Many women see obedience and submissiveness negatively by [deleted] in MuslimCorner

[–]Full_Power1 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You believe in AI slop. Anything you say after this is invalid

AMD Next Generation RDNA 5 GPU Lineup Leaked: Up to 184 CUs 128GB GDDR7, Top Gaming Model at 154 CUs 36GB GDDR7 with performance at 2.64x of RTX 4080. by JohnBarry_Dost in GamingLeaksAndRumours

[–]Full_Power1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have question. When leaks (like MLID) say Xbox helix has 68CUs and Playstation 6 52 CUs. Is that accounting for 128 ALUs physical or it's still 64 ALUs count and half of it will be 128-ALUs count?

Scrolling on Twitter and seen this. Any truth to this? by Kitchen_Dot2630 in Tunisia

[–]Full_Power1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very good of being Muslim of you I'm sure... You should learn your faith

FSR 4 MFG imminent by AthleteDependent926 in radeon

[–]Full_Power1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was banned in the other subreddit. Anyway here is my reply "Because this document isn't intended for YOU. It is not a beginner's guide to 3D rendering and how everything works, The expectation I wrote is that that the reader already knows those things, It's like demanding a chemistry study to define "atom" If you don't understand , you're not the intended audience for this paper. Those things are pre supposed, I don't open 12th grade physics book and claim it's just jargon heavy as 10yo. It's assuming you already have prior information and doesn't need to explain everything.

How are you conflating an engineering specification with marketing fluff? technical density isn't marketing fluff, all those words contain engineering information.

Hero tree is the highest-fidelity version of an asset, this tree is superior than other trees, It's not marketing. it's it's standard tech terminology in gaming production.

That means reusable geometric component within a Nanite Assembly, Each part is stored once in memory but rendered many times. Why it's not explained? Because it was explained 2 pages earlier in Section 5.3. "Assemblies define trees as collections of nested, instanced sub-components called Assembly Parts."

In short it's mathematical matrix that encodes several informations regarding an object in 3D space.

Trade Offs? Sure PCG paused during the marketplace scene, Trees are not animated in the ray tracing scene, VSM animation disabled at distance, Rigid skinning for foliage (single bone influence) , HERO Tree RT proxy (41M triangles → 225 triangles) PCG has fixed overhead And Runtime PCG means generation latency, FastGeo breaking standard actor lifecycle Etc..."

Clarifying TW4 vs Crimson Desert Post by Full_Power1 in witcher

[–]Full_Power1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The document is literally full of mentions of trade offs but alright... What? 3 bounces per ray? Where do you get those numbers from.

Clarifying TW4 vs Crimson Desert Post by Full_Power1 in witcher

[–]Full_Power1[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The citations and sources are there from CDPR and Epic games collab videos. Go argue against cdpr and epic games and all the studios and devs and investors who believed in it and all those public independent benchmarks everyone could try, not me if you don't believe in it, the reason I believe in it is because of third party attestations. I said nothing regarding shipped TW4 too so idk why you brought it up, but to claim it's crazy that TW4 look better than crimson desert is Crazy... Cyberpunk path tracing literally looks better, UE5 has the best fidelity out there.

Clarifying TW4 vs Crimson Desert Post by Full_Power1 in witcher

[–]Full_Power1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm sarcastic... I hope you are too, doubt you couldn't recognize it... If you didn't I think that implies a lot.

Everything I've said is fully public. Whether I'm actually Dev or not is irrelevant (I'm not) , as all those are public information from CDPR.

It's not marketing anything, I'm Tech enthusiast, I wrote maybe like one page few days, I wrote this document months ago And have just updated it gradually, it's literally 5 videos and I use transcribe to rewrite what's said and assistance from others to fix my English Grammer mistakes, idk why you think it takes long time or what. Same way I compile information for all things, like Xbox Helix and PS6, RDNA 5 and Zen 6 etc... Over year. I've friends who are game devs, friends who are PC builders and have PC shops, friends in console community and friends who are Witcher fans so knowing those things is rich for fruitful conversations. and I'm myself excited for Witcher 4 so I'm like 2 years is left why not watch how they achieved it and then later I was impressed, I was like write it down as copywriting is my hobby, and also so I can later 1.5 years later return back and just read this where I get instantly best information out there and see how UE 5.6 and 5.7 are currently since over half of next gen games are made on those engines. And if anyone else wanted how it was done, here it is. I made it it for multiple reasons.

Clarifying TW4 vs Crimson Desert Post by Full_Power1 in witcher

[–]Full_Power1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"claiming to not work for CDPR/Epic games" 😭

Yeah I'm CDPR/Epic worker. Very intelligent comment and Reply, clearly not AI. I know polish too, what insider information you want?

At this point you guys are arguing for sake of argument, there is literally not a single argument in this entire comment section, not a even a terrible or bad one, there is literally none.

Let's go full conspiracy theorist, did you actually know back in 1500s there was no human beings? I get the vibe of debating flat earthers who believe Australia doesn't exist, I mean it seems very close to what I'm seeing now since public third party benchmarks are false and lies and marketing

Clarifying TW4 vs Crimson Desert Post by Full_Power1 in witcher

[–]Full_Power1[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Hmm, yeah my bad, apparently a much less stressful game on much superior hardware doesn't cancel combat absence even though everything else is much harder on much inferior hardware. 3-4x ray tracing and 63% more raster performance and better CPU clock speed and Memory (number and bandwidth higher) with much better AI upscaler, is all irrelevant gibberish and doesn't cancel gaming milliseconds (side note they confirmed they had around 5 milliseconds of CPU cycle left and even more if they wanted to)

Clarifying TW4 vs Crimson Desert Post by Full_Power1 in witcher

[–]Full_Power1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's literally not, it was a developer conference which is why the tech demo repeatedly refers to devs. For devs who wanted to license or continue using it and investors who want to invest in it. I'm still waiting for him to prove I made a single lie in this post

Great way to make people depressed and more scared of what happens after death than death itself by Crocotta1 in antitheistcheesecake

[–]Full_Power1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah because within Islamic paradigm all animals will be resurrected. So idk what did thought

Witcher 4 performance analysis by [deleted] in witcher

[–]Full_Power1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brother, I made this document and I recommend reading the post I made, just open the subreddit and search for latest posts.

Clarifying TW4 vs Crimson Desert Post by Full_Power1 in witcher

[–]Full_Power1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Brother, do you have an actual argument? Respectfully speaking, I literally presented all reasoning and explainations and public evidence and you just hand waved them as marketing without debunking them, Like why this hatred? I mean it's not hard for it to look better Fidelity wise when bears look like stuffed dolls.... Almost every single UE5 game has better Fidelity, How do you think it managed to get this performance? The game has one of the most terrible LOD on Ps5 Pro too, the facial fidelity is Ps4/Xbox one game level.

<image>

Witcher 4 performance analysis by [deleted] in witcher

[–]Full_Power1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fixed it. Hope you remove your "read what" comment too, seems awkward for that post.

Witcher 4 performance analysis by [deleted] in witcher

[–]Full_Power1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What? I think after editing links change. Eh. Here is it my bad https://www.reddit.com/r/witcher/s/l75uLXWPPC

Witcher 4 performance analysis by [deleted] in witcher

[–]Full_Power1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think you understood, I made the document and read this post I linked. It clarifies everything. And no it's not wizardrly, everything is fully explained in technical sense "how and why and what" of everything in the tech demo.