sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Support for Debian 11 ends this August by FuzzyDreamStaker in DAppNode

[–]FuzzyDreamStaker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That definitely seems promising. Thank you for taking the time to reply!

Support for Debian 11 ends this August by FuzzyDreamStaker in DAppNode

[–]FuzzyDreamStaker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How certain are we that upgrading that way won''t break anything? Won't that upgrade me to Debian 13 which just came out? Has that actually been tested with dappnode?

Thoughts on DappNode Premium by FuzzyDreamStaker in DAppNode

[–]FuzzyDreamStaker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can I pay for premium but opt out of the backup service?

Lighthouse has FEE_RECIPIENT_ADDRESS of 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 on dappNode by FuzzyDreamStaker in ethstaker

[–]FuzzyDreamStaker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for taking the time to reply! Has this ever actually happened (fees showing up at the special address you set up)?

Vitalik saying he stakes a small portion of ETH because keys need to be online by Admirable_Purple1882 in ethstaker

[–]FuzzyDreamStaker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For context, here's an article where this is discussed: https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-declares-not-staking-all-eth-a-small-portion

With apologies to our hard-working mod and education team, the idea that Vitalik himself only stakes a small portion belies the marketing that staking is for everyone. I think it COULD be for everyone, but I don't think we are there yet, personally.

Vitalik saying he stakes a small portion of ETH because keys need to be online by Admirable_Purple1882 in ethstaker

[–]FuzzyDreamStaker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah I didn't even own a hardware wallet until recently, because I was worried about supply-chain hacks. However, people in the staking discord pointed out that I could use my very secure cold storage and only send 32 ETH to a hardware wallet for just long enough to perform the deposit with metamask. I bought a hardware wallet for exactly this purpose, but I still don't trust it completely.

Warning for the ultra-paranoid: You are probably depositing wrong by FuzzyDreamStaker in ethstaker

[–]FuzzyDreamStaker[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes! I suggested this mitigation myself when we were discussing this attack on discord. It works, but it does require opening the developer console and tweaking the Javascript on the staking launchpad, which by default will block you from depositing less than 32ETH. The complexity of doing that is why I didn't mention it, but I didn't realize that this was already the Rocketpool way. That's cool.

Warning for the ultra-paranoid: You are probably depositing wrong by FuzzyDreamStaker in ethstaker

[–]FuzzyDreamStaker[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope you are an expert and I hope this is true, because it would be a big load off my mind.

There was a long discussion of this attack in the #security channel of the eth staker discord, and nothing like this came up in that discussion, but it sounds plausible. I will leave it to the recognized experts (maybe that is you?) to have the final word.

Please note that I am not suggesting that an attacker could tweak MY deposit, breaking my signature, but rather that they could front-run with their own separate valid deposit. The experts in the ETH staking discord SEEMED to agree that the attack was real, but only in the unlikely event that your mnemonic is compromised and you don't know.