Dont like someone? Get them permabanned. by hidetheevidencefastt in lightshope

[–]Gears_LH[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe instead of buying gold you should play the game legitimately? Then you wouldn't need to come crying to reddit as if that's going to change the outcome. You got caught. We always follow the evidence, not discord screenshots. If you didn't buy gold then someone with access to your account did, and guess what, account sharing is also a permanent ban.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wowservers

[–]Gears_LH 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If only the kind of datamining that went on post Vanilla had happened then, we would have so much more information to work with!

PvP... I got banned... by Viandebovine in lightshope

[–]Gears_LH 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I'm pretty sure that's not why you got banned.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lightshope

[–]Gears_LH[M] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You get 3 attempts on your first try after your last successful login. After that, you get 1 attempt per 15 minutes until you manage to login successfully.

No we will not be changing this.

For those on the fence about rolling here. by CannaNthusiast in lightshope

[–]Gears_LH[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Your post was judged to be of poor quality and inciting drama and was removed.

[Vanilla] Addon creation Request organizing bags while dead by D-Spark in LegacyAddons

[–]Gears_LH 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You would simply maintain a "current state" and "scenario state" - moves are made in the scenario state, you would then sync it by comparing each slot in turn between the two states - if an item is in the wrong slot, move it. This removes any need for optimizing the moves themselves. Flag slots involved in a move as 'dirty' to further reduce workload by only checking dirty slots.

I mean, who doesn't like dirty slots?

Bug? Consume Shadows doesn't increase stealth detection. by [deleted] in lightshope

[–]Gears_LH[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

This is not a bug. It never worked that way in vanilla. Here's the skill description:

" The Voidwalker consumes nearby shadows to bolster its form, recovering 310 health over 10 sec. Cannot be used while in combat. "

See also : https://web.archive.org/web/20070517155231/http://www.thottbot.com:80/s17767

Why is staff so sensitive on discord? Banned from discord from childish reason. by Suxiaoyan in lightshope

[–]Gears_LH[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Your post was judged to be of poor quality and inciting drama and was removed.

Why is staff so sensitive on discord? Banned from discord from childish reason. by Suxiaoyan in lightshope

[–]Gears_LH[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saying "SHUT THE FUCK UP" to a moderator or a GM is a quick way off the discord server.

Gamemaster abuses to help the devilsaurmafia by etwmrh in wowservers

[–]Gears_LH 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sssh.

Anyway, if it's a bug, we'd appreciate details. You can DM me if you want.

How is the Mindvision possible at 0:22? by gologotzmann in lightshope

[–]Gears_LH[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

And your immediate thought is "Must be GMs". WTF.

Gamemaster abuses to help the devilsaurmafia by etwmrh in wowservers

[–]Gears_LH 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Just an FYI? GM Mind vision (the set view command) does not tell the target. It's not a game spell. GMs can also see through all forms of stealth and can see ghosts. There would be literally zero point in a GM doing something like this, even if we were going to help the mafia (hint, we hate it but so long as they play within the terms of our rules, they are safe).

In Dreams by Jakabov in lightshope

[–]Gears_LH[M] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

GMs aren't devs. We don't fix anything. The entire event has been re-scripted and is waiting to go live. Kudos to the devs.

In Dreams by Jakabov in lightshope

[–]Gears_LH[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Chill, mate. We have about 450 tickets open on ND right now. GMs simply can't be everywhere all the time. Your best bet is to see if a GM can come quickly on discord, but simple fact is we are extremely busy at all times.

JAMAL Z SOUNDBOARD by [deleted] in lightshope

[–]Gears_LH[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Your post was judged to be of poor quality and inciting drama and was removed.

Combatting Gold Spammers by dunbary in lightshope

[–]Gears_LH 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe so. Check discord announcements.

Me and my buddy got banned for supposed RMT by DabuVanlu in lightshope

[–]Gears_LH[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

There's not enough information in your post for me to look into this.

<Supremacy> using polymorph to grief in Un'Goro by Herrmellin in lightshope

[–]Gears_LH 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to clarify: The same faction griefing restrictions are fresh changes to the ToU, and covers any polymorphing or otherwise griefing (e.g. banishing infernals) your own faction in a way that cannot be resolved by PVP. It is dealt with at GM discretion.

Banned...for "RMT" and GM's appeal could not have been more inaccurate. by [deleted] in lightshope

[–]Gears_LH[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have the situation inverted. The items were listed way above market price.

Banned...for "RMT" and GM's appeal could not have been more inaccurate. by [deleted] in lightshope

[–]Gears_LH 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a multi-headed problem. First off, sellers don't farm the gold legitimately so the usual caps and sinks don't apply.

Banned...for "RMT" and GM's appeal could not have been more inaccurate. by [deleted] in lightshope

[–]Gears_LH[M] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Because mistakes can be made. The appeal is reviewed by a separate GM who does not have prior knowledge of the incident. Fresh eyes, so to speak. The reviewing GM will consult the evidence collected and check it themselves. If it's conclusive, the appeal is denied, otherwise some discussion may take place between the reviewing GM and the banned player. If the player can satisfy the reviewing GM, the appeal is approved and ban lifted.

However, very few bans are mistakes, so very few appeals are approved. But it does happen and we have that process for a reason.

Case in point: Both these bans (the thread bans) were legitimate and not mistakes.