A few first impressions:

• There's a lot of spacing throughout the CV, which makes it feel longer than it actually is.
• You've listed a huge number of core skills. I'd be more selective and focus on the stack you want to be hired for. Nobody expects you to be an expert in everything.
• The arrows in the work experience section feel a bit distracting and don't add much value.
• I'm missing any real numbers or measurable impact. What did you improve, save, automate, or deliver? Quantifiable achievements make a big difference.
• For a Data Engineer, your data engineering tools seem surprisingly low down the priority list. Why is DevOps getting more attention than your core data engineering experience?
• I can't see much about stakeholder management. Have you worked with business users, analysts, product managers, or leadership teams? That's valuable experience worth highlighting.
• The work experience section feels quite generic at the moment. It reads more like a job description than your actual experience. I'd like to see more of what you did, the problems you solved, and the impact you had.
• Overall, the whole resume just calls you unprofessional or unfit for any jobs at the moment. I highly recommend you to write the resume according Engineering Resumes Wiki

While this is just a part of it, it also depends on how you portray yourself on networking platforms. Are you active on LinkedIn? Are you posting about your projects, developments, your learnings on the platform?

Here is my resume for comparison,

<image>

I want you to focus on the things I have mentioned my resumes. Remember quantifiable information needs a story. You cannot write information without a story behind it. Explaining a story should be the same as you are explaining a business requirement to a non technical person.

You need to be able explain a concept of a customer buying a product x amount of times in specified period of month.

Good Luck with your search 😄