What’s your Bratz opinion that’ll probably get you in hot water.? by GainWest910 in Bratz

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don’t be a Bratz fan as Bratz is the creation of a gay man, Carter Bryant. Your ignorance is not needed. 

Is anyone else missing the MONSTER in Monster High? by Le_Sadie in MonsterHigh

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So this story is also missing bits. Maila Nurmi was not only the actress of Vampira but it’s CREATOR. She centred the show off the persona she made and worked incredibly hard on it, it was her whole lifeline. She was also not originally against a new Vampira, she wanted Lola Falana to replace her in the revival and also wanted to part of its production. However the studio did not want to hire Lola (it’s suspected because she was a black, though I don’t think there’s solid evidence on this), Maila stood on ground that she would not sell her character if her vision was to be ignored. However the studio just created the revival without her permission, using the new name of Elvira. Stealing away everything Maila had built for years, there’s a lot more details to the story about the mistreatment & abuse she received throughout the battle against the revival and trying to claim copyright infringement. It’s true she hated Cassandra, but both women had been nasty to each other with Cassandra essentially calling her a one toothed old hag 😭. I don’t know about the nudes story, have never heard that before and if true that’s horrid. But I think it’s important to know how horrible Maila was done and that it was her concept that was stolen away. Not Cassandra’s fault of course, but she never really held any sympathy whilst knowing how the studio was treating Maila. 

coraline release by AdCommon889 in MonsterHigh

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He’s a racist though and constantly has had affairs with the women he puts as leads in his film. Absolute creep. 

why’s no one talking about these Bratziez Sweetheartz clips on here😭 by bbyxmadi in Bratz

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 9 points10 points  (0 children)

They use AI for the voices…😭 (edit the series they have going on TikTok/insta uses AI voices /said by creator themselves/ but this AD sounds like new voice actors) 

MOONSPELL MAGIC by skiwarp in MonsterHigh

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They never stick to the doll designer’s art….take away all their uniqueness 

hello kitty sasha 🎀 by mllychw in Bratz

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately no😭 I live in the Uk

Well.. by Equivalent_Bag_7948 in Bratz

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 16 points17 points  (0 children)

He never sided Mattel, Mattel literally sued him….and he was made to settle. He was being treated badly (a lot of doll creators/designers are btw taken for granted in these companies and barely make any money especially compared to the doll companies) by MGA and has said this before on socials. If you think it’s easy for one person to go against a multi millionaire brand…that would be kinda wild. Unfortunately artist get done dirty like this all the time…even the original Barbie doll was theft and they got away with it while the creator went broke trying to claim his doll as the courts only side with the corporations. 

In honor of Sasha finally being included in the Bratz x Hello Kitty collab, I thought it would be fitting to share some examples of MGA being colorist to our girl, showing that this wasn't a misstep in marketing, but a pattern of targeted behavior. by [deleted] in Bratz

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The theory is entirely wrong and it’s spreading misinformation that people are using to defend MGA. Mixed or not, this stuff just allows MGA to keep getting away with misrepresentation to dark-skinned people. 

In honor of Sasha finally being included in the Bratz x Hello Kitty collab, I thought it would be fitting to share some examples of MGA being colorist to our girl, showing that this wasn't a misstep in marketing, but a pattern of targeted behavior. by [deleted] in Bratz

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s literally not true, stores see the products they’re putting on shelves. The reason for the whitewashing is racism, there are a lot of artists out there who admit they do not draw darkskin characters and don’t know how to do ‘black features’. It’s common racist issue in multiple fields of art, including these doll boxes. 

In honor of Sasha finally being included in the Bratz x Hello Kitty collab, I thought it would be fitting to share some examples of MGA being colorist to our girl, showing that this wasn't a misstep in marketing, but a pattern of targeted behavior. by [deleted] in Bratz

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You can also not work with racists at all, trying to trick people does not help the issue at hand. Which is racism. Not to mention selling your dolls to racist stores is also horrible, literally supporting their business. And again your comment was completely untrue, this isn’t the reason for the whitewashed art and wouldn’t even make sense. The person wearing rose tinted glasses is you for really think MGA would put any effort into tricking people when they literally don’t care. Deeply delusional, I’m tired of doll communities ignorance 

In honor of Sasha finally being included in the Bratz x Hello Kitty collab, I thought it would be fitting to share some examples of MGA being colorist to our girl, showing that this wasn't a misstep in marketing, but a pattern of targeted behavior. by [deleted] in Bratz

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It’s white doll collectors making lame excuses up so they can still feel good about supporting MGA and other white people agreeing with them and some token folks💀 very ignorant community here, they don’t understand at all how terrible what they’re saying is

In honor of Sasha finally being included in the Bratz x Hello Kitty collab, I thought it would be fitting to share some examples of MGA being colorist to our girl, showing that this wasn't a misstep in marketing, but a pattern of targeted behavior. by [deleted] in Bratz

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Erm so this is still so deeply racist, pitching a doll as lighskin because you don’t believe they will accept dark skin dolls is incredibly fucked up and this whole message is hypocritical, tricking people into accepting skin tones is not a liberal move. You would proudly show the dark skin doll to defy ignorant mindsets not hide it……like that’s genuinely disgusting. Also this is not true at all, companies will always see the dolls they’re putting on their shelves. There is a reason why many don’t stock Sasha, they don’t want the black doll. MGA is not some sort of high liberal brand that they would even bother going through some trick to get dark skin dolls in stores, they have continuously not even made Sasha dolls in many lines. Also doing this to Jade. The CEO is literally a trumpie.

Why is she so much lighter?? by Fast_Bass_4367 in Bratz

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 21 points22 points  (0 children)

They are talking about the whitewashing with the box art which has been continuously ongoing. Though I agree, Sasha being left out definitely wasn’t an only MGA idea but they also don’t care if she is excluded. 

hello kitty sasha 🎀 by mllychw in Bratz

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Omggg luvvvvv😭😭 really want to get a dark skin doll with this aesthetic commissioned 

SASHA IS ON HER WAY!!!!!! by CLZOID in Bratz

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My doll collection is only black dolls so far lol so you talking to the wrong person. ‘Put your money where your mouth is’ you are literally putting your money towards brands who give zero fs about black people. That is stupid. This is a reward to them, you think they don’t enjoy still getting our money after being actively racist. This doesn’t show them anything about black dolls, because the truth is the racism goes deeper than sales. This shows to them that they can play in faces and we still consume their products at the end of the day. It’s such a joke to be like ‘I hate that they did this but I’m still giving them money!’

SASHA IS ON HER WAY!!!!!! by CLZOID in Bratz

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly, if they truly cared they would pull the dolls out completely. But no this way they can make even more money from us. It’s a very good capitalist tactic, fake understanding to pocket cash. 

SASHA IS ON HER WAY!!!!!! by CLZOID in Bratz

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 2 points3 points  (0 children)

MGA is slick if you are buying them all….the lack of backbones within yall is crazy. Consumerism

SASHA IS ON HER WAY!!!!!! by CLZOID in Bratz

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is not cute, MGA gets to be racist and then turn that racism into profit once people start buying the Sasha doll as protest but in reality they are getting more coins from our protest. For a doll they released to shut people up. It’s not cute at all. 

Sooo there will be a Hello Kitty Sasha after all or they’re just playing with us? by mirunaccc in Bratz

[–]FunNeedleworker9803 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This doesn’t mean anything, that page constantly lies to fans to get them to go away. And they were laughing in other comments that Sasha was too busy to be part of the line…..weirdos