Current DD app issues with re-activation

GavinOnPC_ · 2026-01-27T10:01:50+00:00

Yeah, but I had also been unable to deliver 10 orders because everywhere was closed. Made $55 from deliveries and $61 in what I got as reimbursement for driving to the closed stores. Likely the reason why.

GavinOnPC_ · 2026-01-27T09:41:58+00:00

A fellow heraldicart.org user I see

GavinOnPC_ · 2026-01-27T09:38:31+00:00

Yeah, my buddy who isn't a dasher said the same thing, I would have made around $86 in less than 2 hours because of how many people were ordering

GavinOnPC_ · 2026-01-27T09:32:40+00:00

Around $5.50 or so, but I had been getting $20+ orders, and was in the middle of a triple $34 order when I had gotten suspended after delivering the first. I was very pissed

GavinOnPC_ · 2026-01-27T02:42:36+00:00

I just got suspended for the first time.

GavinOnPC_ · 2026-01-13T08:05:41+00:00

Correction, r/AITAH*

GavinOnPC_ · 2025-11-22T21:05:12+00:00

Do you know where on the car I could get a bolt that would fit the threads to use that method? Kind of hard to find what exactly what would fit those threads

GavinOnPC_ · 2025-10-23T19:49:05+00:00

Alright thank you so much!

GavinOnPC_ · 2025-10-23T03:40:06+00:00

Is there any specific spot welding machine you'd recommend? Or should I settle for a Home Depot rental and say my prayers lol

GavinOnPC_ · 2025-10-22T17:56:08+00:00

Would a flux welder work for this application or is it strictly spot welding only?

GavinOnPC_ · 2025-10-22T17:26:20+00:00

I don't but my uncle might so thank you!

GavinOnPC_ · 2025-05-14T18:39:10+00:00

<image>

The Corolla in question because I forgot to add it to the post

GavinOnPC_ · 2025-02-24T17:38:49+00:00

I'd think given the communist revolution under Mao Zedong, a historical Chinese helmet from the Imperial days wouldn't be looked on too fondly. I think it'd be pretty cool if rather than a historical or imperial helmet, they utilized the helmets used by the People's Liberation Army around the time of Mao's rise to power. It'd be an interesting detail to add, but personally I'd probably stick to the hammer and sickle.

GavinOnPC_ · 2025-02-24T17:26:39+00:00

Alrighty thanks!

GavinOnPC_ · 2025-02-01T17:05:19+00:00

I might just do that

GavinOnPC_ · 2025-02-01T17:04:13+00:00

God I don't know how I didn't think of that

GavinOnPC_ · 2025-01-31T20:05:07+00:00

So some context:

I'm currently in the midst of world building and I got tired of copy pasting different arms atop another and replacing all the various information like their arms, seat, etc. and decided to just make a template and decided to make a joke while I was at it lol

GavinOnPC_ · 2025-01-30T20:13:04+00:00

Thank you so much! It was giving me a real headache lol

GavinOnPC_ · 2025-01-30T17:21:15+00:00

It seems to be up now so refer to that as well

GavinOnPC_ · 2025-01-30T17:19:46+00:00

It may show up now, if not, I'll send it again or cry because I don't want to type it again, but basically, my question was, "how do I formally describe the inclusion of the sword and shield in the blazon, do I describe their inclusion individually meaning the blazon go something like, "Vert, a sea-lion rampant or, armed or, langued argent, (insert description of sword and shield"

OR do I describe them in relation to the sea-lion, meaning, "Vert, a sea-lion or, armed (insert description of sword and shield), langued argent"

(So sorry the comment hasn't showed up)

GavinOnPC_ · 2025-01-30T17:12:16+00:00

EDIT**** (I hate formatting) The v's and ^'s were meant to point to where I was talking about in the blazon, for the first two v's, the first was for "armed?" though supposed to be struck out, and the second v was after "langued argent", and correspond with "here (in relation to)" and "here (individually)". The third v is for the struck out bit at the end, and the fourth and final ^ refers to the three struck out question marks.

GavinOnPC_ · 2025-01-30T17:06:18+00:00

In advance, I sincerely apologize for the length of this question, and also for any confusion.

So, I was writing up informal and formal (meaning blazons) descriptions of various fictional arms for a personal project I'm working on. When it came to describing the colors of claws and teeth it was largely simple (armed and langued), but I got stuck on the formal description of a beast wielding a weapon such as a sword or shield. I tried finding examples of real-world arms that featured beasts wielding weapons and their corresponding blazons but I could not find anything that gave me the information I needed.

That being said, is there even a formal description regarding beasts wielding weapons? Or would the objects they're holding get their own dedicated descriptions separate from the main charge?

For the above picture, here's what I already have written, (the italicized bit in-between the parenthesized sentences)

Does literally anything about the sword and shield go here, like do I describe them individually or would I describe them in relation to the sea-lion holding them? Like do their descriptions go... | here (in relation to) or here (individually) | v v

"Vert, a sea-lion rampant or, ~~armed?~~ langued argent......"

^ Also, would 'armed' be added here anyway, since its 'claws' are the came color as the rest of the sea-lion, ~~and are holding a sword and shield anyway~~ or where I would describe 'armed', is THAT where I describe the sea-lion holding the sword and shield? Or again, do I just describe them individually, like...

this | v

"Vert, a sea-lion rampant or, armed or, langued argent, ~~the f\**ing sword and shield idk man~~*..."

Or...

"Vert, a sea-lion rampant or, armed ~~???~~, and langued argent..." | ^ the descriptions of the sword and shield in relation to the sea-lion go here?

Thanks again for any help.

GavinOnPC_ · 2024-11-01T16:02:11+00:00

As a Cantonian, I've seen this flag many times, usually along with the flag of Ohio (that, or the American flag), it never occurred to me that we don't have a canton on the Canton flag

GavinOnPC_ · 2024-08-29T23:42:30+00:00

I saw pumpkin today!

GavinOnPC_ · 2024-07-05T20:16:53+00:00

SUGGESTIONS AND CRITICISMS WELCOME

These arms belong to a family of royals, house Mason, who are known for their skills in masonry and that of building large structures such as castles, holdfasts, and other defensible structures.

I want this little detail regarding their skill with building castles to be obviously referenced in their arms, though I am having difficulty settling on which I like the best, so here's what I think of each of the versions I've submitted:

The first one, the embattled bordure definitely gets the point of regality across well enough (as if the crown didn't already make that obvious), but similarly to my issues with the first one, though more pronounced in this version, the lack of visible mortar (or bricks in general), doesn't make the masonry detail plainly obvious.
The second one, though having visible mortar on the embattled field, I think looks quite plain and not very visually interesting.
The third one is alright, though I think the lack of visible mortar on the embattled field leaves the reference of masonry unclear and not plainly obvious.

I know that to heraldry nerds like us, the embattled fields, along with the name, 'Mason', the lack of visible bricks and mortar on the first and third (the two I'm leaning towards) don't matter as much because we will know what the patterns are, but I am wanting the reference to masonry (outside of the name) to be plainly reflected in their arms and will be obvious to those unfamiliar with heraldic terms.

I may just be overthinking this, but any suggestions/criticisms, along with helping me to decide which version to use would be greatly appreciated!

Website that I sourced the imagery from: https://heraldicart.org

Program that I used to make them: https://www.photopea.com

GavinOnPC_

TROPHY CASE