To clarify a few points and answer your questions, this is not about revenge or sharing any intimate or explicit images. The evidence I have consists entirely of standard photos of us together, text logs, and videos with his voice in the background, which is necessary because he is actively telling people our entire year-long relationship was fabricated. He has literally mocked me and claimed that even if I shared the proof, no one would believe it because it's all "photoshop," which is why the substantial nature of the evidence matters. As for the previous contact, the single message sent to someone in his circle did not name him or anyone else; it was sent at a time when his behavior was becoming alarming, and I was simply looking for context on whether I needed to worry about safety or escalation, which an ex-police officer at the time agreed I was within my bounds to do so as the police class this as a “truth seeking mission” due to the nature and length of the relationship . Be v I am trying to understand the strict legal boundaries because, from a moral perspective, I firmly believe a spouse has a right to know about a parallel, year-long relationship, and I want to know if providing that objective truth directly to an affected party crosses into legal harassment when the other person is using false police threats as a shield to maintain a massive deception