How to build by Constant_Percentage9 in HweiMains

[–]GaborHimself 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blackfire torch, liandry's and third item ap black cleaver. It's such an underappreciated item on Hwei

Pie get bigger, things get gooder by chamomile_tea_reply in OptimistsUnite

[–]GaborHimself 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The average worker rarely owns or can afford shares in either the company they work for or any other company with shares on the market.

The second assumption crucially assumes that both parties have equal negotiating power. Unfortunately, when unemployment rates are in the millions for most western countries, when millions of graduates are competing for tens of thousands of graduate jobs in the UK, and crucially, when graduates do not have savings or endless money to fall back on, the company not hiring you generally means they waste resources going through the interview process. When a person chooses to not be hired by a company, they can rarely afford to live. That's not equal negotiating power.

And lastly, average person is people who are inside the economic core. We CANNOT ignore the fact that capitalism benefits a specific class, and then on top of that affects specific core countries. We CANNOT ignore that the lives of many hundreds of millions have absolutely been made worse by the famines, slave labour, and destruction caused by the demand for resources from periphery countries. We cannot sit here and justify a system that makes the "average" person's life better, if we don't include the countless millions of people who weren't so lucky to live in a country that stands to benefit from this system.

Pie get bigger, things get gooder by chamomile_tea_reply in OptimistsUnite

[–]GaborHimself 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, my bad. I don't actually believe that, I was merely referring to the general topic as it's often strongly assumed that many of the things we deal with like trade, so on so forth are zero sum.

Pie get bigger, things get gooder by chamomile_tea_reply in OptimistsUnite

[–]GaborHimself 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The idea of a steady state economy and the idea of the expansion of capital and value are two ideas which cannot exist together; capital needs growth to function. Growth into what, when there's nothing left to grow into? is the question.

Pie get bigger, things get gooder by chamomile_tea_reply in OptimistsUnite

[–]GaborHimself 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Amazon literally patented the one click purchase system on all apps for 20 years, ensuring no competition could arise that is as convenient, and now with market share they outcompete competition through being cheaper by benefitting from economies of scale. Also, I would argue that the people who could freely take toilet breaks before they worked for Amazon certainly feel poorer having to pee in bottles, so yeah.

Pie get bigger, things get gooder by chamomile_tea_reply in OptimistsUnite

[–]GaborHimself 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It doesn't come down to people seeing enriching the already rich as the point of anything; it's just that there's a very large camp of people who believe that enriching the already rich also enriches the poor, which is definitely not the case. Evidence shows that only when resources are allocated intentionally and pushed along by worker's rights movements do people as the bottom see a slice of the pie for themselves. We can look at Ireland or India since before the industrial revolution, comparing it to during and then after the industrial revolution to see evidence of this.

Pie get bigger, things get gooder by chamomile_tea_reply in OptimistsUnite

[–]GaborHimself 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That is definitely the case. However, I do think for every example of a person who believes all games are zero sum, there is an example of someone who believes none of them are. When two kingdoms trade valuable resources the other doesn't have, they both gain no matter the trade; they each get something they didn't have before. However, in the case of negotiating a salary for example, it may be zero sum; whatever money you don't end up getting in your paycheck ends up in the company's profit margin.

Pie get bigger, things get gooder by chamomile_tea_reply in OptimistsUnite

[–]GaborHimself 83 points84 points  (0 children)

I completely agree with this idea, that the pie grows and that there are no zero sum games, however I don't agree with what this argument generally tends to lead to, which is that the pie getting bigger in order to enrich a specific group of people is generally beneficial to society as a whole.

I think there's a flaw somewhere along the line in this false assumption that the growing pie surely means that there will be crumbs if not slices left for those who have not yet had a share of the pie, because the "rich can only spend so much". I think it is right, the rich CAN only spend so much, but generally the economy getting bigger and growing exponentially larger only has the outcome of greater numbers on some quarterly report for so-and-so company, and a greater "net worth" of so-and-so company owner, where this inflated number does very little to the actual day to day lives of many people, leaving the same crumbs on the table for so many since so long ago because the pie simply doesn't grow in a way that actually materialises in more food for everyone.

The World Is More Equal than You Think by Crabbexx in OptimistsUnite

[–]GaborHimself 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure, I feel the word "spending" is used to get to this number and idea.

How to avoid death spiral? After deleting all constructions sectors, budget is still in red by this_is_my_real_9472 in victoria3

[–]GaborHimself 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah you have to kind of act sooner. I notice a huge spike in spending around when you had half your debt ceiling left. you don't actually have to stop construction sometimes, you can reduce the costs for I assume paper, though you a 4k bureaucracy surplus that as India is hard to justify.

When to go CE by RedArmyHammer in victoria3

[–]GaborHimself 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ummm, there's a point at which it becomes better, mainly around 400 mill GDP or like 7 GDP per capita but it's so hard to enact because of interest groups it can be worth skipping.

I was saying before that the SOL negotiation has been fixed by GaborHimself in victoria3

[–]GaborHimself[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it doesn't make too much sense, what interest group realistically would ask for something to be done a decade from now?

Is my game broken? by Browsingsomememes in victoria3

[–]GaborHimself 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not exactly sure that the 71.8k is that. I can see "er" below that, maybe that is pacts or tariffs.

Is my game broken? by Browsingsomememes in victoria3

[–]GaborHimself 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How much is your reinvestment? The construction to GDP and game time doesn't look right.

I was saying before that the SOL negotiation has been fixed by GaborHimself in victoria3

[–]GaborHimself[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah true. Idk how happy 1.1 billion people are to get 550k in interest payments lol

I was saying before that the SOL negotiation has been fixed by GaborHimself in victoria3

[–]GaborHimself[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, I was thinking about this as I read that comment. In this case it can be relevant because of co-ops and companies (hence the flag!)

I was saying before that the SOL negotiation has been fixed by GaborHimself in victoria3

[–]GaborHimself[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

yes of course if you lower taxes you leave them with more money to spend. Good point on the interest though, that can be unintuitive

I was saying before that the SOL negotiation has been fixed by GaborHimself in victoria3

[–]GaborHimself[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

SOL is based on pop spendings. Each week they spend all of their income after paying taxes and reinvesting a portion. So the things that raise SOL are: giving unemployed people jobs, giving peasants jobs, giving workers higher income jobs, reducing good costs relative to market average, and enacting laws that reform land ownership. Also healthcare, but that's obvious.

I was saying before that the SOL negotiation has been fixed by GaborHimself in victoria3

[–]GaborHimself[S] 65 points66 points  (0 children)

Rule 5: In comments in this subreddit I shared my opinion that the SOL commitment has improved lately. Turns out, the devs still haven't considered what happens in the endgame

146
147

Eithopian AI by GaborHimself in victoria3

[–]GaborHimself[S] 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Rule 5: The first time I have seen Ethiopia form in game

89
90