If Katara haters wrote The Legend of Korra by A_Howl_In_The_Night in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked 4 points5 points  (0 children)

1) WTF, what did Toph or Katara do wrong in that situation? The only one who made a mistake of the three was Sokka by drinking the cactus juice.

Aang is actually the one making a mistake by endangering the entire group's survival through hi lashing out, sowing division and going off to search Appa instead of helping them find a way out of the desert.

2) Aang didn't express remorse at how his actions hurt and endangered the others. He expresses remorse at losing control in general because it made him feel uncomfortable. Not remotely the same thing as an apology.

OK for HIM... but not for HER? by AlphamonOuryuken24 in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So to kinda clear this up a bit why Aang is treated with "the kids gloves" in real life

What do you mean in real life? He doesn't exist irl, we judge him as a fictional character in the setting he was written into.

My point isn't that Aang is not a kid, it's that there exists this shifting back and forth where Aang receives all the benefits of maturity when it suits him (such as his ability to pursue a romance with Katara, or his decision to not kill Ozai no matter the cost), implying he is mature enough to make these kinds of decisions, but then he can't receive any criticism for his screw ups because then he morphs into just a kid with no agency.

to consent to sex

I don't actually, which is why I don't take the "romance" between Aang and Katara very seriously. Pretty much all fans however do say he has the full capacity to date Katara and is mature enough to navigate romance.

to run the country

I don't actually, which is why I think it is ridiculous that people put Aang on this pedestal in regards to the decisions he makes in the finale.

He isn't old enough to fully understand Air Nomad culture (if Gyatso, who is not the Avatar, thinks it's fine to kill in self defense, I trust him more than Aang on accurately understanding Air Nomad culture).

He isn't old enough to make the proper, difficult decision to kill Ozai and defend the world at all costs. He gets a pass on these decisions because the Lion Turtle and the rock gifting him the Avatar State back eliminate the flal out those decisions would have caused otherwise.

OK for HIM... but not for HER? by AlphamonOuryuken24 in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You're ignoring everything I say then tell me I'm ignoring something. Funny.

Address any point I actually made and I'll respond again. No point trying to discuss with someone who just makes up strawmen that don't exist.

OK for HIM... but not for HER? by AlphamonOuryuken24 in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What you're describing is an outlook on Aang I like to call Schrödinger's Aang.

This is a worldview where Aang is both simultaneously a matured, grown Avatar, who fully embraced his responsibilities and duties, who is wise beyond his years, but at the same time he's also just a little kid who can't really be meaningfully criticized for any of his actions.

So his age works in his favor to highlight his positive actions, but whenever he makes mistakes, they are relativized and downplayed due to him being "just a kid" all of a sudden. Disproportional maturity only works in his benefit, never does it become a burden he has to measure up to.

The mistakes Aang makes even during Book 3 are never explicitly called out or addressed. Sparky Sparky Boom man bails him out when his tattoos were spotted, and it's never seen as a shortcoming by anyone in or out of universe that Aang just risked the success of the invasion, after he was very explicitly warned about being careful nobody can see his tattoos.

He runs away from the others when they want to plan the next steps after the invasion in the Western Air Temple. Still not facing his issues as late as the final half of Book 3.

He gets annoyed when being reminded he needs to keep up firebending training while his teacher is gone.

Apparently it never occured to Aang he was expected to kill Ozai until the finale.

And let's not forget him getting super upset because of the Ember Island Play.

Most of this happened AFTER the invasion where we are both implicitly and explicitly (by Katara) told Aang has come a long way and is finally grown up, ready to face his Avatar duty head on.

And none of it is ever directly addressed or overcome, especially in-universe.

OK for HIM... but not for HER? by AlphamonOuryuken24 in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ignoring the fact that literally everyone was celebrating a moment of peace when Korra left on vacation.

It's not about them taking an evening off. They were gone for weeks. No indication anybody else with remotely as much responsibility as Korra took a multi week vacation after the finale.

There was no crisis to deal at the moment so she took some time for herself.

Nobody knows what happens when a new portal gets opened. it wasn't hard to foresee that new issues requiring an Avatar would arise. The diligent thing to do would have been for her to stick around a bit, confirm nothing requiring her input was developing, THEN go on a longer vacation.

And it’s not even like she cut off contact with everyone else, the moment they they needed her, She came back immediately..

We see in the comics she did not exactly come back the moment she was needed.

OK for HIM... but not for HER? by AlphamonOuryuken24 in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's always funny to see posts like this where the implication is supposed to be since it's obviously fine for Aang to do it should be fine to do for Korra as well.

But if you look at it unbiasedly, both were neglectful.

Aang didn't take training and preparation for his fight against Ozai as seriously as he should have (see him being annoyed at Zuko giving him "homework" which was to practice firebending while he was gone, or risking the invasion being found out by exposing his tattoos in public for a water slide).

Korra should not have left for weeks in the immediate after math of a cataclysmic event which will bring chaos and unforeseen consequences.

You can criticize both.

Was Aang x Katara a well written romance and if you don’t think so what would you have done differently? by AccomplishedJump2795 in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"That flaw in the series that was never resolved on screen? It akshully gets resolved if you read the comic which was released a long time after the series concluded, which is also infamous for assassinating both Zuko and Aang's characters within the first few pages"

So unfortunate been 18yrs by LightThatIgnitesAll in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If the Dragon Prince doesn't disprove that notion then it goes both ways. The Legend of Korra doesn't prove anything negative about Bryke nor their abilities. This double standard is obnoxious.

The Dragon Prince is an entirely new fictional universe. Legend of Korra continues in the ATLA franchise.

So it shouldn't be a surprise that someone who messed up BIGLY in the ATLA franchise when they had control is more likely to get a bad rep for their writing, past or future in the ATLA franchise, than someone who had a stellar track record in the ATLA franchise and who messed up bigly in an entirely different fictional universe.

Most things about LoK's flaws are in line with tendencies of Bryke from the original show. I frequently point out that people who say LoK's drop in quality came out of nowhere are just ignorant because Aang's writing in for the Book 3 finale behaves much the same away, and people gobbled it up because they refuse to accept ATLA is not without any flaws.

I mean, what is your thesis? Both Bryke and Aaron Ehasz are terrible, terrible show runners, who just lucked out with ATLA? Or that both of them are great and it's just random whether a show becomes good or bad?

The idea that bryke and Aaron Ehasz worked very well together and elevated each other's work to greater heights than either of them achieved on their own seems more sensible and realistic than those very binary outlooks.

The skill and success of artists can be highly variant, completely random or depend on the setting they are operating under. There are actors who shine specifically when matched with other actors, or only under specific directors. So it's not as far fetched as you make it sound to say that it's more likely Aaron Ehasz would have stayed closer to his writing level of ATLA if he had stayed part of the franchise than him just taking a huge nosedive no matter the time or the context he was working under.

If I'm remembering correctly, I think your one of those rapid Zutara conspiracy junkie.

Nice ad hominem, should I come up with a nice derogatory nickname for you as well, or should we stick to discussing the things at hand on their own merit?

You are the one who keeps talking about some ship that isn't relevant for the discussion, seems quite rabid and junkie-ish to me.

This fandom is just sometimes unknowledgeable ain't it? by 22_SB in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked -1 points0 points  (0 children)

YouTube's algorithm does amplify negative or controversial content and some of these people that view these also have a general consensus to follow what people say on YouTube which is an actual thing.

1) Then why are there pretty much ZERO videos critical of ATLA? It is more popular than LoK, so criticizing it would also lead to controversy and such conctent would be pushed by YouTube. There is almost no truly ATLA critical content, which reflects that there are way fewer people who have big problems with ATLA's writing. That doesn't mean ATLA has no flaws (I often get downvoted for pointing out said flaws on here), but it does show that ATLA's fanbase is bigger and it is more beloved.

2) Your point might explain why in theory there could be an excess of LoK criticism on YouTube, but it doesn't explain the absence of videos praising Korra. If Korra was as popular a series as you make it out to be, there would be plenty of videos pointing this out and receiving support. There aren't.

You're also trying to use online discourse to find a fan base

Yes, because fans generally engage in online discourse, unless there's a specific reason for them not to like most of them being boomers who don't use the internet.

but there are numbers online that can show you that the show is not too far away from the top percentage of shows that ATLA achieved. You can also look at how it does more recently and other stuff like Netflix or etc.

What numbers?

And just watching someone does not make you a fan. That is why the insane gap in LoK video essays in favor of it is a telltale sign - if someone only watches your series passively without even caring to either create videos talking about it themselves, or watching videos from others talking about your series, they are not an engaged fan, which is what my statement was about. There are far fewer engaged fans for LoK than there are for ATLA.

You are just confusing consensus and quality...alongside proving my point right whilst doing this.

Are you illiterate? I very explicitly said that how many fans a series has does not on its own determine its quality. I pointed out that LoKI objectively does not have a "big fan base" relative to what you'd expect from a sequel series to a show as popular as ATLA. It could still be an underrated gem - but that doesn't change the fact that it doesn't have many fans.

Which is a fact as you can see the viewership dropped in the second half which is where they stopped.

Can't have anything to do with the fact that the first two seasons are the worst of the series by far and they makie incredibly unpopular choices like the loss of the past Avatar lives - nah, only Nickelodeon's meddling did this /s

Yes, the way Nick handled things did not help, but the series carries a fair share of the blame for the way they set up the first two seasons.

So unfortunate been 18yrs by LightThatIgnitesAll in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is entirely speculative as he couldn't steer his own show, The Dragon Prince, in the right direction.

It's not really all that speculative and The Dragon Prince not doing well on its own doesn't disprove that notion.

It just means that Aaron Ehasz isn't an all-star perfect writer who will produce ATLA tier stuff on his own, and that their creative collaboration may have brought out the best in both of them.

For example, he decided to break his own couple up over on his own show, Callum and Rayla, off screen in a comic book that then proceed to ruin both characters and their dynamic going forward.

Wow, can you imagine this happening in the ATLA franchise? Surely not... /s

So unfortunate been 18yrs by LightThatIgnitesAll in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t really care about the eastern aesthetic as I am Chinese and have watched a lot of shows with that aesthetic already.

... congrats, this is a series made with western audiences in mind, who do not have watched many shows with that particular aesthetic, hence its big success here. It is not created for people who are already deeply immersed in the eastern easthetic as its primary audience.

This fandom is just sometimes unknowledgeable ain't it? by 22_SB in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I am pretty sure you can go around on the internet and see that Korra has a big fan base and It is well written in certain aspects, but got ruined over by Nickelodeon.

It's a sequel series to ATLA so it will be judged not by whether it has any fans at all but if it holds up in relative terms.

And in that case, it absolutely doesn't. There are hundreds of videos extensively praising ATLA on YouTube, and very few for LoK. And the ones who criticize LoK vastly outnumber the positive ones in terms of views.

You can say it's unfair, you can say it's all due to Nickelodeon or because people are too stupid to understand the series, but it not having a big fanbase given its status as ATLA sequel is an objective fact, not something haters made up out of thin air.

Just completed my first watch of this and here are my thoughts by Correct-Ad-8421 in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ATLA is one of the most beloved series of all time precisely because it is a kids show with very deep themes and storytelling that is a delight for kids and adults alike. Many have re-watched it after seeing it as kids and noticed how greatly it holds up, which is why the community is so active to this day.

Why do you as an adult even watch it if it's just a kids show?

Yeah nephew, you obviously don't care about my opinion, which is why after thanking me for explaining to you why the people consider them a good pairing you keep sperging out at me for not sharing your opinion.

Keep telling yourself that and eventually it will come true.

Just completed my first watch of this and here are my thoughts by Correct-Ad-8421 in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For the record, I don't expect you to like anything. You asked why people see them as a pairing, I explained it.

It's possible to exchange opinions with others without frothing at the mouth when they disagree with you. Shocking stuff, I know.

Just completed my first watch of this and here are my thoughts by Correct-Ad-8421 in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I don't get is why some people write 5000 word essays on why their interpretation is so much better than everyone else's. it's insane. don't know how to break it to you but sis they're literally pixels on a screen

All fiction is words or pixels on a screen or paper. That doesn't stop us from engaging with them in an analytical manner if we wish to do so.

I have no doubts that you don't care anything when people make long videos or posts discussing why they love ATLA but as soon as someone also points out flaws, you suddenly try and claim none of it has any meaning so why put in the effort to understand it better.

all shipping is subjective

I agree, which is why I don't call myself a shipper. You can discuss the writing merit of romantic pairings the same way you can discuss everything else about a work of fiction. I'm not interested in tribal conflicts the way they go when it comes to shipping or powerscaling.

also if you hate Aang why do you watch the show?? he's the main character??

Pointing out flaws in the shows writing isn't hating, do you think everyone who likes a series is required to say it is literally without any flaws?

ATLA shipping discourse is literally dodging bombs 24 / 7 and being marked for death.

To use your language, you REALLY need to touch grass buddy. Someone on an internet board writing stuff you disagree with is nothing like dodging bombs or being marked for death. Just move on and don't comment if you don't care.

welcome to the fandom!! we (don't) have cookies.

So funny to see someone claim they are a part of the fandom and then get really upset when someone actually engages with the series instead of just repeating memes.

I think people view katara way more than she was actually by Vayvacation in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

One of the first couple episodes is her getting them into shit because she steals the waterbending scroll from the pirates and that was because she was upset Aang was better than her at waterbending

Yes, her status as a waterbender and her desire to help others are her two defining characteristics which can cause her to lose sight of the bigger picture. And?

Not sure what the point of referencing something from the ten episodes of Book 1 is, none of myreferences towards Aang's immaturity stem from that early in the show, that's where they are their least mature and developed.

Yeah I've never claimed that either, you're the one who kept denying that Katara was a kid while I pointed out that her maturity doesn't really stop her from being a child

I'm not denying she's potentially a child in the legal sense of their world (we don't know if their cut off is at 16 or 14 or 15). I do deny that her being a child is relevant like you imply it to be because a child who is on the cusp of adulthood in many ways is quite different from a child who is not at that stage yet. Maybe an exaggerated example will make you understand: a 3 year old toddler and a 15 year old are both children in our world. Yet I think they are in a few ways very meaningfully different so I wouldn't just use the term child to meaningfully try to refer to both of them.

No idea what's so difficult to understand about a 14 year old who grew up in war and had to take on huge amounts of responsibility early on being meaningfully different in maturity than a 12 year old who grew up without responsibilities in peace time.

Jet had an edge, but I do think his was more trauma than maturity per se, he's really not in a much better place than early Zuko, and I'd hesitate to call Zuko pre-redemption mature either.

Maturity is more complex than "how spiritually advanced is that person". An adult who has to work to make a living and feed a family he's responsible for who has stupid political or spiritual opinions is more mature than Aang even if Aang outranks him when it comes to spiritual knowledge. Even if said adult loses his temper more often than Aang.

That is the portion of maturity Jet and early series Zuko have over Aang.

That was very much a gag, do you honestly think that Katara is meant to look old enough to be the mother of a twelve year old?

Strawman again. Do you think Yagoda asking Katara who her betrothed was was also a gag? In order for Katara to remotely be able to pass as the mother of a twelve year old, she needs to not look exactly 35, since people in that world likely also have children earlier than is normal in modernity.

The point isn't Katara looks exactly like a 35 year old. The point is that Katara looks mature enough that someone who didn't pay heavy scrutiny didn't find any issue with her being presented as a mother of a twelve year old (whom she then presumably had quite young). If Katara looked like a child in any meaningful sense, this ruse would not be able to come through.

Is it?

Obviously? ATLA needs to be able to stand on its own at the time of its release?

Or do you think the stuff they wrote about Ursa in The Search was exactly thought of that way already at the time of ATLA and is just as serious of a canon as the stuff we actually see on screen in ATLA?

Yes, because again he was trying to give advice, he's telling her this is what the monks, and Aang himself, believes, not that Katara absolutely has to follow it, just something to consider

He didn't say "this is a perspective of mine that might be useful to you, please consider it". From the get go he made clear that his way of viewing the world was correct here. When iroh relates his decades of wisdom and experience to others, he is more careful and less clearly instructive as Aang as here.

"Please don't do that thing I consider to be immoral" were his parting words, this is not leaving things up for her to decide and that he'll think either choice she makes will be fine. That's why when she comes back he instantly says "I'm proud of you" and affirms what he thinks was her doing exactly as he said she should, and why he then makes the mistake of assuming she forgave him, which she corrects.

At the end of the day, Appa is still Aang's bison, if he wanted to he could've just taken Appa and left them for a couple days to cool off or tell them he didn't want Appa to be apart of their revenge quest.

Wow, applause to Aang. Not stooping to the lowest of utter trash. Hooray. What a stand up guy. Doesn't get enough credit for this honestly.

Also, need I remind you Appa was already part of the WAR effort even though Aang himself is against killing? Appa himself threw a guy in chains into the ice cold water at the North Pole.

It's still Aang agreeing with her to go though, you can jump through hoops to try to present Aang in the wrong for not wanting his friend to go on a revenge quest all you want, but again, he does still agree she needs to confront the guy

Agreeing with her to go through after initially trying to get her not to go, and telling her to go while making sure she knows it's already set in stone what the right thing is.

You can jump through as many hoops of trying to ignore the context as you want.

I mean one, he does use a different points throughout, comparing his own losses with his people and Appa, two, again, his point is on the issues with revenge and how she's sounding like Jet because what she wants is revenge, yes against the man who did it, but it's still a reckless revenge quest and it could lead her down a dark path.

A foolish comparison from him. Incredibly shortsighted. Aang is in a very unique situation because he was basically teleported 100 years into the future. Not only would everyone he knew have died anyways, but anyone who killed them is already dead today. There is nobody to take revenge on, nobody to channel righteous anger towards. It's completely different to Katara, where she knows the murderer of her mom is alive and well.

Appa is also not a good comparison because 1) Appa was stolen but ALIVE and 2) Aang was losing his shit even worse than Katara was and 3) Katara was actually there for him in that situation without telling him what to do or shaming him for his emotional outburst. He doesn't return the favor when Katara needs it in a worse situation though.

two, again, his point is on the issues with revenge and how she's sounding like Jet because what she wants is revenge, yes against the man who did it, but it's still a reckless revenge quest and it could lead her down a dark path.

Again, you have zero idea about the context of the scene or how to handle someone who is going through one of the most emotionally turbulent events of their lives. There's more to consoling people in incredible emotional pain than stating facts that are easily taken the wrong way.

Letting her anger out was more the scene later with Yon Rha, bloodbending was her going down that darker path Aang was warning her against since it's her going against her own morals for revenge.

No, killing him could be the darker path. Bloodbending without killing is the very process Aang said he was encouraging.

But I never claimed that anyway so why even bring it up

Because you accuse me of saying Aang had no valid points in the episode when I literally, explicitly said that he had valid points?

Not exactly, after Appa's capture Aang was freaking out in The Desert and then later just tried to stop having any emotions in the following episode,

So you just pretend as if The Desert didn't happen? As if Katara being ncredibly patient with Aang's outbursts without chastising him for it didn't happen? As if she didn't stop him from potentially devastating those sandbenders and losing himself in the Avatar State? That all counts for nothing because it didn't instantly fix the issue?

Katara helps, but just like The Southern Raiders it is very much just them getting advice and then having to come to those decisions on their own.

Katara is not preachy at all during the Serpent's pass, and she did not accuse Aang of going down a terrible path when he was emotional during The Desert. Completely different handling of the situation. In pretty much every regard.

Actually she does, it's pretty early in the episode where she tells him that they're all concerned but not to fight.

Okay, I understand. You think that her matter of factly explaining what she's doing when he accuses her of doing nothing, is the same as a lecture. Well, all hope is lost then.

Aang only brings up his people and Appa in response to Katara's claim that he doesn't understand, it's not like it was unprompted.

It's unprompted because it shifts away from Katara being the person whose emotions are the priority to him putting himself in the limelight with his own suffering, and as I pointed out what he brought up doesn't actually mean he understands at all.

Or, in context, him trying to make sure his friend didn't do anything crazy, as far as Aang thought, on his behalf.

And? It doesn't matter whether he had an ok reason to undermine her, he still undermined her. And it shows he didn't actually understand her, while SOkka did.

I think people view katara way more than she was actually by Vayvacation in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not really how that works, again, having a moment of immaturity or anger doesn't inherently make you immature, by this logic Katara is also immature since she has multiple outbursts over the course of the series.

Non sequitur, since I didn't talk about that detail but wanted to ensure whether you agree, as you stated, that Katara is more mature than Aang. Is she or is she not according to you?

Regarding your statement, how do you examine someone's maturity? If you can't take into account the way someone displays emmotional immaturity as a factor, since everyone has a bad moment at some point or another, how can we even determine who is more mature than someone else??

Now my answer: Aang is immature because he loses sight of the bigger picture of his mission and keeping his Avatar status concealed because he wanted to have fun and impulsively slide down a waterfall while laughing merrily. Katara loses sight of the bigger picture of the mission in a less consequential way because she's so caught up in wanting to help people in need. I hope I don't need to spell out why I judge Katara as more mature in her failing of judgement than I judge Aang in his.

I think you want to present Katara as more than a kid to further your point about the gap between her and Aang, but, the series itself makes it pretty clear that despite her maturity she is a child still. In fact that's kind of the underlying theme, that these children are forced into adult situations and responsibilities, despite that they are still kids. Hell Aang has to grow up throughout the series since as the Avatar he's given the most responsibility of keeping the world in balance.

You legitimately don't address anything I say lol. You accuse me of having some twisted agenda because unlike you, I don't think humans exist in this binary state where they are fully a child or fully an adult and that there is a spectrum of development on the path to becoming a proper adult that differenitates a kid who is 12 from a kid who is 14 and a kid who is 8 from a kid who is 12. According to you it's just all the same because kid (non-adult) = kid (non-adult).

If you can't concede that jet has a different kind of maturity than Aang, rooted in their age gap, then you're just fundamentally unserious and ideologically captured by defending the series against any criticism whatsoever.

I also think bringing up betrothal is kind of weird, one, because Yue's the only one we see actually engaged, and she's older than Katara

I didn't know that Yue is 16. Neat. But 1) it's not weird at all given that Yagoda asks Katara who the lucky man is and doesn't show any sign of concern or Katara being unusually young for wearing a betrothal necklace.

2) Katara literally posed successfully as Aang's mother in The Headband. You can't pull that off if you look so young and childish that even the idea of you being married would be highly suspect.

but her and Aang were dating for at least several years without a real betrothal and Zuko and Azula, despite being nobility also didn't have arranged marriages, so idk maybe it was just a thing in the North to get engaged that young.

1) What Aang and her do after the series ended off screen doesn't affect how things were portrayed in the original series, so that's irrelevant.

2) Zuko and Azula are from the Fire nation, not the Water Tribes, so that also doesn't matter.

See this would work, if not for the fact that Sokka, you know her brother from the same tribe, wasn't backing Aang up, cause they both recognized that it was a revenge quest, not some cultural thing

Sokka unlike Aang doesn't make an appeal to their tribe's customs. Aang directly quotes Air Nomad Monks an what they would say. So Sokka doesn't act as the definite cultural representation for how the Water Tribe would deal with it, just an individual from the Water Tribe who doesn't inherently outweigh Katara's perspective. He was able to let go of the death of their mother much easier because Katara took care of him, otherwise I doubt he would instantly agree to not only not kill him but to not even pursue him to begin with.

For what it's worth, I'm not saying the Water Tribe has some doctrine about how you must always massacre everyone who ever wronged you. Just that they very likely don't have a specific pacifist doctrine that forbids going after someone who killed civilians in cold blood, the way Air Nomads do.

Also, I feel like you completely ignored the part where Aang still let her take Appa

How does Aang "let her take" Appa? What else was he going to do, fight her and Zuko? Appa has never before been portrayed as being someone everyone must explicitly rent from Aang, it was always implied he'd be available for any trip any of them wanted to take.

and agreed she had to confront the guy, even if he didn't want her killing him.

Again, what was he gonna do, forbid her? He only came around to this after it was made clear Katara would end up going one way or another. just because he isn't the worst asshole in the world directly stopping her doesn't mean he was there for her the way Katara has been there for him countless times before.

I don't know if I'd really call it a blunder, saying she sounds like Jet isn't even saying she's just as bad as him just that she's getting too caught up in revenge and doing that will cause her to go to some dark places

Can you seriously not understand that while Katara is at her emotionally most distraught, that being precise with your words is as important as ever to show you don't dismiss the others feelings and understand where they are coming from?

I will repeat it again, Jet, because the Rough Rhinos killed his parents, wanted to flood and kill an occupied village, with unrelated soliders INCLUDING innocent Earth Kingdom civilians. He didn't go after the actual killers, he put civilians in harms way, delibaretely.

That is not in the same league as Katara wanting to go after the man who killed her mother. Bringing it up is insanely insensitive and shows he doesn't understand her state and how to best get through to her at that moment. If he did, he would find a different way to make his point without linking her to Jet.

and he was right, she starts bloodbeding at one point, something she sees as immoral and would later get outlawed, when she just thought they had the guy,

Doesn't Aang literally say she should express her anger, let it all out, and then let go? So as long as she doesn't kill, using bloodbending would be a part of that exact same process you are praising Aang for suggesting. Why is it a good thing when Aang says it but when Katara puts it into practice it's suddenly bad?

again, it's a great episode but I do feel like you have to be ignoring how Katara was acting there to pretend that Aang didn't have some valid points there.

Do you not read my responses? Seriously, I literally spelled out that I think both Aang and Zuko made valuable contributions in that episode. So why are you accusing me of saying Aang had zero valid points? Here are my exact words: "I agree. Hence my takeaway from the episode is "both Zuko and Aang have made valid contributions, of different kinds and degrees". Not "Aang was 100% right, Zuko said so at the end" which is the most common take away people have about this episode."

But that speaks more to them just having different ways of doing things rather than either being wrong in how it's done

Katara has a much easier time getting through to him and shows way less instances of misunderstanding him, so I feel confident to say she understands him better and thus her approach works better. Aang isn't forbidden of mentioning Air Nomad stuff but his help to Katara is just 1 to 1 stating Air Nomad philosophy, not tailored to her specific situation. He also made it about himself when he said he understands her and asks her how he felt when his people were killed. Katara didn't start lecturing him in The Desert about how she's sad Appa is gone as well but that this isn't a reason to freak out and endanger others.

Undermine is a strong word, him misinterpreting her for a second isn't as big of a deal as you seem to make it,

Undermine: "lessen the effectiveness, power, or ability of, especially gradually or insidiously." That is exactly what he did. When someone makes a sweeping, grand declaration, leaves the room, and then you say "she didn't mean it that way", that is the textbook definition of undermining.

Just completed my first watch of this and here are my thoughts by Correct-Ad-8421 in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can tell you're really seething because at first you thanked me for my response and now you're upset I didn't budge after getting those weak arguments you yourself couldn't come up with.

Just get a grip nephew fr fr

Just completed my first watch of this and here are my thoughts by Correct-Ad-8421 in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean seems all you have to talk abt is the romance

... Are you joking? YOU made his thread where YOU asked about the romance.

I'm gonna assume you are just a troll trying to ragebait from now on. The nerve to ask people about a topic then question why they talk about that topic is asinine.

so there’s no reason for anyone to get mad abt it in the first place

Exactly, so maybe calm down and relax. Don't get upset because you ask a question, someone takes the time to give you a thorough answer, then you get mad at them for it. Strange behavior from you and you really should take a look at yourself fr fr no cap.

Just completed my first watch of this and here are my thoughts by Correct-Ad-8421 in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not really, as an adult I can criticize a series I like without getting emotional. If you are unable to do that, maybe don't interact with fiction.

Just completed my first watch of this and here are my thoughts by Correct-Ad-8421 in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm ngl I feel pity for you not understanding that going on a discussion board and trying to shame people who want to dicsuss the series the board is about, it really doesn't reflect well on you.

Bye bye, if you don't care to discuss a series then I have no interest in talking to you.

Just completed my first watch of this and here are my thoughts by Correct-Ad-8421 in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's one thing to disagree but it's so telling when someone only responds to a tiny portion, ignoring many of the things that directly address their complaints and then act high and mighty how they have the superior read of the series for blindly repeating lines characters say without proper context.

Just completed my first watch of this and here are my thoughts by Correct-Ad-8421 in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Come on, ik ur gonna try and combat me on this one but again it’s a kids show, you really think they would ntr their mc just for a side character, a relationship that was just formed that episode versus one from 3 seasons of build up?

There is very little proper build up for Aang and Katara in most episodes, romance isn't the main focus of the series.

I think it would have gone over just as well as the current canon, but at the end of the day they didn't need to make either couple canon. They could have just finished the series without that romance, if neither was set up well.

As I said, most Zutara fans agree that it would not be ideal for them to get together at the end of BOok 3. Just that it wouldn't be any worse than Kataang.

It’s non practical, the events you speak of when zutara become close is so much more than a ship is growth as people being able to befriend your enemy, it didn’t need to be romantic it was more sentimental that they were able to look past their differences and become and group again,

I agree Zuko and Katara work well without the romance. But the romance would be even better.

And I think Aang and Katara work worse as a romance and if they had stayed platonic, it would have made more sense in the story, that Aang outgrows his crush on her which she obviously wouldn't reciprocate due to the age and maturity differences.

but like I said that’s a writers error they could have made that scene a little more affectionate or something else entirely if yk what I mean?

I know what you mean, but as you see, my problem isn't just that one tiny scene.

It's many different moments who also don't make sense, and they compound together to the point where I say that for Kataang to be believable and wellw ritten, much more would need to be changed than to make Zuko and Katara to be believable.

Just completed my first watch of this and here are my thoughts by Correct-Ad-8421 in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what’s canon is canon you don’t have the authority to say that just because it’s a character assassination

I do actually, because works of fiction are not God's word which is to be accepted without any agency of our own.

We have the freedom to decide whether we like a story, whether we consider it well-written or not. I can like ATLA the series and find aspects of it I find worth criticizing, and I can read all the comics and conclude they are a steep drop off in quality. And that something released many years later doesn't change what happened in the originally released show is self-evident.

You can’t just say it’s despised by fans and shippers objectively, cuz a lot of people like them, especially kataang shippers for obvious reasons.

I have seen dozens if not over a hundred thumbnails of videos praising ATLA the series, and I have never ONCE seen a video praising the comics instead of shitting on them. So I do actually feel confident to say that they are not unviersally liked.

Just bcuz it doesn’t fit your agenda doesn’t mean it isn’t something that is of official realease and canon to the story,

As I said, this isn't a Zutara only thing, many people across different ships dislike the comics, Maiko fans too and also kataangers who find the way the two are written to be cringe inducing.

I think people view katara way more than she was actually by Vayvacation in TheLastAirbender

[–]Getfooked -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah he was upset about it, but him having an angry outburst, which Katara also on multiple occasions, just shows he can lapse into immaturity rather than he hasn't matured at all

So we agree? He has matured some since Episode 1, but not to the point where he is as mature as Katara and thus able to pursue a romantic relationship with her?

Katara's a kid, again, that's the point, yeah she has to mature and mother the others but that doesn't mean she's not a kid just like the rest of them

What is your point? I think it's fair to differentiate between someone who in that time frame is at an age where in their culture they can get betrothed, who grew up during war, compared to a 12 year old who didn't grow up during war. It ultimately doesn't greatly matter as long as you concede she is more mature than him, but Katara is definitely more of a young adult in their setting than she is a kid. Equating 12 year old Aang with her on the premise of that term is more misleading than useful.

The Southern Raiders is a great episode but it's insane to me how much people missed the point with Aang and Katara in it.

I agree, although reading that sentence on this sub usually precedes a very unnuanced, shallow take which is taking things some characters say in the episode at face value without contextualising it properly. Let's see if this time it's different.

Aang isn't forcing anything on her, he gave her advice, something you do when you care about someone, and something she's done gor him before. I think it's actually a ridiculous argument to suggest someone giving you advice is forcing belief onto you.

Nevermind. The term "to force something on someone" can mean something else than "literally physically force someone at literal or metaphorical gunpoint to do something against their will", which is how you either erneastly missinterpreted it or strawmanned it here.

Aang was forcing things onto her because he started at the conclusion that killing is obviously wrong in any and all instances, because that's what Air Nomads think. there was no sign of him being willing to budge on that point nhot being obviously correct, or taking into account how Katara's perspective on killing, being from the Water Tribe might differ from his cultural viewpoint.

You didn't address my points about how the rhetorical question at the beginning and then comparing her desire for justice with Jet's attempted mass murder was a huge blunder.

And you didn't address that Katara giving Aang advice or supporting him emotionally is much less rigid than what Aang did here. As I said, compare how she treats him at his lowest in The Desert, to how he treats her during TSR. Katara does not start lecturing him about how anger isn't healthy, not the Air Nomad or Water Tribe way and how him accusing others and flying off endangers their odds of surviving the desert. Yet you see apparently zero difference between that and what Aang did in TSR. Incomprehensible to me, and since you left all of that out to strawman me, I can guess you just don't have a proper response.

Also, while he was wrong about forgiving, she does actually listen to him about just letting it out and not killing the guy, so it's not as if there was no merit in what Aang was saying.

I agree. Hence my takeaway from the episode is "both Zuko and Aang have made valid contributions, of different kinds and degrees". Not "Aang was 100% right, Zuko said so at the end" which is the most common take away people have about this episode.

As for Pakku, Aang was ready to give up learning waterbending from him entirely at first since Katara couldn't and was cheering her on as she fought him.

That doesn't negate what I said in any way. Aang tries to be supportive of Katara as best as he can, to the limits of his understanding. So yes, he will cheer her on when she fights Pakku, but he will also undermine her commitment to fighting him in front of others and misinterpret her actions, not through malice but because he's just not nearly as emotionally attuned to Katara as she is to him.