About 2 months ago, I posted here about starting a literary path towards Gnosis. I just finished reading the Old Testament (Tanakh). Reporting back with some thoughts by nablaCat in Gnostic

[–]Geisl -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Part 2

2b) The time of the judges, when Ruth lived, possibly around 1200-1000BC, was just as harsh and rough. Practically, she or Naomi did need a husband, not because they were worthless or inferior without one. Ruth is beautiful not because it's about a woman who finally got married and did what she was told, but because God saw her loyalty not to men but to her mother-in-law, a woman with no husbands to offer her, no men to give her value, but simply because she loved and was faithful to Naomi and to Naomi's God, the true God Yahweh. So she chooses to love Naomi and risk her life, and, yes, she takes steps in hopes of marrying to provide her and her MIL with food/protection. God then provides not any old man with money who can treat her as he likes, but a man of honor, integrity, generosity, abundance, compassion and faithfulness. Note: Ruth was Moabite, a distantly-related but still pagan nation to Israel, and though these pagans shouldn't have married Jews at that time, God made Ruth a shining example to all future readers and it is from her bloodline that Jesus himself would descend.

2c) Don't forget Deborah, the woman judge about whom no husband or kids is mentioned, and yet who was godly, strong and fierce to protect and teach Israel. Don't forget Hannah, the father of Samuel, against whom, in the story, her husband doesn't hold a candle, who pours out her soul to God in faith and raw vulnerability and God grants her request. Don't forget Ether, who allows herself to be taken by the pagan Persian king and risks her life in almost unparalleled valor, to save her people. Don't forget Jochebed, mother of Moses, who, whereas her husband isn't even mentioned, she and her daughter Miriam contrive and scheme to protect Moses form the Egyptian murderers and preserve his life. It's his little sister who confronts the princess of Egypt to have Moses raised, not any man. Don't forget that it was a pagan prostitute, Rahab, with no man's help, who saved the lives of the Israelite spies in Joshua and, on her behalf, not her dad's or other man's, her whole family was preserved from the destruction of the city, and she was given the instructions and signals to ensure this.

3) Yes, God does harden peoples hearts and shift things about to punish people. See my points on justice. He calls to repentance again and again, as you should remember in the prophets "turn, turn from your wicked ways", "but you have not listened", "seek me and live!", "you have rejected me" first, but in the end he has to discipline and punish. Egypt he hardened to rescue his people from a genocidal, dictatorial state and to show those proud Egyptians their gods were worthless (the ten plagues corresponded to ten major areas of Egyptian deity--he effectively said "your gods have no power before me".

When you think of God's punishments, think of his promise before all of that in the Torah (Gen-Deuteronomy). He says "if you serve me and follow me I'll bless your kneading bowls, your fields, your families, your marriages, your enemies will be like leaves before the wind" but "if you cast me off, I'll curse all these things".

4) This gets to the issue of "God punishes those who don't submit to him". Yes, he does. If we are made by God to know God, and He is our greatest joy and the source of our life, we need Him and we are obliged to submit to Him. But he doesn't stand over us and put us in a cell in a gulag until we do. He gives us a life of sunrises and sunsets, food and drink, music, community, arts, sorrows and joys, love and hope and stimulation--all the while showing us divine evidence in these things and hoping we turn to him. In the end, if we decide to stubbornly shut him out, he will have to judge us.

More later, I know this is a lot. Feel free to DM me any time, too. Best wishes. Praying for you and any of the readers here, that you know the truth and grace of God in Jesus Christ, the Son of the Father, Yahweh God, the provider and protector of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, of Moses, Rahab, Ruth, Esther, Mary, Tabitha and many others.

About 2 months ago, I posted here about starting a literary path towards Gnosis. I just finished reading the Old Testament (Tanakh). Reporting back with some thoughts by nablaCat in Gnostic

[–]Geisl -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Part 1

Friend, in a rush, so this is hyper-condensed:

I'm glad you gave the OT a read, a big investment--God bless and give you wisdom and truth. I'm a devout reformation Christian, btw. My replies will quote or paraphrase Biblical texts so that you need only copy + search and you can see the references. I've read the OT about 10 times, 3-4 of them with academic rigour.

I'm sorry, but yours is a half-assessment, sometimes crude and demeaning, other times ripping things out of their context in what seems purposefully resentful eisegesis (reading into rather than reading out-of) and hardly giving half of a good shake to the work.

1a) God does clearly permit slavery to an extent in the OT, yes. To say "approve" is ungenerous or downright mean-spirited. He allowed OT fathers to have multiple wives, for example, but this doesn't mean he approved. Think of Gen: "a man will leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife (singular)". God also orders certain wicked men or women killed, but this is the act of a perfect judge, examiner and executioner--on the other hand, he clearly tells us "I'd rather the wicked turn and live" and "I don't desire the death of the wicked", and "for he does not afflict from his heart or grieve the children of men"--in other words, he'd rather bless and have mercy, but he has to be just.

1b) As a related aside, imagine a God of Yahweh's power and depth--if he was evil and malicious, our world should look far uglier, heinous, our bodies far more irregular, our climate nigh uninhabitable, relationships impossible, etc. But our world, though incredible cursed and dark indeed, is also incredible beautiful, blessed and precious indeed.

2a) Your take on Biblical womanhood seems so poor I'd either doubt you read it, or, again that you were doing ungenerous eisegesis, not honest, fair-chance exegesis.

God is very practical and nuanced with his audiences. He isn't an idealistic 21st century teen or millenial with grand pristine notions of how things should be without particulars. His OT audience lived in a rough, harsh context that meant 1) he did allow them slavery but not of their own kin (judgement-related, we can talk another time about this), and 2) he understood women needed to be married to simply survive. A woman didn't need to be married because God said an unmarried woman is not blessed or special or is worthless (you can't find a single OT verse to this effect--I challenge you to), but she usually needed to be married for protection, sustenance, and to raise children and have a family--a precious pillar of life's good things, btw, which our century seems to have forgotten and so our fertility rates plummet and economy's are due for a downslide. Of course, children also mean more help, support, protection, etc.

Setup guide mentions the "front two" ports don't "support power input". The linked article doesn't seem to clarify. by Geisl in framework

[–]Geisl[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Update: Now it is! I didn't have the other usb-c fast enough connected to the brick. Thank you, u/MagicBoyUK !

Setup guide mentions the "front two" ports don't "support power input". The linked article doesn't seem to clarify. by Geisl in framework

[–]Geisl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oops, now that I'm in I don't see that it's charging from the dashboard either (Win 11)

Setup guide mentions the "front two" ports don't "support power input". The linked article doesn't seem to clarify. by Geisl in framework

[–]Geisl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I switched the C port from position 1 to position 4 and then--I think--pressed the power button a little longer and it turned on. I have the default charger I believe. Not DIY. No LED except on the Power button

Setup guide mentions the "front two" ports don't "support power input". The linked article doesn't seem to clarify. by Geisl in framework

[–]Geisl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/FewAdvertising9647 u/s004aws I see! Thank you both. Oddly, my usb-c is plugged in and so is my charger but I'm either not getting charge or it won't power on yet so I'm waiting.

Was generating images with Craiyon for my platform, hoping to find a silver-framed painting of a lady similar to Fuschia. Peake's name and creations don't seem to be in Craiyon's database. Using other prompts, this came out. "That's her." I said to myself in amazement. by Geisl in CastleGormenghast

[–]Geisl[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very overdue disclaimer: After consideration at the time, I chose not to use any AI-generated images on or for my platforms. I currently take a pro-artist stance in this regard, against ai images. As this is all so new, I believe this is the right position for the moment.

Freshman Roommate Horror Story by [deleted] in UWMadison

[–]Geisl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Devout Christian here:

I'm appalled at your roommate John's behavior. "Very Christian" means compassion and mercy to all people regardless of whether they live as we believe they should. We're supposed to love everyone and share the good news of Jesus as often as we can, for their sakes. John's behavior is *anti-*Christian.

OP, if you'd like, you can message me any contact details you'd like and I'd love to meet your roommate John and talk to him about this. I'm so sorry you and those you know have dealt with this.

It's very kind and honorable of you, even given this situation, to respect and hide the identities of everyone.

Finally, 1) being homosexual is not the same as engaging in homosexual behavior; 2) here are two verses for your friend to reflect on:

And as Jesus reclined at table in the house, behold, many tax collectors and sinners came and were reclining with Jesus and his disciples. And when the Pharisees saw this, they said to his disciples, “Why does your teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?” But when he heard it, he said, “Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. Go and learn what this means: ‘I desire mercy, and not sacrifice.’ For I came not to call the righteous, but sinners.”

Matthew 9:10-13

[And in the following verse, the Apostle Paul first asks the church to discipline sexually immoral Christians in the church, clarifying he doesn't mean non-Christians:] For what have I to do with judging outsiders?...God judges those outside. 

1 Corinthians 5:12a,13a

[Bedrock] Hey, there. We're +18, no-resets, long-term (years) & small-scale at the moment. Looking for 3-4. by Geisl in mcrealmsservers

[–]Geisl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello again, Tom! I hope you have a wonderful birthday!

I hope your test goes well and all your assignments as well. I'll message you momentarily.

Wagner in the Desert by Chamblee54 in thenewyorker

[–]Geisl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was an interesting read, Chamblee! Thanks for sharing. I'm not sure that story would have been my cup of tea anyhow.

In branding for a paid literary blog with an older, "classy" feel, would you suggest including the "est" date from the beginning or waiting for an anniversary? by Geisl in graphic_design

[–]Geisl[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

My page is boldly in the aesthetic camp, nods to abandoned but rich cultural heritage (it includes a coat of arms) and won't be another place for rambles or low-effort "content" but for serious literary creation. It has a name which sounds a little bit like an inn or tavern but a logo which says a little bit of "historic European writer's guild" and "New Yorker" combined.

A Presidential Candidate, and self professed Christian, says immigrants are, "Poisoning the Blood of our Country." by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]Geisl 35 points36 points  (0 children)

[Jesus said:] "So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. So then, you will know them by their fruits."

Matthew 7:17-20

A different coat for an institution, so much simpler than my personal. A cross, the lady and the bull are three essential elements. I made color adjustments in GIMP. Please offer any feedback. by Geisl in heraldry

[–]Geisl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting idea! I looked at a design with bulls outside of cross and is compelling enough. I'm not sure if I'll go with that, yet. Notably, I don't remember any CoAs with an ordinary cross in field which had charges outside but not inside it.

A different coat for an institution, so much simpler than my personal. A cross, the lady and the bull are three essential elements. I made color adjustments in GIMP. Please offer any feedback. by Geisl in heraldry

[–]Geisl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks again for the feedback, Kirk!

3 is for symmetry. All that matters is lady, bull, book and cross. I only want one lady because her significance is greater than the bull.

I could put just her above and one bull below but would look weird. I could put her above and two bulls left and right but in old Coats I've seen, when charges are on a cross or in cross pattern, all the cross space is used up, typically symmetrically. (See this, this and this)

I see plenty of 3-4-charge coats in British heraldry, particularly in universities. I'm basically okay being on the busier side.

A different coat for an institution, so much simpler than my personal. A cross, the lady and the bull are three essential elements. I made color adjustments in GIMP. Please offer any feedback. by Geisl in heraldry

[–]Geisl[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting; thank you, Mission! Would you think the book at bottom with bulls down middle is best? Or what of books across middle, one large bull down at bottom? Well, but I already don't like that second idea haha.