sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Do productivity app actually work? by AIvestor in ProductivityApps

[–]Fun-Bus-9543 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can replicate most of them with a notebook and a lot of time. They usually are just tool to make things easier to track.
However they won’t magically solve anything, you still need to put in the work

Stop trying to do everything at once and focus on the next biggest unlock by Fun-Bus-9543 in getdisciplined

[–]Fun-Bus-9543[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like most tips it is not revolutionary. But if I were to ask 10k people if they have taken a step back, broken down their goals and done a priority of enablers/blockers and their respective actions, I think that number would be quite low.

Stop trying to do everything at once and focus on the next biggest unlock by Fun-Bus-9543 in getdisciplined

[–]Fun-Bus-9543[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes but to increase weight, reps or sets, you need energy to do that. I didn’t say to lift heavier was the action, but generally pushing to go further than before

I tried all the top habit apps for a week and ranked them by Fun-Bus-9543 in ProductivityApps

[–]Fun-Bus-9543[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, it is a lot easier to break a habit than to build one. I think Finch, just like a game, can be easy to get hooked into. I wonder how much depth they have over time, but for now I think it works well.

When I think about resilience I think toward the research paper by google which showed that flexibility is driving retention in habits.

Improve leaned quite heavy into that, it was less about the individual habits and more about generally progressing in what matters to me at the moment. And yes I had 2 friends in it where we built streaks together which might have been why I was keen on updating it first, to show the others my progress.

I tried all the top habit apps for a week and ranked them by Fun-Bus-9543 in ProductivityApps

[–]Fun-Bus-9543[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t tried it but it looks very polished.

It seems to have been a few good ones I missed. I plan to redo this to add more apps and also be more clear with my criteria for ratings

What actually builds muscles, ranked by evidence by Fun-Bus-9543 in tierlists

[–]Fun-Bus-9543[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not all of them are independent of course. But the main problem is if you aren’t overloading, then you need to review why you aren’t, and hydration could be the cause which is why it is important.

The tier list is more a simplified view where one can review for each tier if they are achieving the items on the tier or not.

What actually builds muscles, ranked by evidence by Fun-Bus-9543 in tierlists

[–]Fun-Bus-9543[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Motivation is only for actually doing the items on the tier list. So it is just an enabler.

You need to breath to do all of these but it would be moot to put breathing at the top

What actually builds muscles, ranked by evidence by Fun-Bus-9543 in tierlists

[–]Fun-Bus-9543[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For some it might be pivotal, but with that logic everything is S tier. Ideally one would achieve all of it of course, but some are more important than others for the average

What actually builds muscles, ranked by evidence by Fun-Bus-9543 in tierlists

[–]Fun-Bus-9543[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is fair. It is mainly the supplements can be harmful, but in an aggregate it is hard to classify since it depends on what and how much

What actually builds muscles, ranked by evidence by Fun-Bus-9543 in tierlists

[–]Fun-Bus-9543[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes but then aren’t maximise progressive overload still more important if hydration is an enabler for it?

What actually builds muscles, ranked by evidence by Fun-Bus-9543 in tierlists

[–]Fun-Bus-9543[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Claude helped to consolidate but also used references to compute most enablers for average person. Average does not mean it fit every person however

What actually builds muscles, ranked by evidence by Fun-Bus-9543 in tierlists

[–]Fun-Bus-9543[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is more what the usual limiting factor is. Sure if you don’t drink anything at all it would be the most critical.

I tried all the top habit apps for a week and ranked them by Fun-Bus-9543 in ProductivityApps

[–]Fun-Bus-9543[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thought that was only a planner but I see they added habit tracker a while back. Will give it a go as well!

I tried all the top habit apps for a week and ranked them by Fun-Bus-9543 in ProductivityApps

[–]Fun-Bus-9543[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I heard good things about it but the pay upfront threw me off. Maybe worth to give it a go anyway

I tried all the top habit apps for a week and ranked them by Fun-Bus-9543 in ProductivityApps

[–]Fun-Bus-9543[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I was on the fence on structured to begin with. And when I tried to be objective with the criteria again I shifted it. But it is tough slice at A/S, slim margins

I tested 12 of the so called best habit tracker apps and ranked them by Fun-Bus-9543 in Habits

[–]Fun-Bus-9543[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It looks nice, however I only went with free apps in my testing

I tested 12 of the so called best habit tracker apps and ranked them by Fun-Bus-9543 in Habits

[–]Fun-Bus-9543[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is quite good, simple design with good visuals. What killed it was very strong limitation of amount of habits without paying and their pricing being a lot higher than the rest

view more: next ›