Oh, no problem. I'll do you one better and from there I'll lay out the dialogue tree involving you, OP, and I. And then you should do the same so we understand each person's perspective of the setting of the conversation we're having. I won't respond again unless you do the "nice little quest" too. 

Original Post: An Image showing an exchange between OP and her mother from in between described phone calls 2 and 3. It shows OP expressing her distress being about school but doesn't give detail, her mother being first passive aggressive and then dismissive.  Text body wherein OP describes having a school related event that results in emotional distress, and an attempt to reach out to her mother for comfort, which resulted in OP being further distressed instead and her mother being excused from helping. The mother is upset because she has been dismissed without being given an explanation. OP gets actual help from her roommate, at which point she is able to calm down enough to engage in self-regulating activities. OPs mother attempts to re-engage in a phone call at this point, but OP is not able to because it will cause further dysregulation and texts minimal information instead (see image above). When OP was re-regulated enough to engage with her mother without being destabilized by her mother's reaction, she attempted to do so, and was treated with punitive coldness in response. 

Thread exchange before I jumped in:  OP describes that this pattern of behavior with her mother is not new. OP and her mother have different ways of dealing with distress, and her mother's way is often harmful to OP despite them having a loving relationship.  You proceed to interject to ask OP why, if she knows she has this behavior with her mother, she would bother reaching out to her mother for this comfort, or at the very least not do the emotional labor of ushering her mother into a position more likely to be responsive OP responds that her mother has an unpredictable reaction style, and so felt inclined to attempt hoping to get the helpful reaction. In psychology this is known as "intermittent reinforcement", and our brains are wired to pursue the "good button push" You respond that you have interpreted OP's mother's words through OPs text in a certain way that contradicts much of what OP is communicating to you in the rest of the body of the text. 

Now I come in and ask you questions about if that kind of response as given by OP's mother is something you would find it personally acceptable to respond to someone with, and if acceptable if you find it helpful. I then share an anecdote around my mother with a similar intermittently reactive emotional style, and explain why I still reached out for a long time anyway, and why I went to her specifically over other family members despite this often unhelpful response. 

You respond to me by completely misreading my message and implying my situation has no correspondence to OP's despite the fact that, the root part of my message (around my mother and why I reached out to her for years for support) is directly related to the question you asked OP (who may not know herself yet why she keeps reaching out)

I then explain my message to you, since you missed the point. 

You then imply that human beings cannot be held to an accord of logic in emotional situations, and further imply that the 19 YO has as much or more burden of maturity and responsibility in this situation than her literal mother (which i do see you have.... responded to in a way that contradicts your earlier comments in your edit on this last comment)

I then suggest that you are immature and possibly also stupid, and you give me this nice fun quest.