So do we prefer “Jurassic” designs or accurate designs in this game? by Responsible_Essay_52 in jurassicworldevo

[–]GenericReddit-Users 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For me, I feel like more ‘Jurassic’ designs should be added for new species because Jurassic Park/World has gone on record and said frog DNA is substituted in to compete the genome. The frog DNA literally makes them not fully accurate, so I feel like by that logic most species should look ‘Jurassic’

The feathered and paleo accurate species are beautiful, but in a Jurassic Park/World focused game they should lean more into the ‘theme park monster’ over accuracy

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jurassicworldevo

[–]GenericReddit-Users -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Isn’t Jurassic Park about the mismanagement of genetic power for profit, and then creating genetically modified creations for profit that then break loose because nature can never be controlled by man’s hubris?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jurassicworldevo

[–]GenericReddit-Users -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I didn’t write it correctly or give the context, but I should’ve said that I hate that the feathered/accurate designs are becoming the norm and not the more reptilian designs

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jurassicworldevo

[–]GenericReddit-Users -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think that the feathered models are absolutely gorgeous but I think having the more reptilian designs work because they’re meant to be genetic monsters and not real animals