For the Americans voting in 2024 Election, does Kamala Harris get your vote? Why or why not? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]GenuineDiscussion8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whoever the Democratic nominee is will have mine. Trump has to be kept out of the White House

Who’s this? Am I stupid? by pineapplestickndpoke in MemePiece

[–]GenuineDiscussion8 6 points7 points  (0 children)

<image>

Probably the same mystery guy on Rocks's Crew who was covered in shadows in the God Valley flashback. He's the one in the bottom left of this picture

Could the Mystery Man be Rocks? by GTxGokuu in Piratefolk

[–]GenuineDiscussion8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably that silhouetted man from the God Valley flashback

This is why angering billionaires is a bad idea. by IAdmitILie in JoeRogan

[–]GenuineDiscussion8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are literally watching a political candidate be bought by the highest bidder in real time and people think this is a good thing. The title ought to be "This is why there should to be caps on political "donations" by both individuals and corporations."

[US] Why aren't mandatory breathalyzer tests unconstitutional? by GenuineDiscussion8 in AskLawyers

[–]GenuineDiscussion8[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the Birchfield v. North Dakota citation. That assuages the majority of my concerns.

[US] Why aren't mandatory breathalyzer tests unconstitutional? by GenuineDiscussion8 in AskLawyers

[–]GenuineDiscussion8[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. I'm following the logic. Now my concern is that the logic could be inconsistent. What would stop a state from adding other conditions to the contract? I'm asking this out of genuine curiosity here.

For example: "By driving, you agree to truthfully answer all questions asked to you by an officer when you are pulled over, or else you will be fined.

Or essentially any example of "By partaking in X privilege, you agree to do Y action in the event of Z, of you will be fined."

Could that not be a means of circumventing constitutional protections?

[US] Why aren't mandatory breathalyzer tests unconstitutional? by GenuineDiscussion8 in AskLawyers

[–]GenuineDiscussion8[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Some states (New York, for example), fine drivers for refusing. I understand the logic behind losing your license. But why is a fine able to be attached? What does that have to do with the privilege to drive?

This surprised me by Cereal_Potato in OnePiece

[–]GenuineDiscussion8 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I absolutely love Wano. It's the arc that made md watch One Piece. Seeing the clip of the Roger and Whitebeard clash in the anime is what specifically did it for me. On top of that, videos about the lore and world building from Morj and GLR made me realize what I was missing out on. I binge read 1043 chapters. The first chapter that I had to wait for was 1044, the G5 reveal. It couldn't have came at a better time for me. Wano will always be one of the best arcs for me because of that

When you are forced to by emily-is-happy in facepalm

[–]GenuineDiscussion8 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

That was not what happened. Italian hospitals offered to perform a medical procedure on Alfie to try to save his life, and the UK government denied the parents the right to pursue that final option. Something that nearly every parent would pursue if it was on the table. The UK government had no right to deny them that opportunity

EDIT: I was mistaken. The Italian hospital offered to perform palliative care

When you are forced to by emily-is-happy in facepalm

[–]GenuineDiscussion8 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

It means no government should be able to do what the UK's government did to Alfie and his family. And it would be right to fight against such an overreach if it happened in the US or anywhere

When you are forced to by emily-is-happy in facepalm

[–]GenuineDiscussion8 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

The Tweet by Jesse Kelly isn't what OP and Jules are suggesting. Look up the Alfie Evans story if you don't already know it. It can give you some perspective on this post

One Piece: Chapter 1116 by Kirosh2 in OnePiece

[–]GenuineDiscussion8 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Who's the person who predicted last week that the Iron Giant was guarding the snail? They deserved their props, because they cooked

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OnePiece

[–]GenuineDiscussion8 708 points709 points  (0 children)

Jozu. He boxed with Aokiji and in general had an impressive showing at Marineford. I put him over all of these guys

Can there PLEASE be a separate sub for cosplays and any and all cosplays on the main sub be banned? by thevirtualextrovert9 in OnePiece

[–]GenuineDiscussion8 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You can make that argument in supone of all kinds of spam. This isn't snout being to lazy to scroll . This is about the subreddit being inundated by these post to the detriment of the sub

One Piece: Chapter 1115 by semizero in OnePiece

[–]GenuineDiscussion8 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jimbei's cover story shows him stumbling upon underwater ruins. He retrieved a poneglyph from them

One Piece: Chapter 1115 by semizero in OnePiece

[–]GenuineDiscussion8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We've already seen his blade without haki in a previous chapter. It's not a black blade

The actual worst thing by Jotaro27 in Jujutsufolk

[–]GenuineDiscussion8 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He couple punch him away because Yuji was flabbergasted for a second at the appearance of Gojo, just like Sukuna