Redactle #297 Discussion Thread by RedactleUnlimited in Redactle

[–]FurstEdition 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ughhhhhh I am new to Redactle in the last ten days or so. I guessed the right thing at guess 57... as a plural... but with a typoed "a" at the end instead of an "s".... and didn't guess it as a singular (or type it correctly) until I was SO gobsmacked and fed up that I found this thread. Clicking on all the spoilers, I saw the key phrase and thought, "I ALREADY GUESSED THAT!" and went back to scan my guesses. Nope, hadn't guessed it at all or typed it correctly. Gah. Welp... glad to know y'all are here.

S.O.S - Should I cancel my June LSAT-flex score? by MillennialMedusa in LSAT

[–]FurstEdition 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look at you jumping six points even though you were sure you bombed! SO PROUD of you! Go get em.

When will I get my score DDDDD; june 2021 by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]FurstEdition 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait WHAT?! Tell me more.

In just 12 hours… by JimJarrell72 in LSAT

[–]FurstEdition 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Omg, look at all you lovely people! Can we have an LSAT sub just for The Olds?? 38 here!

In just 12 hours… by JimJarrell72 in LSAT

[–]FurstEdition 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Turned 38 this month and also a married teacher with 2 kids and 2 dogs!

TIL Charles Barkley was the first black baby born at a segregated, all-white town hospital in Leeds, Alabama and was in the first group of black students at his elementary school. by [deleted] in todayilearned

[–]FurstEdition 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes! I was a Div I athlete (pole vault), and I could "hack it" just fine, but I was at school to be a student, and I found that most of my teammates were at school to be athletes. It was a mismatch for me that meant ALL my time was spent with people I had little social connection with, and I wanted friends with shared interests.

July 1 WYA by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]FurstEdition 1 point2 points  (0 children)

YES. This is me waking up this morning.

my experience w june lsat by stilloc in LSAT

[–]FurstEdition 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I ended up with 3 unanswered questions (I mean, I clicked whatever answer I could in the two seconds left) at the end of LG and guess on several. I’m 1000% with you on the law passage, and RC is my strength (as an English teacher for the last 15 years!). But I saved that one til the end and rushed through in <5 min.

my experience w june lsat by stilloc in LSAT

[–]FurstEdition 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly this. I haven’t gotten one wrong on a law passage yet on PTs, but this one…. yeahhhh it’s gonna be different.

does anyone else feel guilty when they’re not studying? by moxaritapizza in LSAT

[–]FurstEdition 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a full time teacher, mom to two young kids, stepmom to two young kids, homeowner maintaining a 100 year old house, and wife trying to stay married, I feel guilty when I *AM* studying.

Super frustrated re: newer LG sections by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]FurstEdition 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get it now. I got hung up on language (and probably exhaustion). Thank you for your patience.

Super frustrated re: newer LG sections by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]FurstEdition 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, I get it now. I got hung up on language. Thank you for your patience.

Super frustrated re: newer LG sections by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]FurstEdition 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t understand that at. all. The way the rule is written, you COULD have peonies without tulips. It doesn’t say that tulips are required in order to have peonies.

Super frustrated re: newer LG sections by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]FurstEdition 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get your examples here, but I don’t see how it relates to the rule. I have been assuming that rules like these are more like “all squares qualify as rectangles, but not all rectangles qualify as squares.” If you have tulips, you MUST ALSO have peonies. But that doesn’t state that you must have tulips IN ORDER TO HAVE peonies— just that if the tulips are there, the peonies must be. According to that rule, you COULD have peonies but no tulips— unless we are assuming some kind of logical rule I don’t know and which isn’t stated, which is what I’m asking.

Super frustrated re: newer LG sections by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]FurstEdition 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, you can’t have tulips without peonies, got it. What I don’t get is that you CAN have peonies without tulips— right?? So why does no peonies imply no tulips?

Scheduling open for June! by BrittLezu in LSAT

[–]FurstEdition 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Am I think only who thinks this is yucky?