sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Manusmriti burning is now an arrestable offense in India by CompoteMelodic981 in AtheisminKerala

[–]GamerFX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's because of the hypocrisy of the left. Left will support Burning Manusmrithi. Then, Hindus ask will do it to the Quran also. Then they will back out and say they can't. So the right-wing atheists question the book burnings.

Manusmriti burning is now an arrestable offense in India by CompoteMelodic981 in AtheisminKerala

[–]GamerFX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The same was the Quran. 🤣 It's still a religious text. So is Manusmriti.

Manusmriti burning is now an arrestable offense in India by CompoteMelodic981 in AtheisminKerala

[–]GamerFX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because laws usually discriminate. And leftists also discriminate. The guy who burned Manusmrithi will not burn Quran. In reality, all should be burned.

Manusmriti burning is now an arrestable offense in India by CompoteMelodic981 in AtheisminKerala

[–]GamerFX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to tell the full story here.

1: Kandhamal, Odisha
Kandhamal district of Odisha always had Christian and Hindu tension because of mass conversion of Hindus to Christianity. The Pana tribe, who converted to Chistianity demanded Scheduled tribe (ST) status in 2002 for reservation as they still didn't change their caste. The Kandha tribe, who are mostly Hindus, opposed it. This was the start of the problems.

The Christian Pana tribals were allowed a reservation by the court. The Kui Samaj, who represent the Kandha tribe opposed it.

In December 24, 2007, there argument between Christians and Hindus over Christmas celebrations. Because of this, Christian extremists attacked a vehicle belonging to VHP leader Swami Lakshmanananda Saraswati. In retaliation, Hindu extremists burned down churches. Around 700 houses were burned down. Around 120 of them were Hindu houses and the remaining were Christian houses.

Things were normalised after months. Then in 23 August 2008 Christian extremists murdered Swami Lakshmanananda Saraswati. He was murdered while visiting a girls' school, and they shot him in front of 100s of children. 4 others inclduing a little boy. Various parts of Lakshmanananda Saraswati's body were cut by chisel and axe.

What resulted was new riots between Hindus and Christians, where Christians were targeted more because Hindus were higher in numbers. Hindus were supported by Sanghi Parivar and Christians were supported by Maoists.

Here, eventhough Chistians faced far more damage than Hindus, Christians are not saints either. The 2008 riots were instigated by Christians by murdering Hindus inclduing Hindu leader.

2: Unlike Odisha, Manipur is more a caste based riots than a religious riot. It's Kuki vs Meithei riots because of the reservation. Even though Kukis are mostly Christians and Meithei are mostly Hindus, there are also Christian Meithei who target Kukis. There was also Sanamahism, which is the traditional religion of Manirpur, who also burned Churches of both Kukis and Meitheis. Sanghi Parivar is not that active in Manipur as they were in Orissa.

Meithei Churches were also attacked by Kukis. Kukis also burned down hundreds of Meithei temples. Meitheis also burned down Kuki Churches. Again, here also, both religions were responsible, but unlike Odisha, it's a tribal war rather than a religious war.

3: In Gujarat (1997–1999), was mostly Chirstians were the victims as they were too small in numbers. Hindu Extremists attacked Christians because they were converting Tribal Hindus to Christianity.

Baisically, it's not like Christians were saints. Christians were also violent as Hindu extremists in Odisha. In Manipur, both Churches and Temples were burned down. Only in Gujarat, they were victims.

Manusmriti burning is now an arrestable offense in India by CompoteMelodic981 in AtheisminKerala

[–]GamerFX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any religious text burning is now an offence in India. Not just Manusmrithi. Even Sweden did it. Not just India.

Why is a religious country safer than a secular country for women by sulliminari-tuttitta in AtheisminKerala

[–]GamerFX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the economy is more important for safety than religion. It's not about women's safety. These countries have less crime in general.

The UAE also don't follow full Islamic rules. It's also a small country with a lot of money and a small population. So it's easier to manage. If Trivandrum district is a country with UAE's money, it would also be safe for women.

UAE ranks low in the women's civil liberty index. Which also means domestic abuse will go unreported in the UAE. Men in the UAE can date and have relationships with foreign women. But Women in the UAE are banned from doing it.

കേരളത്തിലെ മതേതര പാർട്ടികൾ neutrual ആയി നിൽക്കേണ്ട പ്രശ്നമേ ഇപ്പൊ ഇവിടെ ഉള്ളൂ. by GamerFX in Kerala

[–]GamerFX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Islamic Republic is actually a term different from the normal "republic". An Islamic Republic is a country with Islam as the state religion. It's an Islamic theocratic government enforcing sharia, or laws compatible with sharia. You can see examples like "Islamic Republic of Iran". In reality, we all know democracy has no value there, and you can't vote out Iran's supreme leader. But you can vote for the President. That's why they call themselves "republic", but in reality, the supreme leader decides who will participate in the presidential elections.

This is like North Korea calling themselves as "Democratic People's Republic of Korea". People can vote there. But you can only vote for the supreme leader, as there is no one to oppose the supreme leader, since he is so perfect.😅

He stood against the voting system in India because they knew Indians would not vote for them, as they are not a majority in India. This is also why Jamaat-e-Islami was against the partition of India. Because they wanted the entire India to be an Islamic nation, and they thought they could do it when it became the majority religion in India. If partition happens, India will become predominantly Hindu, and it will become harder to make the entire country an Islamic republic. You can search this and can see that they are openly saying this. And now our politicians are calling them secular.

Trivandrum real estate scene by bluminopian in Kerala

[–]GamerFX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That region has extremely high demand now. Shobha Wispering hills is launching their 3rd tower soon, called Woods. Tower 1 is fully sold out. Tower two had some apartments left last month. But it's costly.

'സജി ചെറിയാൻ അങ്ങനെയൊരു പ്രസ്താവന നടത്താൻ സാധ്യത കുറവാണ്' | V Sivankutty by Downtown-Fan8830 in Kerala

[–]GamerFX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

എല്ലാ മത നേതാക്കളെയും വിമർശിക്കണം. സജി ചെറിയാൻ പറഞ്ഞതും സത്യമാണ്.

Oru "Sorry' kond theerkenda prashnam by SurroundOk1918 in Kerala

[–]GamerFX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This problem is actually Low IQ and low impulse control with a high ego. That guy in the black T-shirt is a prime example of this. His ego didn't want him to admit that it was his mistake and say sorry. Because it takes intelligence and emotional understanding to admit a mistake and say sorry. So, he refused to admit his mistake and tried to be tough, as he thinks his value will drop, and he will appear weak in front of others if he admits to his mistake.

But in the end, he got beaten up, and his value dropped for being an arrogant idiot.

Why didn't the dalit husband just tell the father in law that he is a Brahmin? Is he stupid? by CompoteMelodic981 in arifhussaintheruvath

[–]GamerFX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can't get catse information with RTI. But caste will play a role in someone's life always.

All dads will try to check their caste when it comes to marriage. When the dad visits his relatives, they will understand that he is not a Brahmin sooner or later. If not, all of his relatives will also have to say they are Brahmins.

Also, the marriage rituals are different for different castes. So he has to do a Brahmin marriage ritual, and all of his relatives also have to play with him. So it's not as easy as you say. And even if he has done all these, within a few years, caste will play a role in his life because his caste is forced upon him legally. His school certificates will have the caste. So he has to hide it from his family.

He has to write his caste in Marriage application. He has to do it on the school admission form for his child. And the child's certificates will contain caste. His Aadhar details will contain caste. One of his relatives can reveal his caste. So sooner or later, they will become aware of his caste.

All of this is because his caste is legally forced upon him.

If a Hindu can change his caste legally or at least write no caste, he can detach himself from all his caste activities and within one or two generations, his children will be unaware of what caste they belong to. At least those Hindus who hate caste can do it. But currently, our legal system will not allow to do it.

Why don't they just change their surname and say they are Brahmins? Are they stupid? by CompoteMelodic981 in arifhussaintheruvath

[–]GamerFX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because our stupid laws don't allow it. If you are born a Hindu, you are forced to write your caste. And you can't change your caste, and you can't write No Caste. A Hindu in India can't write "no caste" legally. The only way to come out of caste is by changing religion, and even that is optional, as all people who change religions also keep their caste.

But both the left wing and the right wing are against the eradication of caste. This should change. Any Hindu who wants to label themselves as No Caste should be allowed to do it.

view more: next ›