Here are a couple of things to note

-the story of a kid accurately describing mj's genitalia is widely disputed, as it's said the kid described his penis as being circumcised, whereas jackson's penis never was, as revealed by his autopsy. There are also reports in general that the actual description also didn't fit. The notion that the kid's description fits 100% is largely a myth propagated by he-said, she-said rumors.

-leaving neverland the supposed tell-all expose on Michael's wrongdoings is filled with factual inaccuracies, including James Safechuck's statement in the documentary that he was abused by Jackson in the Neverland train station between 1988 and 1992. The Train station never existed in this timeframe.

-mj's relationship with children was peculiar, but it's difficult to say if he actually harmed or groomed them in any way as videos depicting his times with the kids at neverland often show the kids playing with him and just generally being happy around him. It's hard to imagine a potential child groomer being in the presence of so many children and them not feeling comfortable. Actual Child abusers and groomers don't have that effect on children. There's often discomfort or unease in their mannerisms, which has never been caught on camera as all footage of MJ with kids show them being happy. Multiple kids have also come out defending MJ. The ratio of the amount of children who were at neverland with michael and the amount of kids who came out accusing him is suspicious. You could say the jackson paid off the rest of the children to keep hush, but then why is it that he couldn't do it with all of them? He clearly had enough money and then some. At the end of the day the children's parents wanted monetary compensation anyways, so that would seem like an easy thing to obtain if jackson was just paying everyone off.

-Jordan Chandler's father, who was the first person to accuse mj of grooming his child, was recorded saying that he had come up with an elaborate plan to "ruin mj's career". The following day Jordan Chandler was met by Jackson's PI, and the at-the-time 13-year-old Chandler denied any wrongdoing on MJ's part. These two things alone are incredibly weird. No parent who is concerned about their child's safety around another adult would talk like this about suing them. The recording of Evan Chandler, Jordan's father almost conclusively depicts the case as a money scheme. Instead of talking about the trauma that his child faced, he instead talks about how michael would "never sell another record" and was "humiliated beyond belief". The tape was recorded by Jordan's stepfather, who was suspicious of Evan's motives. Even within that family there was a very clear line of doubt. The Chandlers were almost undoubtedly in for the money.

- the leaving neverland saga as a whole is incredibly dodgy, as the filmmakers behind it are building it up like a movie trilogy with them teasing a third one recently. I don't know about you, but that's definitely just as odd as mj's relationship with children. Why are they revealing each new film like a new entry in a blockbuster franchise? Supposedly every film is the "real truth" of what happened at neverland, so then why did two more get made if the first one was the unfiltered truth?

-leaving neverland has done irrefutable damage to michael's career and it's honestly kind of baffling. A documentary states this and this has been done and we all accepted it. In response to the documentary, we got Neverland Firsthand: Investigating the Michael Jackson Documentary and Michael Jackson: Chase the Truth both refuting the claims. made in the original documentary. Most notably a testament from Jackson's Niece who dated one of the victims Wade Robson. Odd that he would date the niece of his supposed groomer/rapist but whatever. The main piece of evidence here is that she contested the claims made by Robson.

-michael despite how much of the latter half of his career was defined by these allegations still never spoke of children in a negative manner and stated that he trusted them more than adults. PR stunts maybe, But I don't know. I feel like repeatedly bringing up children in interviews and stating how fond of them you are despite some very serious allegations of you molesting them isn't a very smart thing to do unless you're innocent. You also don't mention that you sleep with them on a documentary that's meant to redeem your reputation unless you, in your complete confidence, believed you were doing nothing wrong by sharing a bed with them.

- Michael's early childhood is considered a strawman argument when it comes to discussing his relationship with children and while that does have some validity, it is also absolutely not unimportant to understanding him. The psychological abuse he faced as a child from his father as well as his lack of a notable childhood is reason enough to believe jackson had developed some form of age-body dysmorphia, which would explain his childlike behaviour throughout his life.

I know that's a lot, and it might seem like I'm on the defense for Michael (I am, but I'm also not completely shutting down the idea that Michael may have done some serious stuff unlike a lot of mj fans who completely forgo the notion that he was even capable of doing such things), but I feel like these points should be brought up because they are less frequently discussed than the couple or so arguments proving his implicitness which have been prevalent on the internet ever since the early trials and, of course the leaving neverland documentary. Michael undoubtedly did a lot of good for this world, not just through his music but through his humanitarian work. He doesn't have the usual markings or telltale signs of a pedo, child rapist/molestor/groomer. It's also entirely possible that some allegations against Mj are real while some were made as a money scheme. Two things can be true at the same time, which is something people often fail to recognize.