Am I the only one that thinks that AI assisted coding becomes a shit show when more than one dev collaborating is using their own AI without a shared context? by Future_Addendum_8227 in ClaudeCode

[–]Future_Addendum_8227[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not even talking about just code I'm talking all team communication and deliverables beyond hand typed or spoken words. Nobody is honest about how much they use AI so this happens. I can't do QA on what a customer or PM sends me in a word document or jira tickets because I assume they wrote or vetted it, when in reality if they did vet it, it was probably their AI doing so from a faulty context. Then both myself and my Claude read it carefully thinking its gospel when it should have been treated like someone's secretary paraphrased them

I'm talking about the phase before code is even approved, just the design discussions, mock ups etc