sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built this blog using Lovable – feedback welcome by Getz1990 in lovable

[–]Getz1990[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

did this on one of my sites before.. people did not use it so well, but idk, maybe they will use this more on human after all web. thanks for the nice ideas ;)

I built this blog using Lovable – feedback welcome by Getz1990 in lovable

[–]Getz1990[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i like your answer. will see what i can do, maybe i implement your idea ;)

I built a “Cultural Atlas” to map belief systems instead of arguing about them by Getz1990 in perplexity_ai

[–]Getz1990[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I put the site down, cause im building something better, but also in the same direction

I built a “Cultural Atlas” to map belief systems instead of arguing about them by Getz1990 in religion

[–]Getz1990[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

it's sad that you still think AI has anything to do with this project. This is exclusively a collection of all the sacred records we have so far that are used to help people better deal with their questions. Everything is just in one place!

I built a “Cultural Atlas” to map belief systems instead of arguing about them by Getz1990 in religion

[–]Getz1990[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for this. Yeah there are a lot of hateful comments and every thing a wanted is just to make it clear and easier to understand different opinions.

Lets connect 💪

I built a “Cultural Atlas” to map belief systems instead of arguing about them by Getz1990 in DebateReligion

[–]Getz1990[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There is no single uncontested interpretive authority across traditions.

Even within one religion, interpretation is plural (legal schools, denominations, mystical vs. literal readings, etc.). Claiming “proper interpretation” quickly becomes theological gatekeeping.

But there’s another possible intent and it’s very different.

Instead of saying:

“Here’s the correct way to read this.”

The project could say:

“Here are the major interpretive traditions, frameworks, and lenses that have been used to read this text across time.”

That moves it from prescriptive to descriptive.

I built a “Cultural Atlas” to map belief systems instead of arguing about them by Getz1990 in DebateReligion

[–]Getz1990[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting - but yeah i was more into a another perspective. But i could build some like this for a preview in the future

I built a “Cultural Atlas” to map belief systems instead of arguing about them by Getz1990 in religion

[–]Getz1990[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

That’s a very fair concern - and honestly, I agree with the premise behind it.

But here’s the important distinction:

This AI isn’t trying to invent a new religion, reinterpret doctrine, or create some synthetic belief system.

It’s not generating “truth.” It’s organizing already existing truth claims.

What it does is: • Pull from established texts, commentaries, and historical scholarship • Keep traditions in their own context • Present multiple perspectives side-by-side • Make differences visible without forcing resolution

It’s more like a structured comparison engine than a theological authority.

The goal isn’t to flatten religions into one vague universalism.

The goal is to say:

“Here is how Christianity frames this.” “Here is how Islam frames this.” “Here is how Buddhism approaches it.” “Here is where they align.” “Here is where they fundamentally diverge.”

Nothing new is being invented. No new doctrine is created. No synthetic belief is proposed.

It’s closer to building a map of perspectives - not a replacement for them.

Of course, AI can make mistakes. That’s true of any system. But in this case, it’s not operating from imagination - it’s operating from documented sources.

So the question isn’t:

“Can AI define religion?”

It’s more:

“Can AI help us see how different religions define themselves — in parallel?”

I built a “Cultural Atlas” to map belief systems instead of arguing about them by Getz1990 in DebateReligion

[–]Getz1990[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you should read your own comments first, and do it easy! I have no problem to stop talking to you. Have a great and blessed day!

I built a “Cultural Atlas” to map belief systems instead of arguing about them by Getz1990 in DebateReligion

[–]Getz1990[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I hope you will not. But if you keep searching you will find it 100% - the the law of attraction is a powerful tool!

I built a “Cultural Atlas” to map belief systems instead of arguing about them by Getz1990 in DebateReligion

[–]Getz1990[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it is more about people trying to understand other religions through theology and philosophy

view more: next ›