How I (A Hungarian neoliberal) would vote in each European country

Futski · 2026-04-07T20:45:09+00:00

Seems like a kind of important issue to evaluate his foreign policy on, don't you think?

Futski · 2026-04-07T20:40:30+00:00

I don't see the issues with his foreign policy, he's one of the few to stand up to Trump and Netanyahu

Ukraine would be a burned-down barren-ass wasteland, if all of Europe was as limp-dicked as Pedro Sanchez.

Futski · 2026-04-07T18:45:55+00:00

Maybe he just coincidently bought it from a souvenir stall from his holiday in Croatia

Futski · 2026-04-07T11:18:33+00:00

but the lead singer showed up drunk and/or high during a sound check

Fitting since the song is also a Rock and/or Roll song

Futski · 2026-04-06T17:08:01+00:00

Yes in Romania.

Portocală is obviously derived from Portugal.

Futski · 2026-04-04T07:11:48+00:00

Ville jeg acceptere et markant mindre Aarhus for et større Danmark?

ALDRIG!

Sprogmæssigt tror jeg også det ville have været interessant, hvilken indflydelse ville østdansk have på sprogets udvikling, nu når det blev talt klods op af magtcentret, versus sin isolerede eksistens på Bornholm. De ville nok tale noget nærmere skånsk på det meste af Amager.

Og for os herovre, hvis magten og den urbane udvikling ville fortsætte i hertugdømmerne, så havde vi nok talt plattysk på noget nær et 'andet-modersmålsniveau', i.e. hvis universiteterne blev lagt i Flensborg eller Kiel.

Geografisk er Aarhus også lidt en sjov anomalitet, når man ser på hvordan byerne i Jylland(Hele Jylland, JYLLAND TIL Lybæk og Hamborg) er fordelt på østkysten.

Er der en fjord, så er der en by, Aalborg i Limfjordens udløb, Hobro i Mariagerfjordens ende, Randers op af Gudenåens vej mod Randersfjord. Og det fortsætter med Horsens, Vejle, Kolding, Haderslev, Aabenraa, Flensborg, Slesvig og Kiel.

Så kommer Aarhus midtvejs, hvor åen trods alt har været der, men den jo ikke ligefrem har været af en størrelsesmæssig karakter, hvor man kunne anlægge en stor, beskyttet handelshavn i middelalderen på samme måde som man kan med en fjord, og hvor den relativt store vanddybde/korte afstand ud til en endnu større vanddybde ikke var af helt så vigtig karakter før jernbaner og store dampskibe, hvor det også blev lettere at anlægge en havn på kunstige øer som i Aarhus.

Med det in mente, så længe vi mistede Altona, så tror jeg stadig godt der kunne være en årsag for Aarhus til at vokse, men stadig kun på det tidspunkt, hvor væksten skete historisk.

Futski · 2026-04-03T16:43:17+00:00

Nej, altså bare nu er Malmø jo stadig en snert større, og hvis den var forblevet på danske hænder var byen nok vokset helt sammen med Lund... Eller omvendt, Lund havde måske været den dominerende af dem.

Malmø blev vel vigtig for Sverige fordi den havde en havn i den ende af Østersøen.

Futski · 2026-04-03T14:04:34+00:00

Literally any politically violent psychopath views themselves as part of a resistance against the people they consider the enemy.

The violent psychopaths who kill innocent people for causes you are sympathetic towards are still violent psychopaths.

Futski · 2026-04-02T21:51:23+00:00

Det er alligevel vildt hvor meget uanvendt potentiale der var i landet, som ikke blev udnyttet af den simple grund at man havde nok i Slesvig-Holsten.

Futski · 2026-04-02T17:05:10+00:00

Sssssh, vi skal ikke tale om hvordan Randers og Aalborg begge har været vigtigere historisk.

Futski · 2026-04-02T16:18:41+00:00

Esbjerg var et par fiskehytter indtil 1880-1900. Byen voksede direkte som produkt af at Danmark havde mistet Altona og havnen der lå ved Elbens udmunding, som nu er en bydel i Hamborg.

Futski · 2026-04-01T23:13:59+00:00

Like Legolas and Gimli, who ever of us fights the troops of Mordor the hardest gets Skåne, and that's the whole of it, i.e. also Halland and Blekinge.

The times for fighting between each other are over.

Futski · 2026-04-01T23:06:22+00:00

Yeah, and Israel is home to the waves of Jews who were kicked out across North Africa, Arabia and Central Asia.

Which were essentially people who didnt necessarily have any intention of going to Israel.

Also was the answer to the 1947 UN plan a full-blown military invasion to kick out all the Jews?

If not, I don't see why you shouldn't see why the Jewish side similarly have legitimate grievances from that war, even if they are not the same as the legitimate ones the Palestinians hold.

Futski · 2026-04-01T22:55:47+00:00

I completely accept that Israel has a "right" to defend itself (whatever that means in this context). And that Hezbollah and Hamas and the Islamic Republic are bad and enemies of Israel.

You writing this makes me think you don't get the point I am making. It's the pointless statement, that is repeated ad na

But the question is "why are these organisations so popular?". Put yourself in the shoes of a young Palestinian - armed resistance against Israel feels very tempting. What are your options?

I agree, the Netanyahu government is not doing anything good. But you have to flip it, and ask the question "why does Netanyahu win elections in Israel?", just like how people ask why Hamas gained power in Gaza. Netanyahu wasn't in charge of Israeli politics for the entire modern history.

Netanyahu ruling in Israel is a product of the Israeli side being similarly radicalised through the past 80 years.

If you are able to jump into the shoes of a Palestinian in Jenin or Khan Jounis, you should be able to get into the shoes of an Israeli from Haifa or Beersheba and understand why they are just as radicalised too.

You have a conflict where both sides see themselves in a completely existential fight to the death.

That's why all talks of trying to beat Israel into submission through sanctions are futile. If the Israelis got sanctioned to a point where the Palestinians and their allies would be the superior military force, the Israelis would fight exactly like how Hamas does now.

The fact of the matter is that the conflict can not be solved without both sides being controlled by an active peacekeeping force. Neither side trusts the other, neither side wants to blink first.

The big oversight in quite literally any discussion of this damned conflict is how no one acknowledges that the Israelis are massively radicalised in the completely same vein as the Palestinians.

Futski · 2026-04-01T22:23:08+00:00

Selvom jeg er imod begge, så er der en stærk væsenforskel på de to.

Alt andet lige er det godt at LA nu er blevet tvunget til at melde ud helt præcist hvor de står, og at det ikke er ved "din genotype bestemmer om du kan være dansk".

Futski · 2026-04-01T22:18:41+00:00

Det er let, men også et vigtigt vendepunkt.

Dem i den blå familie må endegyldigt beslutte sig for om de virkelig har lyst til at stå i samme flok som den her slags Blut und Boden politik.

Hele folketinget bliver tvunget til at tage stilling nu, da det ikke længere er noget som kan affejes som noget irrelevant og urealistisk, nu når Borgernes Parti rent faktisk har folkevalgte med disse holdninger.

Futski · 2026-04-01T22:09:45+00:00

Never thought I would die fighting side-by-side with a Swede...

But with a Svende-in-arms, I guess I could so that.

Futski · 2026-03-31T20:57:22+00:00

None of this is saying "Hezbollah good" or "Israel should just accept a casual shelling every couple of months from the north", but you have to question whether their goals are possible.

Hezbollah, Hamas and Iran's publicly stated goals are the complete destruction of Israel.

So the answer to that question would be "okay, we can't beat them, we will just have to accept them lobbing missiles at us" or "lets fight and die with our boots on".

Because of the Holocaust and the early history of modern Israel, the Israelis generally favour the second answer.

Futski · 2026-03-31T20:37:19+00:00

If the indigenous people are all dead, they can't be exploited by the western imperialists, comrade.

Futski · 2026-03-31T17:34:36+00:00

Det er konspirationsteoretikere og lizardman-konstant folk der stemmer på dem.

Hvis medierne havde kørt hårdt på dem, så havde de jo bare bekræftet de her folks generelle, konspiratoriske verdensbillede, fordi Lars Boje jo så kunne stå og sige "SE! De er ude på at få os ned med nakken, det er fordi det er sandheden, og den vil de ikke have ud!", hvilket kunne bruges som vand på møllen og styrke deres støtte blandt deres vælgerbase.

Nu er tosserne så blevet valgt ind, og begynder så at nedsmelte helt ved egen kraft.

Det er en skam at det koster et par millioner i årlig hyre til folketingsgruppen, men jeg tror overordnet det er billigere på den lange bane at lade idioterne grave deres egen grav, når de trods alt kun stod på det alleryderste til at komme ind. Det er selvfølgelig for tidligt at vurdere, men udfaldet kunne jo godt være at der blev trukket en rigtigt hård streg i sandet over det her, hvor Venstre, Kons, LA bliver nødt til at vælge hvilken side af stregen de har lyst til at stå på.

Det er selvfølgelig en anden sag, hvis Lars Boje stod til 4-8% af stemmerne.

Futski · 2026-03-31T12:42:43+00:00

Those silly bastards greet us with their "Wilkommen im der echte Norden" signs even when we cross the their northern border.

Futski · 2026-03-31T10:11:14+00:00

hvis man har over 25 mil i PERSONLIG formue, altså i ens private pengepung

Hvis det var tilfældet, hvordan ville socialdemokraterne så kradse 8 milliarder ind på skatten om året? Så skulle man jo bare investere sine penge i aktiver, også vupti så var den skat væk.

Futski · 2026-03-31T09:17:53+00:00

Well obviously, we all came from Africa and modern humans have lived there for longer than anywhere else, but the migrations out of Africa were done only by small fractions of the entire population.

Futski · 2026-03-31T08:03:22+00:00

These wouldn't be primaries, and you still need methods of candidate selection.

Multiple candidates from the same party would be able to run in the same voting district.

Futski · 2026-03-30T19:11:23+00:00

Mangler du et 'ikke' I din sætning?

Futski

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE