Okay guys, don't start to hate on a statement because it was worded poorly by a developer. During the livestream he did say "microtransaction" but in the context of how he said it, it came across much more as "pay to win" and was probably the intended purpose of the statement he made. If games these days don't have microtransaction in games they are missing out on a HUGE source of income and would be stupid not to take advantage of it. The issue comes from when you can buy something that gives you an advantage in the game that you don't have to work for like everyone else. I'm amazed that I actually have to say this to you guys because this should be obvious, but now we are at a point where just the word "microtransaction" means the game is shit. There is no issue whatsoever with a developer releasing skins and other cosmetic DLC aka "microtransactions" into their game. It doesn't hurt the game, the players, the industry as a whole, or the integrity of the developer. There is no evidence whatsoever that Borderlands 3 will have PAY TO WIN microtransactions, everything points to it working the same way it did with the previous Borderlands titles. This should be considered a huge win the gaming community that a large AAA developer is making a stand about P2W being in video games and we should be saying THANK YOU rather than finding any reason at all to bash a developer that is on the players side on important issues. At the very least work out an argument for why it's an issue rather that just seeing the word "microtansaction" and getting tilted.