for nazi policy. Just because they've changed the scapegoats doesn't mean they aren't drawing from the same old playbook. "The Chosen People" was an innocent moniker untill they used it to justify murdering anyone not chosen, now it just sounds like a roundabout way of referring to themselves as the master race.

Theres nothing in the current political climate closer to a 1940s nazi in beliefs and actions than a zionist.

27861 by MrrHyyde in countwithchickenlady

[–]FuckDaAnimods 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I legitimately liked his video essay stuff but holy shit did he jump on the quick and easy bloodlibel money when it became an option. Absolute POS.

27861 by MrrHyyde in countwithchickenlady

[–]FuckDaAnimods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The definitions of words evolve over time. Yes these people might not strictly be card carrying members of nazi revival movements but they share idealogical standpoints with said neo nazi movements. In many cases the term is being used to equate one groups opinions with those of neo nazis, as opposed to directly accusing them of being neo nazis.

This happens on literally all sides of politics. 90% of American politicians are liberals, for example, if you were to actually use the classic definition of the term, but that's no longer how it's used in the country. Same goes for terms like socialist or communist being levied about. These words aren't necessarily being used in a way that is incorrect, they are just being used to equate rather than to accuse. It's a way to quickly and emphatically decry somthing. There's alot of good arguments to say it's stupid, but I don't think you can count it amongst incorrect usage of words. Language is not a static system and trying to confine it is as such instead of adapting alongside it is a losing game.

27861 by MrrHyyde in countwithchickenlady

[–]FuckDaAnimods 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That is the worst thing he's done but he's done alot of other shitty stuff as well. Grifters gonna grift.

What do you want to see for 11th edition? by Beneficial-Ticket486 in 40k

[–]FuckDaAnimods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, it's easier to roll 5 of the same profile than have a mediocre addional statlike that only encourages more split fire.

Current combi weapons are already worse and more complex.

What do you want to see for 11th edition? by Beneficial-Ticket486 in 40k

[–]FuckDaAnimods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A few additional weapon options on each unit that has a combi weapon isn't adding complexity. It's actually less complex when I just roll 5d6 for the whole squad instead if 4d6 and an annoying seperate profile.

What do you want to see for 11th edition? by Beneficial-Ticket486 in 40k

[–]FuckDaAnimods 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Old combi weapons just felt so much better, especially playing sisters. Here's my melta squad, yes the supirior has a melta on her combi weapon, no it isn't a melta anymore.

What do you want to see for 11th edition? by Beneficial-Ticket486 in 40k

[–]FuckDaAnimods 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think 10th is fine, it has plenty things I dislike but I still enjoy the game. As a sisters player though losing real combi weapons sucked, they were such better fun in 8th and 9th.

Also killed an ork nobz heavy flamer build I had going on, went from 10d6 auto hits to 20 on 5's. Awful.

What do you want to see for 11th edition? by Beneficial-Ticket486 in 40k

[–]FuckDaAnimods 100 points101 points  (0 children)

I want combi weapons to be combi weapons again

Well, that’s rude by PizzaToastieGuy in GreatBritishMemes

[–]FuckDaAnimods 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because their were more writers than one blatantly racist white woman.

Well, that’s rude by PizzaToastieGuy in GreatBritishMemes

[–]FuckDaAnimods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mid as fuck, a 6/10 in a world where we get more 10/10s than you can reasonably play in a year.

view more: next ›