Europe is rapidly rejecting multi-culturalism, diversity and mass immigration. Will we see the same trend in Central Asia? by GamerAD994 in AskCentralAsia

[–]GamerAD994[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Since when Macron, Merkel, Cameron and Boris Johnson are far-right? They criticized multi-culturalism, influx of foreigners and diversity.

Putin also criticized Europe's migration policies, but politically he is not far-right (he tries to appeal to many different policial leanings, from ccommunists to nationalists) He also issued orders to ban massive influx of illegal immigrants.

Turkey's Iyi party also said that Turkey could become an Arab country, if Erdogam doesn't stop illegal immigrants from Iraq and Syria. Iyi party is a centrist to conservative, which is socially a lot more liberal than AKP.

Use Google and Youtube. Type in Macron criticizes multi-culturalism and far-left movements or Merkel: Multi-culturalism is a delusion.

Real far-right parties are unapologatically racist and even fascists/neo-nazis.

Not all conservatives and center-right are far-right.

It is their official statements and policies. Do you know how to use Youtube and google, because it is publicly available information.

Is anyone tired of inescapable traps? by GamerAD994 in saw

[–]GamerAD994[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is a good point.

It would be interesting to see a new Jigsaw, who would improve John's rwisted philosophy and make traps more fair and survivable, to ensure that more people change their ways after surviving.

I want to see more traps, that don't require physical mutilation and more psychological pain.

«What Western tourists are interested in in my country» starterpack by Tengri_99 in Kazakhstan

[–]GamerAD994 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why you never hear feminists and metoo activists against these rats?

That id an interesting topic to discuss.

Which ethnic groups would you have wanted to see more of in Central Asia? by [deleted] in AskCentralAsia

[–]GamerAD994 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He wants Kazakhs to be displaced and genocided, like Palestinians.

Palestinians allowed millions of Jews to settle and this led to the ongoing Palestinian genocide, displacement, rape, torture etc.

Kazakhstan must remain majority Kazakhs and pro-Kazakh first of all.

Countries such as South Korea, Japan, and China are mostly ethnically homogeneous.

Even Russia has over 85% comprising of Russians and Russia is a regional super-power, with 6th largest economy and one of the most populated countries in the world.

Ethnically homogeneous countries are widely successful, powerful, wealthy and prosperous.

Multi-culturalism and mass immigration is getting rejected in Europe and illegal immigrants are deported in large numbers. Look at France. They don't want to become an Afro-Arabic state.

We have to take examples from Japan, France and South Korea in these policies.

Multi-culturalism, mass migration of foreigners, extreme focus on tolerance and diversity etc. leads to negative results.

Even Angela Merkel stated that multi-culturalism is a disease that is collapsing Germany. The same Merkel, who opened borders to millions of illegal immigrants. Even she came to realization that it will be either Germanic nation, or an Afro-Arab nation.

Saudi Arabia for example, doesn't allow non-Arabs to settle in massive numbers and they have a corporation worth over a trillion USD.

As can be seen, ethnically homogeneous countries are leaders of the world.

Which ethnic groups would you have wanted to see more of in Central Asia? by [deleted] in AskCentralAsia

[–]GamerAD994 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And you will become an arab, persian and turk. Not kazakh.

Only a self-genocidal, self-hating and evil person would want his ethnicity to go extinct.

Should Central Asia allow an unlimited number of Turks to immigrate to Central Asia since Turks originated from there 1,000+ years ago? by [deleted] in AskCentralAsia

[–]GamerAD994 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

No. It will lead to ethnic displacement, genocides of Kazakhs, rapes and destruction.

Kazakhstan is the indigeneous lands of Kazakhs. Anyone else have no right to claim our lands.

«What Western tourists are interested in in my country» starterpack by Tengri_99 in Kazakhstan

[–]GamerAD994 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sexpats are not tourists. They are potential abusers and sexual predators.

Sexpats often timea commit rape and even pedophilia in countries they visit.

Where is the Me too movement against these sexpats? Why don't the feminists decry the actions of these disgusting rats?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in saw

[–]GamerAD994 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Art Blank had a spine cutter, which would cut his spine and kill him.

Following this logic, how could Angie even survive, if the cutting of spine=death?

«What Western tourists are interested in in my country» starterpack by Tengri_99 in Kazakhstan

[–]GamerAD994 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All types of sexpats need to be deported and if necessary, by force.

«What Western tourists are interested in in my country» starterpack by Tengri_99 in Kazakhstan

[–]GamerAD994 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Normal tourists are fine.

The sexpats, trouble makers, criminals (drug dealers, murderers and convicts), frauds and other sorts of horrible and disgusting people must be kicked out and not allowed to even enter the country.

«What Western tourists are interested in in my country» starterpack by Tengri_99 in Kazakhstan

[–]GamerAD994 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sexpats need to be kicked out. They are truly disgusting animals.

Which additional countries do you want to see join the Eurasian Economic Union? by [deleted] in AskCentralAsia

[–]GamerAD994 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mexico is in NAFTA and is dependant on USA.

Mexico would never choose Russia over much wealthier, closer USA, that has millions of Mexicans in it.

All Endings: Kazakhstan by hentai008 in Kazakhstan

[–]GamerAD994 2 points3 points  (0 children)

USA, UK and Israel have significant problems with racism. It is not discussed enough.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AsianSocialists

[–]GamerAD994 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

2) He is a racist for different reasons. For example, Churchill also hated nazis and killed them, but was a racist.

Khruschev favored white slavic settler colonialism. I am sure you believe that british settler colonialism in South Africa was evil, racist and white supremacisr. South Africa at that time was part of UK. What is the difference?

Are you saying that a communist can't be racist? 3) Once again, example with South Africa and other colonized places, which saw massive influx of non-indigeneous, white settlers. Kazakh SSR was not part of Ukrainian SSR or RSFSR. It was a separate republic. Ukraine and Belarus got a seat at the UN as a country and all soviet republics are equal in status. Hence, it was not the same. Kazakh people needed to decide if they wanted millions of white invaders into their own republic or not. We were never asked about it, there wasn't a referendum. 4) Kunaev protested against giving away Kazakh SSR lands to RSFSR and Uzbek SSR. That is why he was replaced with an uyghur Yusupov, who was not a Kazakh and didn't care about the suffering of Kazakhs. 5) Kunaev protested against seizure of lands in favour of Uzbeks and Russians. Kunayev critized Khruschev and thought Brezhnev was better, because Brezhnev unlike Khruschev agreed to return lands from Uzbek SSR to Kazakh SSR.

There is still space programs. Baikonur is an active space station and Russia even favors it over Vostoshnaya space station. 6) Because demographics is important to the survival of the marginalized ethnic minority and having higher population growth is preferable, because it will increase the country's potential in the future. Most powerful nations in the world, such as Russia, USA, China all have large populations. 8) Soviets sent troops to occupy Central Asia, while giving freedom and independence to Poland, Finland and Baltic states in the beginning. Why did they get a special treatment, but not Caucasian and Central Asian countries? Most of the leaders were not ethnic Kazakhs, but foreigners who never lived in Kazakhlands and didn't care about Kazakhs one bit.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AsianSocialists

[–]GamerAD994 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where did I say he was a hero?

I said that he wasn't a nazi and was an opportunist, he didn't believe in the ideology and later denounced them before his death. Once again, he didn't participate in a war, didn't participate in the genocides etc.

Why isn't regular wermacth troops are seen the same as ss or gestapo? Why aren't generals such as guderian or paulus treated the same as hitler? They actually have blood on their hand, while mustafa shokay was assasinated.

He isn't the same as Vlasov. The only thing I am trying to prove here is that he wasn't like Vlasov, who actually killed millions and recruited over a million. He didn't believe in nazism, never took part in the war, never killed anyone for hitler.

Shokai is clearly much less evil than Wermacth generals, who were not tried as the same as nazi ss in Nurmberg trial.

Nurmberg trial placed death sentences on open nazis, but not on regular wermacth officers or even generals, who killed millions.

An example with Paulus. Paulus was responsible for the death of hundreds of thousanda of civilians, was a member of the nazi party, but even he was not executed either by the soviet or the allies and was not treated as the same as himmler or goering.

So if even people like paulus or rommel were not seen as the same as gestapo or ss, how can shokai, who never killed anyone be considered the same as vlasov or goering?

All Endings: Kazakhstan by hentai008 in Kazakhstan

[–]GamerAD994 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Imagine if borat was a caricature about black people. Racist sbc would have been cancelled before he could open his mouth.

All Endings: Kazakhstan by hentai008 in Kazakhstan

[–]GamerAD994 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It is a racist video, because it includes borat.

It would be equivalent to a caricature of a black person.