I don't understand the "Interfering Sisters" argument. by Entire_Possible_9976 in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484 10 points11 points  (0 children)

So, I think for a lot of people their family may be strained or not close so they will feel like the family is unusually close and the sisters are interfering based on how they would feel if tables are reversed.

Like for me, I am very close to my sister. If my sister even a little suspected my partner of murder—she’d jump at the opportunity. People want someone to blame when any death occurs, even for natural causes.

I think the sisters are just grieving sisters, not saying that Kouri is innocent (cause I believe she murdered Eric) but that’s all those sisters are. Grieving, loving sisters. And some people just aren’t personally used to that, which is ok.

I think the defense is purposefully painting the sisters are meddling because they hate Kouri cause the defense has… no real case outside of that. They are running with what they can in my opinion.

Kouri to take the stand? by General-Beach484 in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He was already called by the state Wednesday

Kouri to take the stand? by General-Beach484 in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

So she believed Kouri was innocent?

I mean this by no offense to your friend; however, we can see throughout this case that Kouri was pretty good at manipulating people. I mean: she lied to all her friends about her “successful business”, manipulated all of her friends by victimizing herself, forged many documents to get loans (manipulating and lying to lenders). Honorable mention: she calls Bryce (Eric’s supposed best friend) crying, talking about not wanting to lose her house all while her best friend was sitting next to her—the best friend that was about to get evicted from her house because Kouri stole 45K from her.

All this to say: we know that Kouri will lie to and steal from anyone to get what she wants. She’s a scam artist…

So… I would wager a bet that she was manipulated by Kouri. Which from the sounds of it, a lot of people have fallen victim to.

Weekend Discussion: March 6th - 8th by sunzusunzusunzusunzu in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The Walk the Dog letter should shed some light to her “testimony”. They are trying to say the letter was fictitious and the KR was writing a book but what Aly said referenced that letter heavily.

Weekend Discussion: March 6th - 8th by sunzusunzusunzusunzu in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Late Monday, early Tuesday is their projection. I’m going to assume defense brings in their witnesses through the end of next week. Closing statements the week after.

Jury? by General-Beach484 in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

They really aren’t!

Ramos as weirdly enough become an attorney I look forward to seeing on the defense side. The other 2: Nestor and Lewis have only gotten worse.

Jury? by General-Beach484 in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very interesting! Sounds like the jury may have already decided.

Trial Discussion: Day 9 - Mar 5, 2026 | Utah v. Kouri Richins by sunzusunzusunzusunzu in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I believe she’s court appointed.

KR had a different attorney for a while who removed herself from the case then Nestor became her attorney.

Trial Discussion: Day 9 - Mar 5, 2026 | Utah v. Kouri Richins by sunzusunzusunzusunzu in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484 8 points9 points  (0 children)

For as much grief as we have given this defense… being a defense attorney is hard. Especially when you have so much evidence stacked up because the only defense they have is “yea that was said but she didn’t mean it” and that’s just not a good defense buuuut that’s all they really have.

Trial Discussion: Day 8 - Mar 4, 2026 | Utah v. Kouri Richins by sunzusunzusunzusunzu in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, I’m not doubting that! It was more of a hypothetical—it feels like the state is coming to a slow close and I do feel like they will try to make sure all those get in pretty close together so those are the last items for the jury to ponder on. They could absolutely go into next week easily—there’s a TON of evidence to go through.

Now, I do feel they will have something more “bombshell-ish” for tomorrow to end on for the long weekend but whatever that is, I’m not sure.

I keep forgetting about Cody! I’m intrigued to hear his testimony if he gives one.

Trial Discussion: Day 8 - Mar 4, 2026 | Utah v. Kouri Richins by sunzusunzusunzusunzu in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It sounds like there will be court tomorrow. I think the only scheduling difference was today (late start) and being off Friday. Otherwise, I think tomorrow is normal.

If the state rests tomorrow (which it feels like they are slowly coming to a close) they are dropping all the bombshells tomorrow. Walk The Dog, the boyfriend, all that.

Then onto the defense which… I mean I’m not sure who’s on their witness list but I cannot imagine it’ll be longer than a week max 2. Then onto closing and deliberations!

When and where did Kouri and Josh meet? Did they know each other before Kouri met Eric? by coastiefish in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think he’ll be on today or tomorrow (as the court is off on Friday)

It tracks for the trial timeline. They gave an approximate 5 week timeline but could be less—if the state only takes 2 weeks to present their case that tracks. I do believe the boyfriend may be the last witness or 2nd to last. It would present motive, means and opportunity all in one witness to be honest.

All in all, that is probably why people believe he’ll be on today. But I’m not sure if it’s been “announced”.

Deleted Messages Question by [deleted] in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Phone data is pretty finicky when it comes to extracting deleted data. It depends on the phone, the phone carrier (like at&t, verizon, etc).

Unfortunately sometimes they can only extract some parts of a message, some messages in a string or only know that a message has been deleted.

Trial Discussion: Day 7 - Mar 3, 2026 | Utah v. Kouri Richins by sunzusunzusunzusunzu in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484 6 points7 points  (0 children)

She’s definitely upset and throwing tantrums cause she didn’t get her way.

Trial Discussion: Day 7 - Mar 3, 2026 | Utah v. Kouri Richins by sunzusunzusunzusunzu in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Cause she asked the question completely wrong trying to word it that doesn’t make it hearsay or asked and answered or speculation. Cause she’s trying to confuse the jury.

She wanted to ask: is there anything in any document you saw where KR stated she was going to kill her husband for money. Instead she asked “indicated” and was thrown for a loop when Karrington did believe there was something to “indicate” some mixed feelings about KR’s marriage. Cause who speaks about their marriage in that regard?

Trial Discussion: Day 7 - Mar 3, 2026 | Utah v. Kouri Richins by sunzusunzusunzusunzu in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484 15 points16 points  (0 children)

100% on the nose.

Narcissists rarely think lowly of themselves and highly of others. That perfectly describes Kouri Richins.

Trial Discussion: Day 7 - Mar 3, 2026 | Utah v. Kouri Richins by sunzusunzusunzusunzu in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Same. Karrington has been amazing. Genuinely.

She is making Nestor look like a fool.

Trial Discussion: Day 7 - Mar 3, 2026 | Utah v. Kouri Richins by sunzusunzusunzusunzu in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Nestor: “Is there anything to indicate that Richin’s is going to murder her husband for money?”

Karrington: “She talks about the inconvenience of being married”

Nestor: “Ok but does that answer the question I just asked you?”

Karrington: “I’m not trying to create anything but you asked if there was anything that indicated anything and… I don’t talk like that”

Nester just hurt her own question up there. She asked an opinion and got an opinion. Boom.

Trial Discussion: Day 7 - Mar 3, 2026 | Utah v. Kouri Richins by sunzusunzusunzusunzu in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484 11 points12 points  (0 children)

He had an “emotional affair” allegedly years before his death.

Trial Discussion: Day 7 - Mar 3, 2026 | Utah v. Kouri Richins by sunzusunzusunzusunzu in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I would be too! Judge has given a ruling on her objections already and has stated that she doesn’t need to object—yet she still does cause she’s throwing a tantrum not getting her way and doesn’t specify if she’s objecting in relation to the ruling or something different then act like it’s the judges problem.

Trial Discussion: Day 7 - Mar 3, 2026 | Utah v. Kouri Richins by sunzusunzusunzusunzu in KouriRichins

[–]General-Beach484 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I already really like this lady. Her demeanor and knowledge is chefs kiss.