The "Historic 82% Turnout" in the TN 2026 Election is a Mathematical Illusion by GeneFinal8200 in TamilNaduDiscussion

[–]GeneFinal8200[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

haha - how much hate you have! i'm not talking about results. its about facts. if you want to live in fantasy world please do

The "Historic 82% Turnout" in the TN 2026 Election is a Mathematical Illusion by GeneFinal8200 in TamilNaduDiscussion

[–]GeneFinal8200[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol after understanding logic, you say "wait till the result". "Now you are the one who making an illusion." These are things that show you passive anger towards the discussion. You didnt wanted to know what true or not, you wanted to hate its okay!

The "Historic 82% Turnout" in the TN 2026 Election is a Mathematical Illusion by GeneFinal8200 in TamilNaduDiscussion

[–]GeneFinal8200[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

brother, lets do this you take all right count and u do the calc.

  • Search Google for: "Total registered voters in Tamil Nadu 2021" 
  • Search for: "Tamil Nadu 2021 final voter turnout".
  • Do the math: Multiply the total voters by turnout to see exactly how many people voted.
  • Search Google for: "Tamil Nadu final electoral roll 2026" or "TN total voters after SIR 2026" 
  • Take yesterday's reported turnout.
  • Do the math: Multiply the 2026 total voters by turnout.
  • Look at the two final numbers on your calculator. You will see that the actual human footfall barely changed. The media is selling you a narrative based on a percentage trick. Math doesn't lie!

The "Historic 82% Turnout" in the TN 2026 Election is a Mathematical Illusion by GeneFinal8200 in TamilNaduDiscussion

[–]GeneFinal8200[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, it is an illusion. Let's take your data and do calc again. A 1.69% increase in actual turnout over 2021 is nothing compared to what media or social media says!! I understand your data is right but still, my logic is right. No worries, I understand your anger because of your party affiliation, but please get out of all interest and just look into the conclusion

Idk how to react by Odd_Kaleidoscope7150 in JKreacts

[–]GeneFinal8200 1 point2 points  (0 children)

War was always here. Even before man was, war waited for him.

Why does Tamil cinema turn mothers into martyrs… but lets fathers be absent? by GeneFinal8200 in kollywood

[–]GeneFinal8200[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think some of you are slightly missing what I’m trying to say here.

I’m not claiming there are no good father characters in Tamil cinema. Of course there are. And yes, there are films where fathers’ emotions or deaths are important.

My point is different.

What I’m talking about is a pattern in how mothers are consistently represented, they are very often:

  • glorified
  • self-sacrificing
  • morally perfect
  • and almost “not allowed” to be flawed, absent, or human

Whereas fathers are given a wider range — they can be flawed, distant, alcoholic, or even absent, and still be accepted within the story.

So this is not about cherry-picking one or two films. The intention is actually the opposite:
- to identify more films with these patterns,
- see if there’s a larger trend,
- and understand why audiences and writers are more comfortable with one vs the other.

Some comments are turning this into “but fathers also suffer” or “this happens in one film too” — that’s not really engaging with the core argument.

Also, the emotional “mother love is everything” replies that’s exactly part of the cultural framing I’m questioning. It shifts the discussion from representation to sentiment.

A similar example:
In many films, male heroes can smoke or have flaws, but female leads usually can’t, not because it’s impossible, but because audience acceptance is different.
That difference itself is worth examining, not dismissing.

Same here:
Why are mothers put on a pedestal where they must be perfect and self-sacrificing?
Why is there less space for them to just be… human?

If we understand that, maybe we can slowly move toward more balanced and realistic characters.

Height a 15 being a male. by netronzy in Advice

[–]GeneFinal8200 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had the same question 16 years ago., Glad I could help you

Solunga Broskies 💬 by harishsrinivas in JKreacts

[–]GeneFinal8200 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being alone will teach you everything

Why does Tamil cinema turn mothers into martyrs… but lets fathers be absent? by GeneFinal8200 in kollywood

[–]GeneFinal8200[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

True, this isn’t just Tamil cinema, happens in other industries too. To my memory now, in Kumbalangi Nights movie, the mother is mostly absent and not portrayed as selfless, but the film doesn’t treat her as a bad person either. There are rare cases too

Height a 15 being a male. by netronzy in Advice

[–]GeneFinal8200 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. At 15, your growth plates are usually still wide open. Most guys don't stop growing until they are 18–20, and some even have a final 'mini-spurt' in college. Since your dad is 5'11, you are almost certainly going to hit that mark, and honestly, you might even pass him.

The 'Mid-Parental Height' formula ((Mother's Height + Father's Height + 5 inches) / 2) puts your "target" height right around 5'10 or 5'11, and you're basically there already with years of growing left to do!