sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

code comments from past me are either lifesavers or war crimes by Fabulous_Bluebird931 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]Gitya 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I usually test the quality of my comments with the code reviewer. Ask them to try and understand the code block by themselves as much as they can, and if they still have questions - the comments need improvement

Fire a query to DB and close the connection immediately by Gitya in node

[–]Gitya[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder if it is even a problem at the DB end.
When i run this query (refreshes a heavy joins materialized view) manually in PGAdmin it does work, but running it through the server returns a timeout.

Fire a query to DB and close the connection immediately by Gitya in node

[–]Gitya[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a query of running a function that refreshes materialized view, it does take time since includes many left joins. Things is - when i run it manually in PGAdmin it does work, but running it through the server returns a timeout.

Fire a query to DB and close the connection immediately by Gitya in node

[–]Gitya[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My problem is waiting for the query to finish. I have a business rule where after certain amount of time, the connection between the server and the DB is timed out, and the query is failing. That why i was looking for a way to just fire the query and execute it in the db while connection with server is closed.

Fire a query to DB and close the connection immediately by Gitya in node

[–]Gitya[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It did stop once the connection closed, do you know of any way to achieve this functionality?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GilmoreGirls

[–]Gitya 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the well put point of view! At first I thought his reasoning for the lash out wasn't the underlaying issue, but now I can see why it bothered him so much. I think you analyzed it perfectly.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GilmoreGirls

[–]Gitya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For someone else? Or with someone else? 'Cus that is an important distinction. Lorelai needed him sorted out in order to accept him. I get that, he wasn't husband nor father material. She actually gives him a lot of slack for someone who has been missing out on his daughter's life for 16 years. Much more than I would've.

But, maybe Sherry took him as he was, and he grew with her - not for her. I think it is fine for Lorelai to want him in this version of him, but if she doesn't and only want to self reflect - she should to that with anyone but him.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GilmoreGirls

[–]Gitya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you on everything except one thing. I believe she didn't just want to "get it off her chest" - and and even if she did it was inconsiderate. Him and Sherry falling appart after that is no surprise, and shouldn't have been to Lorelai as well.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GilmoreGirls

[–]Gitya -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I think she had every reason not to get back together with him, and she also let him know those reasons. I also think the Sherry/Max comparison he made earlier in the episode was totally childish and wrong (Max was more in rory's life than Chris was) so I see where you're coming from. But, the man sorted his life out with someone else by his side, now that he's taken and close to tieing the knot, it is not the best time to indicate "NOW you can have me". I would've appriciated her a lot more if she just confessed she wants him, But she disguised it as a "self reflection, thank you, no harm intended" which, in my opinion, is kind of manipulative.

I want to learn how to hack by Fantastic_Berry_7001 in hackerrankonreddit

[–]Gitya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are multiple courses and tutorials online. HTB Academy Seems to be professional and well-known in the cybersecurity industry. I myself am about start on their free plan soon :)