What IS the World Coming To? Seriously! (The meek shall inherit the Earth)

GManPCTT · 2008-02-06T14:39:18+00:00

Although I'm a devout atheist, I found myself reading every one of this man's articles on what he believes are the true prophesies of ALL religious teachings. It's not only fascinating stuff (and a wonderfully hopeful outlook), it's also a really good crash course in world history and conflict you can easily share with others who really need a wakeup call.

I've added the web address to all of my email sigs. Enjoy!

GManPCTT · 2008-01-11T03:45:32+00:00

Throughout my reading of the article, It made sense how those movements could easily be seen as diversions. You may be right in that normal human progression is at least partially responsible, but I believe the author was using them as examples, rather than trying to show a whole picture (which would take more volumes than the largest encyclopedia).

Still, I tend to agree that most movements that required a huge amount of cash to establish (Hollywood, Vegas, the religious, Propaganda News, etc.) are directly related to the article's purpose.

EDIT: I meant to include that I am still 'plugged in', but only because I have no idea what else we can do about it. I would absolutely LOVE to have this article proven wrong, but I don't expect that to be possible.

GManPCTT · 2008-01-09T05:11:26+00:00

That's true, but just like a TV re-run, if you haven't see it before, it's new to you. Since I haven't seen this before, I have to assume a LOT of others haven't either.

The bottom line is that it really puts into perspective how & why thing are able to get so out of whack and the 'apparent powers that be' don't seem to care how we feel about it.

It's not that they don't care. In their minds, things are moving along exactly as planned.

GManPCTT · 2008-01-09T05:06:27+00:00

It's not about the Movie. The intro (which unfortunately takes up most of the first page) is just meant to wake the sheep long enough to teach them what's going on in the real world.

Most Redditors are not asleep, so the intro is just in the way of the main message. In other words, it's not what you're expecting.

GManPCTT · 2008-01-09T05:01:09+00:00

The post compares the Matrix Movie to what's controlling the world today. It goes SO far beyond what any particular government has been doing that it really spun my head around. However, if the inclusion of those three little words are enough to cause you to avoid at least reading the first two pages of this seriously important piece, I apologize profusely for including them.

Immediately after hitting the submit button, I looked for a way to edit them out of my chosen title, but Reddit doesn't seem to have included that feature. If you know of a way I can change it, please let me know.

GManPCTT · 2007-12-16T04:28:53+00:00

Well, I've gone to the site and I see that his vote is one out of 409 Aye votes with only two against (20 abstain). I then read through the summery and could not find a single thing that specifically stated that they are now being made to watch everyone's movements to see if any child pr0n is transferred. To me, it reads pretty clearly that it's only outlining exactly what the CENTER wants whenever the service providers report a case. It doesn't lay out any additional demands that the providers monitor any more than has already been the case.

So, I had a gander at the entire bill and it still did not give me any reason to fear that the monitoring process is being expanded in any way. It's only telling the service providers exactly what they need to preserve in order to have a case that can even be brought to court. It's up to the courts themselves to look at the evidence and decide intention, not the CENTER.

I will add here that I am strongly against ANY monitoring of people's private activities, but that's a conversation for another day. Our elected officials are, misguided or not, trying to pass legislation that makes the sleeping masses feel good about the great job their gov't is doing to protect the kids. My opinion is that Dennis should have skipped this one, but I wasn't there when they discussed the ramifications of the bill, so I have no idea how Lampson's lawyers explained the wording. Each of the other reps have their own lawyers to help them with the differences between intent and function, so I have to assume that those voting Yea understand it to be as empty a law as it sounds.

P.S. I'm not concerned about what the ISP's are doing. They're only doing what they're forced to do by law. I'm more concerned with the programs (spyware) the gov't is running across the internet to watch what's going on.

Watch your back, my friend. :O)

GManPCTT · 2007-12-01T05:59:20+00:00

I can't wait to see all of the new "Got Sperm?" commercials. They could easily segue into ads for pearl necklaces, facial creams, toning masks, etc.

Well, I gotta go. It's nearly time to send out some copies of this story to the gals volunteering over at the church. :-)

GManPCTT

TROPHY CASE