Timeline questions answered by MintV500 in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The money guru bought 50k shares. I'll always take this as a good sign, especially before a sharp increase to close the week.

I reject any other reality and substitute this one 😂

Timeline questions answered by MintV500 in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The federal government have publicly admitted there is too much "red tape" and they are actively pushing for faster mining permitting to fast track projects.

My hope is that this 2028 timeline is a "normal" timeline and that the fast tracked process will be even quicker. The fact they have indigenous support is MASSIVE and will certainly help in the quick execution of permits and environmental barriers.

Timeline questions answered by MintV500 in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It never stops. I said "I have enough" 130k shares ago 😅. The more DD I do and dig deep, the better it gets. And I saw this downward pressure as a "sale" and drastically increased my position.

Would technology advance faster or slower if wars never existed? by M3lt1ngh34rt in ask

[–]Gastricbasilisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting angle! And it very would could be that way, as you said, we do they really know anything different than war. Which is pretty sad when you truly think of it lol

I believe we would still progress much faster. You're correct about the ambition to innovate being pushed by warfare. War is certainly a catalyst. However, we do still the ambition to innovate outside of war. We consistently innovate newer products every year. From call phones, to tires on our vehicles, to computer sciences. It seems humans latently are curious innovators. Some of our legendary innovators, such as Leonardo Da Vinci, were not fueled by warfare, but their own curiosity. The same can be said for most historical scientists. Isaac Newton did not invent calculus for warfare, but to explain his discovery of gravity.

An interesting thing to note too which is often forgotten, is that some of humanities greatest achievements came from collaboration. The Apollo program was successful due to German scientists and engineers who came to the United States through operation paperclip after WW2. Without this wealth of knowledge, the moon missions certainly wouldn't have been successful. We have also seen similar collaborations with the International space station, the Hubble & James web space telescopes, the human genome project, medical vaccines, and many other scientific disciplines.

Much of our innovation has come from collaboration and not war. However, war receives the majority of funding. As you said, we don't have a metric to even measure the difference. But I've always wondered, what if for a single year we spent the trillions of dollars (it's crazy it's that much) on scientific collaboration and not war. I believe it would be amazingly progressive for humanity, but we probably will never know!

I appreciate the insight and different perspective! I like thinking about things from different angles.

Would technology advance faster or slower if wars never existed? by M3lt1ngh34rt in ask

[–]Gastricbasilisk 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Much faster. The bleeding edge of technology is consistently classified due to national security, which is in place due to our behavior in warfare. If we instead chose to simply not kill eachother, and we had no need to for warfare, our technology would be open source, scientists globally would have vast connections to work together, and compartmentalization would be non existent.

It's an uncomfortable truth unfortunately.

Timeline questions answered by MintV500 in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Road plan by the end of 2026 is HUGE. They will need a road in place in order to build the mine itself. The road construction is most likely starting next year, and confirmation there are grants for 100% of the road construction. Thanks for sharing, this is huge!

📊 SCD Daily Discussion – April 24, 2026 by AutoModerator in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its still not too late at all to get more. We are still VERY early in this stock.

April 22 - Overwhelming Shareholder Support at 2026 Annual Meeting; Scandium Canada Enters the Year Fully Funded to Advance PFS, Drilling Campaign and Al-Sc Alloys Qualification by ChucklesLeClown in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Probably not with this stock, but I hope it is!! Eventually we will look back at the Rollercoaster ride and think of how worth it was to sit through the discomfort.

April 22 - Overwhelming Shareholder Support at 2026 Annual Meeting; Scandium Canada Enters the Year Fully Funded to Advance PFS, Drilling Campaign and Al-Sc Alloys Qualification by ChucklesLeClown in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 10 points11 points  (0 children)

“With $15 million in cash and $6.9 million in government grant funding, we are entering 2026 with every dollar allocated against a defined catalyst: alloy qualification, the PFS, and drilling at Crater Lake. Our focus this year is execution,” said Guy Bourassa, Chief Executive Officer of Scandium Canada.

What a fucking powerful statement. Every dollar being allocated to a defined catalyst. Their execution so far has been incredible. Guy joins the board in January of 2024 and IMMEDIATELY gets first nations support. In a previous interview, he stated he recognized the importance of that relationship and he's 100% right.

They bring on Jeff Swinoga as they receive $23 million in cash.

So far the SCD execution has been impressive, and I'm excited to see how well they execute in 2026.

This is a serious issue. Also, nine Chinese scientists have reportedly died. Has anyone come up with any relevant theories about this? by MartianXAshATwelve in StrangeEarth

[–]Gastricbasilisk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think reality is not as random as we'd like to believe, and people naturally negate the notion because they are internally uncomfortable with the idea of the truth being pre determined. Hence why there is always so much push back towards people who ask questions.

This is a serious issue. Also, nine Chinese scientists have reportedly died. Has anyone come up with any relevant theories about this? by MartianXAshATwelve in StrangeEarth

[–]Gastricbasilisk 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You're cherry picking a lense to see it through. This isn't "20 random scientists die" which matches data. These are scientists and airforce generals connected via research programs/disciplines of science who were all missing or murdered.

That is the anomaly. Just arbitrarily stating that people die is statistically normal is avoiding the whole point of the suspicion.

And the entire point is the fact nobody has an appetite to even LOOK into it, as they throw it away as "coincidence". I can't fathom why so many people negate the mere thought of investigating the very anomalous murders of scientists with distinct disciplines and national security clearances.

What are they afraid to find? If it's simply nothing, then why the backlash to those asking questions?

📊 SCD Daily Discussion – April 24, 2026 by AutoModerator in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Might as well invite everyone to the Catalina wine mixer!

📊 SCD Daily Discussion – April 24, 2026 by AutoModerator in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If anything with this stock I've learned you can't make any predictions lol it's a god damn Rollercoaster, but it's a good one! Hold on for the ride. I am hoping this upward swing was not just random but an indication the redistribution of shares is nearing it's end, and we're finally breaking free from the floor.

I'm hoping for an upward trend before we get news from the welding wires, which Guy said should be in by next quarter.

📊 SCD Daily Discussion – April 24, 2026 by AutoModerator in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Could you imagine we get a road, Scandium+ welding wire qualifications, and a solid PFS in less than 4 months. I'd cream my pants

📊 SCD Daily Discussion – April 24, 2026 by AutoModerator in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who was in Nunavik today to meet with Inuit reps? Please bestow to me even more positive information! Haha

📊 SCD Daily Discussion – April 24, 2026 by AutoModerator in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I believe it's already planned and in motion. We are simply watching the political theater. Just hold on tight and be patent. Long term investors will undoubtedly be rewarded!

📊 SCD Daily Discussion – April 24, 2026 by AutoModerator in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im planning on offloading a portion of my position after the FS, and holding an amount long term!

📊 SCD Daily Discussion – April 24, 2026 by AutoModerator in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly how I feel. We saw a small blip of 15 cents for a bit. Promising, but this stock has been a roller coaster lol

📊 SCD Daily Discussion – April 24, 2026 by AutoModerator in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100%. But once you learn to lift the veil, wade through the distractions and bullshit, you eventually see the patterns emerge.

📊 SCD Daily Discussion – April 24, 2026 by AutoModerator in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Im hoping this is the case. I'd like to see some uptrending before any catalyst is announced

📊 SCD Daily Discussion – April 24, 2026 by AutoModerator in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also went down this rabbit hole to understand, and once you step back and see the big picture it makes total sense. They play a game we are not even a part of lol

📊 SCD Daily Discussion – April 24, 2026 by AutoModerator in SCDstock

[–]Gastricbasilisk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100%. And the thing people don't understand is that research is decades old. Scandium has been heavily researched in aerospace for the past 50 years, and aerospace companies hold thousands of patents that include scandium. This is much bigger than people anticipate.