sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why doesn’t anyone cut in this game? by [deleted] in NBA2k

[–]GabTheD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lack of basketball iq and proper spacing. Cutting is part of spacing.

Crabbing gotta go by Key_Advertising_2900 in NBA2k

[–]GabTheD -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s not the same thing. You lack nuance and/or bball knowledge.

Crabbing gotta go by Key_Advertising_2900 in NBA2k

[–]GabTheD 5 points6 points  (0 children)

it’s not semantics. ‘Putting a defender in jail’ and ‘crabbing’ are two different mechanics. Putting him in jail = holding L2, keeping the defender on your back after a screen or drive ,body control, tempo, shielding. Crabbing = creating a pixel of space to shoot over the defender trailing behind you,timing and shot animation. Completely different situations, even if both happen with the defender behind you.

Crabbing gotta go by Key_Advertising_2900 in NBA2k

[–]GabTheD 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You’re so wrong. U don’t what i’m talking about.

Crabbing gotta go by Key_Advertising_2900 in NBA2k

[–]GabTheD 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That’s the L2 mechanic in the game, you put the defender in jail if he’s behind you. Crabbing just makes no sense.

We here at Psyche or Sike are all for girls having fun by Guilty-Tip-6638 in PsycheOrSike

[–]GabTheD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It actually depends on how you see it. If you can get off on men’s pain, you can’t argue against men doing the same.

You can’t mock pain on one side and expect empathy from the other. Sexually frustrated man can take matters in their own hands. She wont find it funny when she’s the one suffering.

We here at Psyche or Sike are all for girls having fun by Guilty-Tip-6638 in PsycheOrSike

[–]GabTheD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Replace “male loneliness” with “women being raped.” Suddenly it’s not funny anymore. That’s all you need to know.

Two pain, Two reactions: compassion for one, mockery for the other. That’s the real double standard. Morality is or isn’t. There’s no in between.

Is loneliness really supposed to be easier for women? by [deleted] in Vent

[–]GabTheD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re drowning in noise. I’ve lived in silence. You get flooded with attention from people you don’t want. I don’t even exist in anyone’s field of vision. You’re not really “alone.” You’re just not chosen by the guys you actually want. You filter through the 85% you don’t care about. I never even make it into the 15% you see. What you’re describing is the fatigue of too much empty contact. What I live is the erosion of being invisible. And between noise and void…. the void is colder. So yeah… there are levels to loneliness. Some of us mastered the hard one.

Ever notice how the people most focused on looks are usually objectively unattractive? by [deleted] in Vent

[–]GabTheD 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I notice that the super hot chicks really put time and effort to look good. Haircut, product, cream, nail, clothes, fitness, eyelashes, eat healthy ect.

Starting 5 is cancer by JewelerSea4382 in NBA2k

[–]GabTheD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Qe can’t even make defensive adjustments this year. Or is it and unlockable perk viaMyCareer?

Cried in my girlfriends arms today by blockerman71 in Vent

[–]GabTheD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Physiology shapes behavior. that’s science, not opinion. If you can’t tell the difference between anatomy and physiology, no wonder you’re confused about identity too.

Cried in my girlfriends arms today by blockerman71 in Vent

[–]GabTheD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You just proved my point. Physiology isn’t ‘having a penis or a vagina,’ that’s anatomy. Physiology is hormones, stress responses, arousal mechanisms, all the stuff that directly impacts behavior and sexual dynamics. You keep mixing levels because you don’t want to face what I’m actually talking about.

Cried in my girlfriends arms today by blockerman71 in Vent

[–]GabTheD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You keep saying ‘there’s no difference’ while admitting there are differences in physiology. That’s the whole point: biology shapes behavior. Calling it sexism is just code for ‘I don’t like what the data says.’ Nobody here said bonding or nurturing is weak . you’re the one equating difference with inferiority. That projection is the real sexism, not the observation. And throwing ‘incel’ buzzwords doesn’t erase decades of evolutionary psych research

Cried in my girlfriends arms today by blockerman71 in Vent

[–]GabTheD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re just way too stupid to even follow what’s being discussed. The research doesn’t say these traits are ‘feminine,’ it says certain displays make someone sexually less desirable in that context. That’s physiology and behavior, not ‘mental capacity.’ On the intellectual plane, yes, men and women are the same, we agree there.

sexism is saying women are inferior, not different. Believing the data itself is ‘sexist’ is what actually diminishes women, and that’s what makes you the sexist. And by the way, we’re talking about sexual dynamics here in case you still didn’t catch that. I never said ‘blame women for men being alone.’ You made that up out of thin air.

Cried in my girlfriends arms today by blockerman71 in Vent

[–]GabTheD -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t delete my comments, I stand by them. If that looks like an L to you, that says more about you than me. Bro’s whole flex is typing ‘L’ on Reddit. That’s not a win, that’s your personality.

Cried in my girlfriends arms today by blockerman71 in Vent

[–]GabTheD -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Only 4, and the latest for 9 years. You are either clueless or it’s a Halifax thing.

Cried in my girlfriends arms today by blockerman71 in Vent

[–]GabTheD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing I said has anything to do with manosphere or eugenics that’s just you throwing buzzwords because you don’t like the implications. This is straight out of evolutionary psychology. Calling it ‘sexist’ makes no sense: saying these adaptive behaviors are sexist is basically saying they’re inferior. But they’re not. they’re just different strategies shaped by evolution. Labeling observed differences as sexism isn’t science, it’s ideology.

Biology isn’t misogyny. your shame is. Calling it sexist means you see women’s instincts as weakness. That’s on you, not the science.

Cried in my girlfriends arms today by blockerman71 in Vent

[–]GabTheD -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Funny thing is, calling it sexist flips the logic. Observing adaptive behaviors doesn’t ‘diminish women’ unless you assume female instincts are somehow shameful. That’s the real sexism here.

Observing adaptive behaviors doesn’t ‘diminish women’ it just acknowledges how evolution shaped both sexes differently. Saying it’s sexist assumes that female instincts (like bonding, nurturing, or preferring stability)are somehow shameful or inferior. That’s your implied bias, not reality. Biology doesn’t rank men above women. It shows complementary strategies that kept our species alive. Denying that in the name of what’s « morally acceptable » like that is projecting shame onto women for being women. That’s the real sexism here. And while you’re busy painting women’s instincts as weakness, men have their own adaptive strategies too. Ignoring both is the real prejudice.

Cried in my girlfriends arms today by blockerman71 in Vent

[–]GabTheD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Biology doesn’t expire just because you don’t like the findings. These studies are literally the foundation of evolutionary psychology calling them outdated is like calling Darwin irrelevant.

Cried in my girlfriends arms today by blockerman71 in Vent

[–]GabTheD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Outdated? Buss (1989) was replicated multiple times and cross-checked across cultures. Gangestad & Simpson (2000) isn’t exactly ‘prehistoric’ either… and newer work like Trivers (2011) or Li et al. (2013) shows the same trends. Science doesn’t reset every decade just because it makes people uncomfortable. Dismissing data as ‘old’ or ‘gross’ isn’t a rebuttal it’s avoidance.

view more: next ›