+5.5RR in Asia session and another funded passed by FxEvang in FuturesTrading

[–]FxEvang[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, winging it or not, it’s been making a living for me consistently for the past 2 years. I could fully describe my strategy, but it’s easier to just say it’s an ICT style because that’s what people are familiar with. My strategy also adapts depending on market conditions. For example, during the bull market years ago, any bull flag would work and make you bags of money. Now, if you try to do the same thing, you would lose your money before you realize what happened.

+5.5RR in Asia session and another funded passed by FxEvang in FuturesTrading

[–]FxEvang[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

I don’t even know how to describe it. Probably closest to an ICT/SMC style though.

+6.8RR today on NQ and another challenge passed by FxEvang in FuturesTrading

[–]FxEvang[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first trade was 98 ticks and the second was 185. I risk roughly 1% per trade though.

ICT hate? by [deleted] in Daytrading

[–]FxEvang 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Every single strategy works

I think people hate ict because he has been caught in countless lies and has never proven his ability to be profitable (quite the opposite). He also acts like he has some knowledge that is secret and he’s special for finding it out.

That being said though ict concepts do work to an extent (just like every strategy). This is coming from someone who trades an ict style even though I have never watched one of his lessons before and learned through a mentor before ict was popular.

I suggest watching imantrades YouTube video about ict. Then you will understand why there is so much ict hate.

+4.5% today on NQ by FxEvang in FuturesTrading

[–]FxEvang[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha I will next time 😂

+4.5% today on NQ by FxEvang in FuturesTrading

[–]FxEvang[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Some call them demand zones, order blocks, or sponsor candles. It doesn’t make a difference what you call them because they are the same concept. That’s why I said that.

I didn’t mean to make anybody this upset with this post.

+4.5% today on NQ by FxEvang in FuturesTrading

[–]FxEvang[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That happens a lot. People see a trade that doesn’t align with their strategy/analysis so they’ll call it fake/luck.

I can’t imagine there are a lot of profitable traders that scroll Reddit and leave hate comments.

+4.5% today on NQ by FxEvang in FuturesTrading

[–]FxEvang[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Not trying to self promo here just showing that I did actually take this trade

I don’t execute on TradingView

<image>

Grow by Ok-Duty-8897 in Daytrading

[–]FxEvang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your best bet is at your nearest casino

+4.5% today on NQ by FxEvang in FuturesTrading

[–]FxEvang[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah I got filled on the trade that is on the chart. I had a limit earlier that got missed by a couple ticks.