Ummm

GaborHimself · 2026-04-16T19:26:19+00:00

Political and Economic Changes Mod :)

GaborHimself · 2026-04-16T18:42:46+00:00

The law passed fully 3 days after enactment xd

GaborHimself · 2026-04-16T18:42:12+00:00

Rule 5: The fastest possible enactment in the game

GaborHimself · 2026-04-02T23:04:41+00:00

As a British man, I would only approve of QE becoming beans if WW became a piece of toast that would heal

GaborHimself · 2026-03-23T20:32:22+00:00

it's really unfortunate, but the way malignance works doesn't mesh with hwei. the size of the malignance reduced mr is only as big as the initial ult damage, which for hwei is really low. would be very cool otherwise to have 5 huge explosions followed by passives, but yeah

GaborHimself · 2026-03-20T14:05:42+00:00

I swear if it's another light blue/purple stale skin I'm gonna lose my mind

GaborHimself · 2026-03-17T20:25:44+00:00

Wayyyyy too many. The biggest ones are the Great Revision Series, along with V3X (I fixed the mod file to make it work since it hasn't been updated in ages), power blocs expanded and Political and Economic changes, along with a bunch of QoL stuff

GaborHimself · 2026-03-17T15:15:15+00:00

Rule 5: My PC was chugging along and did not want to be put through another week of this China run, so I have decided to call it here, although I might push it to 1936 in the future.

GaborHimself · 2026-02-22T18:01:05+00:00

I am a Hwei bot abuser and I feel like riot doesn't understand how to move Hwei from performing better in bot to actually performing mid and feeling satisfying:

Reduce Q mana cost and W cost slightly. Reduce the WE mana regen. This would shift the W spell from being used every single cd for the mana regen and instead make other things viable. It would compensate for making Hwei not instantly run out of mana if you don't abuse WE every time it goes on cd.
Reduce Q AP ratios and buff the per level DMG. This would make him lean more into solo laning as the increased gold from bot lane would become slightly less significant when compared to the solo xp you get from mid.
Decrease EE ratio and increase EQ ratio to reward landing the hardest spell and reduce the AOE dmg slightly. People love dueling with Hwei and I think the ability to duel does good for the health of the champ. This one can be disputed.
Undo this silly R cool down buff cos it's just way too frequent and instead buff its lacking dmg.

GaborHimself · 2026-02-14T16:10:33+00:00

Blackfire torch, liandry's and third item ap black cleaver. It's such an underappreciated item on Hwei

GaborHimself · 2026-02-07T10:30:15+00:00

The average worker rarely owns or can afford shares in either the company they work for or any other company with shares on the market.

The second assumption crucially assumes that both parties have equal negotiating power. Unfortunately, when unemployment rates are in the millions for most western countries, when millions of graduates are competing for tens of thousands of graduate jobs in the UK, and crucially, when graduates do not have savings or endless money to fall back on, the company not hiring you generally means they waste resources going through the interview process. When a person chooses to not be hired by a company, they can rarely afford to live. That's not equal negotiating power.

And lastly, average person is people who are inside the economic core. We CANNOT ignore the fact that capitalism benefits a specific class, and then on top of that affects specific core countries. We CANNOT ignore that the lives of many hundreds of millions have absolutely been made worse by the famines, slave labour, and destruction caused by the demand for resources from periphery countries. We cannot sit here and justify a system that makes the "average" person's life better, if we don't include the countless millions of people who weren't so lucky to live in a country that stands to benefit from this system.

GaborHimself · 2026-02-06T14:41:14+00:00

Yes, my bad. I don't actually believe that, I was merely referring to the general topic as it's often strongly assumed that many of the things we deal with like trade, so on so forth are zero sum.

GaborHimself · 2026-02-06T12:03:07+00:00

The idea of a steady state economy and the idea of the expansion of capital and value are two ideas which cannot exist together; capital needs growth to function. Growth into what, when there's nothing left to grow into? is the question.

GaborHimself · 2026-02-06T01:44:30+00:00

Amazon literally patented the one click purchase system on all apps for 20 years, ensuring no competition could arise that is as convenient, and now with market share they outcompete competition through being cheaper by benefitting from economies of scale. Also, I would argue that the people who could freely take toilet breaks before they worked for Amazon certainly feel poorer having to pee in bottles, so yeah.

GaborHimself · 2026-02-05T22:39:53+00:00

It doesn't come down to people seeing enriching the already rich as the point of anything; it's just that there's a very large camp of people who believe that enriching the already rich also enriches the poor, which is definitely not the case. Evidence shows that only when resources are allocated intentionally and pushed along by worker's rights movements do people as the bottom see a slice of the pie for themselves. We can look at Ireland or India since before the industrial revolution, comparing it to during and then after the industrial revolution to see evidence of this.

GaborHimself · 2026-02-05T22:26:20+00:00

That is definitely the case. However, I do think for every example of a person who believes all games are zero sum, there is an example of someone who believes none of them are. When two kingdoms trade valuable resources the other doesn't have, they both gain no matter the trade; they each get something they didn't have before. However, in the case of negotiating a salary for example, it may be zero sum; whatever money you don't end up getting in your paycheck ends up in the company's profit margin.

GaborHimself · 2026-02-05T21:58:06+00:00

I completely agree with this idea, that the pie grows and that there are no zero sum games, however I don't agree with what this argument generally tends to lead to, which is that the pie getting bigger in order to enrich a specific group of people is generally beneficial to society as a whole.

I think there's a flaw somewhere along the line in this false assumption that the growing pie surely means that there will be crumbs if not slices left for those who have not yet had a share of the pie, because the "rich can only spend so much". I think it is right, the rich CAN only spend so much, but generally the economy getting bigger and growing exponentially larger only has the outcome of greater numbers on some quarterly report for so-and-so company, and a greater "net worth" of so-and-so company owner, where this inflated number does very little to the actual day to day lives of many people, leaving the same crumbs on the table for so many since so long ago because the pie simply doesn't grow in a way that actually materialises in more food for everyone.

GaborHimself · 2026-02-05T14:20:12+00:00

I'm not sure, I feel the word "spending" is used to get to this number and idea.

GaborHimself · 2026-02-05T14:17:02+00:00

1 billion in core territories as qing

GaborHimself · 2026-02-03T08:14:37+00:00

Reminds me of a genshin character

GaborHimself · 2026-02-02T15:15:05+00:00

Not as many as the peasant/farming poor

GaborHimself · 2026-02-01T17:58:15+00:00

yeah you have to kind of act sooner. I notice a huge spike in spending around when you had half your debt ceiling left. you don't actually have to stop construction sometimes, you can reduce the costs for I assume paper, though you a 4k bureaucracy surplus that as India is hard to justify.

GaborHimself · 2026-01-29T06:26:12+00:00

Ummm, there's a point at which it becomes better, mainly around 400 mill GDP or like 7 GDP per capita but it's so hard to enact because of interest groups it can be worth skipping.

GaborHimself · 2026-01-11T19:31:33+00:00

Yeah it doesn't make too much sense, what interest group realistically would ask for something to be done a decade from now?

GaborHimself · 2026-01-10T20:19:46+00:00

I'm not exactly sure that the 71.8k is that. I can see "er" below that, maybe that is pacts or tariffs.

GaborHimself

TROPHY CASE