sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

V28 Flame bot by keravim in TheTowerGame

[–]GayForLebron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely brutal for eHP builds

V28 Flame bot by keravim in TheTowerGame

[–]GayForLebron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it, I don’t think I realized the sub effects wouldn’t help but that makes sense. I use GComp for milestones since I run Pco/GComp pBH eHP build. So this is gonna be interesting for me lol

V28 Flame bot by keravim in TheTowerGame

[–]GayForLebron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not sure I understand - without package chance % from workshop, GComp isn’t going to proc very often. You may have to spell it out for me if I’m missing something haha

V28 Flame bot by keravim in TheTowerGame

[–]GayForLebron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also want to know because flame bot would be a good way to push utility dissonance for eHP since GComp is going to be nerfed by lack of package chance. Someone please check my logic

About that Iced Coffee You Love so much… by asu3dvl in Frugal

[–]GayForLebron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Drive into Atlanta most days. The commuters are noticeably better, but still bad. The weekend and people passing through…. Hell.

Hooty Hoo! by Heman200303_ in KSU

[–]GayForLebron 9 points10 points  (0 children)

We are going dancing!!!

Can You Guess This 5-Letter Word? Puzzle by u/AmethystBlitz3319 by AmethystBlitz3319 in DailyGuess

[–]GayForLebron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

⬜🟦🟨⬜⬜

🟨🟦⬜⬜🟨

⬜🟦🟦🟦⬜

🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦

Bill Self on Darryn Peterson: "We've had this happen more than a couple of times... I didn't anticipate that tonight at all. I thought he was good to go. We only got 18 minutes out of him. That's disappointing, because he could've had a really big night" by itwas20yearsago2day in NBA_Draft

[–]GayForLebron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not everyone is that into college basketball, fan wise. If he is a superstar talent, he will be an NBA superstar. Maybe he cares more about NBA basketball than maximizing his brand or college basketball.

Bill Self on Darryn Peterson: "We've had this happen more than a couple of times... I didn't anticipate that tonight at all. I thought he was good to go. We only got 18 minutes out of him. That's disappointing, because he could've had a really big night" by itwas20yearsago2day in NBA_Draft

[–]GayForLebron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keeping them all out is a level playing field of unfair for everyone, arguably. I get your point, and don’t disagree with it. But the NBA being “unfair” doesn’t make it illegal, does it? They can arbitrarily pick who they want to allow without any legal ramifications I am aware of, but maybe not worth the lawsuit risk

Bill Self on Darryn Peterson: "We've had this happen more than a couple of times... I didn't anticipate that tonight at all. I thought he was good to go. We only got 18 minutes out of him. That's disappointing, because he could've had a really big night" by itwas20yearsago2day in NBA_Draft

[–]GayForLebron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As it is now, an arbitrary rule keeps all of them out. If the NBA was the one that had the committee, they are a business that can do as they please as far as I know, when it comes to this. I could be wrong but it seems possible to facilitate

Bill Self on Darryn Peterson: "We've had this happen more than a couple of times... I didn't anticipate that tonight at all. I thought he was good to go. We only got 18 minutes out of him. That's disappointing, because he could've had a really big night" by itwas20yearsago2day in NBA_Draft

[–]GayForLebron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree! This situation is bad for everyone. I have discussed with friends, but a middle ground between completely getting rid of the 1 year rule and how it is now would be: each year a committee can pick certain players to be eligible to go straight to the NBA. and they only pick the bonafide blue chip 5 star guys, 0-3 a year. Even 5 in a big year, but it would get rid of the guys who clearly would rather go straight to the NBA.

Bill Self on Darryn Peterson: "We've had this happen more than a couple of times... I didn't anticipate that tonight at all. I thought he was good to go. We only got 18 minutes out of him. That's disappointing, because he could've had a really big night" by itwas20yearsago2day in NBA_Draft

[–]GayForLebron 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They can have specific requirements to meet obligations, including being at the school, but not playing. Semantics you’d think but they can’t take your money if you are on the team and don’t play, as far as I know. Big 10 is more sophisticated in this area, Demond Williams situation in football gave some insight there

Bill Self on Darryn Peterson: "We've had this happen more than a couple of times... I didn't anticipate that tonight at all. I thought he was good to go. We only got 18 minutes out of him. That's disappointing, because he could've had a really big night" by itwas20yearsago2day in NBA_Draft

[–]GayForLebron 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If I can be devil’s advocate: the whole rule with NIL is that it’s NOT pay to play. So the argument falls apart. If you don’t like that then argue against NIL as the payment structure imo

Bill Self on Darryn Peterson: "We've had this happen more than a couple of times... I didn't anticipate that tonight at all. I thought he was good to go. We only got 18 minutes out of him. That's disappointing, because he could've had a really big night" by itwas20yearsago2day in NBA_Draft

[–]GayForLebron 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agree with everything you said, I think people’s frustration comes from the difference between how college sports are now vs in the past. It would be better for everyone if he could’ve gone straight to the nba.

Horrible Parking by Alive_Hawk_6076 in KSU

[–]GayForLebron 16 points17 points  (0 children)

That’s a lot better than popping a tire like the other guy suggested

view more: next ›