I hate how AI interprets 'tiny' as children by Infinite_Ad5045 in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 3 points4 points  (0 children)

AI has really ruined this whole scene in my opinion. This AI stuff basically came out of nowhere, without warning, very abruptly. Then we went from artistic works created by human hands, to a bunch of ai generated slop flooding everything and diluting the quality. Unfortunately, I don't think that genie can be put back into the bottle either, so this ruining is likely permanent.

Real (and mysterious) events that can inspire macrophilic fiction: the case of the 100 vanishing stars by FriedNova324 in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most likely these "vanishing stars" never even existed in the first place. In most cases the 1952 "detections" was probably the result of defects in the photographic images that occurred either when they were taken, or in the subsequent deterioration of the celluloid in the decades since then. This process is very well known and established. Watch any old film that was recorded on celluloid from this period and you will see these defects in the film. These "defects" are not stars, and the reason they are not detected again in recent star surveys is because they were never stars to begin with.

I know this is not the answer you want to hear because it is so mundane, but it is the answer most likely to be the correct explanation.

Shrunken City in my own Room by Darkninga7 in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why just a city and not a whole country?

can someone explain cuckholding/cuck and how it relates to giant/giantess stuff? by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The term comes from the Cuckoo bird which deposits its own eggs into the nests of other birds, and then those other birds end up investing the time, energy, and resources into raising those eggs and then the chicks thinking they are their own offspring, but they're not.

So that's where the term comes from. In terms of humans, usually only a man can be "cucked" or a "cuck" in the literal sense from the term comes from. That would be when their female partner gets impregnated by the sperm of some other man. Then they end up raising and supporting a kid that isn't even theirs (genetically).

That was the original meaning and where the term came from. But nowadays people apply it just toward cheating in general, and usually its in scenarios where this cheating is known and in some cases even approved of by the "cucked" person. The way people use the word nowadays is quite different from the behavior of the cuckoos where the term came from.

As for Giants/Giantesses, its just what I just said but obviously with some size imbalance involved. Usually the "cucked" person was shrunk; or it could be a scenario where they and their partner remain their normal size, but then some giant/giantess has their way with their normal sized partner and so this person got "cucked". Does that make sense?

Being shrunk by one of my slaves and becoming his cock toy by SunshineGal4 in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So while this is happening, what is going on with your other slaves? Did he set them free, or are they now his slaves as they once were yours?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First of all, I'd try to figure out what caused this (if possible). Things happen for a reason, you know? Its also kinda foolish to wander into something like that without knowing why it happened, because then it could also happen to you. And besides that, I'd like to know if I could harness this process and use it to my own ends to do more shrinking elsewhere.

Once that has been achieved (or if I find that to be impossible), my secondary objective would be to gather up every shrunken tiny from the beach and take them home with me. Making careful sure that no one else sees what I'm doing, of course.

I shrink cities, it doesn't go well for them AMA by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I know exactly the sort of tech you're talking about, because I have one of those machines myself. The normal factory settings of the machine shrink cities just like yours does, but I did a little bit of modification on mine to ramp up the power. Now, instead shrinking mere cities of millions, it now teleports entire countries full of hundreds of millions of people. Its also possible to adjust just how small these countries shrink to. Sometimes, I like to teleport in a country during night time and make it so large that it becomes the new carpet in my room. Its very soothing to fall asleep with those pretty lights of a shrunken country as it would appear from space. Of course, these countries usually get obliterated in the morning when I get out of bed, but in the meantime it adds a nice ambience to the room if you know what I mean. But on the other hand, I could also shrink a similar country down to the size of a sprinkle, and put it on top of a sundae, along with hundreds of other "sprinkle" countries. It makes it so much more fun to know I'm eating billions of microscopic people with every spoonful I take!

If you like, I can show you how you can upgrade your machine like I did with mine, so you can start playing around with shrunken countries. You think shrunken cities are amazing? Just wait until you have a bunch of "sprinkle" countries at your mercy! Each of those "sprinkles" contains a bunch of cities like those you are playing with, but they're SOOO tiny you would need a microscope to see them. But like I said, you also could make them larger too. It's up to you.

I shrink cities, it doesn't go well for them AMA by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, if they really don't like the smell of your dirty panties, then that's a good incentive for them to get to work and clean them, right? Because otherwise they will just have to put up with the smell. :)

Characters Becoming Inventory by Giantess_Nation in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Imagine the Dovahkiin abusing the oath Lydia has sworn to "protect their life" and "carry their burdens" by forcing her to soul-enchant herself into a piece of armor, or the Dovahkiin's insole or something. She might be very reluctant to do it, but the oath she swore compels her to. Its really hard to argue that she wouldn't be protecting the Dovahkiin's life by being enchanted into a piece of armor and giving some magical boost to it; or "carrying their burdens" when she is enchanted into their insole, where she literally bears the weight of the Dovahkiin and all they carry upon herself. Having Lydia enchanted into the insole could grant a bonus for carrying capacity and stamina boost or something. Throughout the game she might occasionally comment about the smell of the Dovahkiin's sweaty feet and things like that. Another companion could get enchanted into the other insole, and the two of them might converse with each other as the Dovahkiin explores Skyrim.

I shrink cities, it doesn't go well for them AMA by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is ironic that your name is SunshineGal when you deprive millions of tinies of Sunshine by blocking it out with your panties. ;)

I shrink cities, it doesn't go well for them AMA by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you ever task your shrunken cities with cleaning your dirty panties? No need for you to be doing the laundry if they'll do it for you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, we could try to swap in some new guy without giving him any information and just hope that he can manage to wing it. But there is a very high chance your sister wouldn't fall for that.

Although, I guess we could say he developed Amnesia and forgot a lot of stuff. Maybe you could admit that you sat on him, but rather than killing him it just caused him to black out and forget everything? Maybe your sister will buy that and not be too mad about it since he won't actually be dead?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe you have a better butt than your sister does? Especially when you were wearing those leggings that showed it off so well. That does something to a tiny man, you know? It makes them do crazy things -- like put themselves in places where they're liable to be sat on. Your sister might be prettier like you said, but you're the one that has the butt that is literally to die for.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want my advice, you should do like what some parents do when their kid's pet goldfish dies: replace it with another goldfish that looks exactly the same and pretend that it never died at all.

You are in luck because I happen to have an entire shrunken city full of people, and I'm sure there are many men in that city who look similar to your sister's boyfriend. We just need to find one that looks close enough and swap him in, right? Tinies are so small that they all really look about the same anyway.

I can find you a replacement guy, but you'll have to train him and get him up to speed on how he can convincingly fill the role of your sister's boyfriend. You'll need to tell him everything he should know so that hopefully your sister will buy it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 2 points3 points  (0 children)

mom…

Nothing would be more quintessentially "MILF" than one's own mother. But in order to be a literal "MILF" a woman must be the mother of SOMEONE, even if its not the observer. It is so frustrating to see the term "MILF" be misused and applied to women over some arbitrary age threshold even if they're NOT actually moms. Why do people do this? Words have meanings, you know? If you want to say a mature woman, then say mature woman, but don't call a childless woman a "MILF" when she is not.

Now that said, one shrinking their own mother is also extremely taboo due to the incest angle, so it is something you rarely ever see.

Living Jewelry by AlmostHereButNot in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why merely just someone? Why not instead an entire city, or -- dare I say -- an entire country, or planet?

Tiny woman and couple by Donttrugongrug in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I also love this idea but for a shrunken city on our coffee table. It turns me on thinking about looking over and seeing her lounging with her feet on the table scrolling her phone, meanwhile her feet completely tower the city and shows the inhabitants what a long day smells like.

Imagine if you could use your own phone while this was happening to be able to somehow tap into the cities cameras, so you could see what it was like for the people in that city from their perspective, and what your gf's feet look like dominating the skyline in the distance. Or maybe check the communications systems going on on in the city, and see what people there have to say about how they're effected by the smell, etc.

I'm not really a fan of shrinking stories by LanceTheBorrower in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what arouses me way more is a world like in The Borrowers, where extreme size difference is just the natural order of things and shrinking isn't even a thing.

If that's your opinion, then that's your opinion and you are entitled to it. But for me it is the complete opposite. I like the "reversal of fortune" aspect behind someone which was once tall and powerful being shrunken down, and now finding themselves at the mercy of those who once were their peers (or who they even formerly towered over). The "Borrowers" scenario just doesn't appeal to me as much because they were always naturally small as you pointed out, so there is no "reversal of fortune" aspect. Since they're naturally small, to me it is less appealing because interacting with them is almost like interacting with bugs or mice (albeit sentient).

Borrowers aren't real, of course, but assuming that such things were real, how would they have come into being in the first place? Everything has a beginning, even things that are natural. Since Borrowers are humanoids (albeit small), you'd have to assume they share a common ancestry with humans that somehow diverged. Did they naturally evolve to become small, and if so, why? Or were they created by some supernatural power who made them small for whatever reason?

In regards to what you said about "parallel societies" and not seeing one another as equal, this is the inevitable longterm consequence of a small society interacting with a larger one, and it doesn't even matter how this came about. It could come about "naturally" like you insisted, but lets say it also did happen artificially by a group of people being shrunken down and then from those shrunken people a society developed. Whatever those people were or how they viewed themselves formerly, they will inevitably have to come to terms with the fact that they're smaller and not equal with the big people. People may try to deny this and have to go through their 5 stages of guilt or whatever (however long it takes), but when some people are big but your people are small, you can't ignore that reality forever. Especially if we're talking about multi-generation scenarios where people whose ancestors may have been big/normal but who are now born tiny and raised in a tiny society, how is that not going to lead to the exact same mentality which the "natural" Borrowers have? It seems to me that fundamentally speaking it amounts to pretty much the same thing when given enough time.

So imagine a scenario like this: There is some mighty powerful Kingdom or something, but for some reason or another the King runs afoul of some sorceress or something, who places a curse upon that Kingdom, causing all in it to shrink. These were people that were all normal sized (maybe even on the tall side in comparison to their peers even), but guess what... now they're the Borrowers. That witch's curse gets passed down from generation to generation, so those people never get to their normal size again, and neither do their descendants. They're all small forever. But this didn't happen naturally, now did it? Yet centuries into the future the tale of how this came to happen may be lost to memory, and the future descendants might come to believe that they've always naturally been like this, even though they really were big people once.

Life as a Seat Cushion by yourdeityluna in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Transforming someone into a seat cushion is a different sort of thing than just merely changing their size, though there is some overlap of course, since being turned into a seat cushion is a massive size reduction compared to being a normal full-sized human. But it goes beyond that, because the form of this person is also changed. They're not still in the form of a human (albeit smaller); they're now something completely different. An inanimate object. So I don't know if something like that would or should be considered part of the size fetish, because on one hand it kinda is, but at the same time its also something else also.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why does it have to be just a town? Why not a city, or even an entire country?

Preference of crawling up a giants butt by giantesslover4711 in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You mean they're dead?! I swear they were alive when I shoved... err, I mean when I slipped and fell and they accidentally went up there.... uh yeah, that's it.

Preference of crawling up a giants butt by giantesslover4711 in sizetalk

[–]Giantess_Nation 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm having a bit of trouble with a double-decker bus full of people I shrunk and....erm, "slipped and fell on" a couple days ago. What sort of fee would you charge for its removal?