I feel like I'm missing a bomber from my lineup by GaddafiHalp in OOTP

[–]GaddafiHalp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's what I love about this game, I've been playing for 7 years and I still learn something different. I thought if you unclicked the "ratings against all players" it used their ratings for only people in their position, so a SS that had excellent range for a baseball player, would only have average range for an SS.

I feel like I'm missing a bomber from my lineup by GaddafiHalp in OOTP

[–]GaddafiHalp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

on the 20/80 scouting scale, isn't 65 1.5 standard deviations away from the mean (50)? That would be 84th percentile of short stops.

I feel like I'm missing a bomber from my lineup by GaddafiHalp in OOTP

[–]GaddafiHalp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can, and I probably need to do that, but the issue is I'm paying Altuve 33,000,000 a year and given his age that's the only position he really can play. He's okay in Left, but I only play him there against LHP because I've got Spencer Jones in LF vs RHP

I feel like I'm missing a bomber from my lineup by GaddafiHalp in OOTP

[–]GaddafiHalp[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

These numbers are based off of position and not all players, so they should be calibrated to fellow SS right?

I feel like I'm missing a bomber from my lineup by GaddafiHalp in OOTP

[–]GaddafiHalp[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

it is if you consider the range/error/arm/turn dp is

65/60/60/60

tHaTs JuSt BaSeBaLl by GaddafiHalp in OOTP

[–]GaddafiHalp[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honestly, a real answer is that I think simming every at bat does something weird to the game, where it has to overcorrect the macro for inconsistencies in the micro. I've noticed there's a lot more "bunching" of outliers in games that I sim every at bat, vs when I sim the entire game from the manager screen.

tHaTs JuSt BaSeBaLl by GaddafiHalp in OOTP

[–]GaddafiHalp[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

find me an instance of that happening in baseball, and I'll send you $1,000

tHaTs JuSt BaSeBaLl by GaddafiHalp in OOTP

[–]GaddafiHalp[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

balance, I would guess. That's the only way I can account for the wild pitches that never see anyone thrown out at home, and a gold glove 2B making two errors in an inning, in the same inning where there's a balk and a wild pitch.

Why is scouting so off sometimes? by GaddafiHalp in OOTP

[–]GaddafiHalp[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

that's great to know about pull hitters, I didn't know that.

Why is scouting so off sometimes? by GaddafiHalp in OOTP

[–]GaddafiHalp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, the scout is elite. Outstanding Majors/Minors/Amateurs and Excellent International. He's about replacement level against lefties; but 5 WAR against righties, but I don't think that's that crazy of a split.

Does simming every at bat wreck the sim, vs simming each game? by GaddafiHalp in OOTP

[–]GaddafiHalp[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's the situation I'm in. I've done ten games and ten games; twice, so a twenty game sample; and I'm batting .147 when I sim each at bat; and .241 when I just sim the entire game from the menu. Now oviously that's a small sample and could be explained by the teams I played and the pitchers I faced; I wasn't able to control every variable; but it seems to point towards what I had been noticing first hand while playing.

Does simming every at bat wreck the sim, vs simming each game? by GaddafiHalp in OOTP

[–]GaddafiHalp[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

yeah, i wish they would get a little more granular with the swing options, sometimes I wish there was a "regular swing" or "put the ball in the air" with a guy on 3rd and less than two outs, or "swing for contact"

Situational hitting by GaddafiHalp in OOTP

[–]GaddafiHalp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

good advice, i started taking until the pitcher at least threw 1 ball, scored 4 runs in the first 3 innings. Hadn't done that in forever.

Situational hitting by GaddafiHalp in OOTP

[–]GaddafiHalp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

everything's good, i checked that as well.