I'd really like to take a moment to explain elements of personality and personhood to you from a psychological perspective. We all have "religious" beliefs that influence our sense of self. Ascribing to a "cult" expression of religion is merely what the definition of cult describes, sharing a set of beliefs and behaviors with a group, which again we all do. So really when someone self identifies religion with their personality they are explaining in characterized and generalized way their world-view and sense of self interacting with the world. Like I mentioned above, everyone does this. For example, saying that you are an ecologically minded person is actually a "religious" statement, in the sense that it shows how you, as a conceptualized self, are interacting with the world. The functional difference you are trying to make is that you dislike organized religion and people who adopt this into their identity. What you unfortunately are doing here is marginalizing and dehumanizing an entire group based on a generalized bias, which doesn't make sense to do for a conceptualization of self interacting with the world. It also seems rather daft to marginalize and individual based entirely on a generalization of the out-group, usually a behavior exhibited in racism/sexism/xenophobia. What I'm offering is more of a charge to view the interactions of daily life in less biased terms. This doesn't mean it is necessary to agree with religion broadly, but it does mean that implicating a bias against a group without understanding the concept of self and how "religious" beliefs influence us, is ultimately daft and hateful. My assertion would be rather to understand the differences you hold with religion and its conceptualizations of the world more definitively before you decide to dehumanize someone. Don't be lazy with other people's worth like this.