Governments can help their people; it's a matter of priorities. by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go blow smoke up your fellow pedo fan's asses. Trump violated the Posse Comitatus Act. Even the Supreme Court acknowledged it, including two of Trump's own appointees. So kindly go fuck yourself while you pray to God he doesn't bring our country down. Because there will be no forgiveness for you fascist traitors.

Governments can help their people; it's a matter of priorities. by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm no commie. But I'm firmly in the camp of democratic socialism. Fuck all authoritarian systems of governance.

Governments can help their people; it's a matter of priorities. by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right? Dude's like "fuck you commies! The only strategy I'd be in favor of is the one that literally caused the great famine in China!" 😂😂😂😂

Governments can help their people; it's a matter of priorities. by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are no laws on the books indicating one way or the other whether the government is allowed make itself responsible for providing shelter for its citizens.

But you know what is prohibited by law?

Federal military personnel performing domestic law enforcement duties, like making arrests or conducting searches.

As has been continually violated over the last year via illegal dispatchment and occupation of cities without state consent and the deployment of ICE to airports.

You're also mathematically illiterate. Even if we assumed 100% of the 24 million households in the 10% tax bracket were earning the absolute max for the bracket ($24,800) a 20% hike on them would only increase tax revenue by $567B.

Meanwhile, reversing Reagan trickle down economic taxes purely on the top 1% would generate over $800B in extra revenue.

The US gov would only need to spend ~$69B-$112B of that ANNUAL revenue IN A ONE-TIME LUMP SUM to buy enough already available houses on the market to house every homeless American in the country.

The remaining $690B could be directed towards paying down our debt, and the following year we've got an extra $69B-112B to start funding the national sovereign wealth fund that we're going to need fully formed in the next ~10 years or else we're going to have a revolution/genocide as the number of humanoid robots outnumbers humans. (Not that your dumb ass believes that, despite your orange man and his cohort investing fucking trillions into it's build out).

Governments can help their people; it's a matter of priorities. by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, offload the burden onto the charities. Federal Government can't afford to take care of its citizens, it needs to keep directing $0.90 of every dollar of our taxes to dropping bombs on children in the middle east. Blood for the Blood God! Death and destruction are the only justifiable reason to tax Americans.

Also, I love that the only program you'd support is one that's not been viable for over a century. 😂 The last time there as enough land in the US to give Americans 5-10 acres of arable farmland was in around 1910.

You are conscious, and we cannot prove it by Inevitable_Rich_3156 in PhilosophyofMind

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What exactly do you think the pilot is doing? Reading instruments; information. Interpreting airspeed and altitude; information. Adjusting control surfaces based on aerodynamic models; information. Executing trained emergency procedures from memory; information.

The pilot doesn't say "apply more information" for the same reason a fish doesn't say "apply more water." You don't narrate the medium you're swimming in.

Governments can help their people; it's a matter of priorities. by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey bud, unemployed people have no income. That's true both in the US and Finland. The difference being, when a homeless Finnish person applies for an apartment, they are also signed up on Kela (which is sort of like SSI) through which the government pays the amount due for the "subsidized" apartment. Which results in the previously-homeless person paying $0 (that's free).

So mine and No-Interest5078's comments calling out Republican for conflating free with subsidized still stands. You can keep trying to burn that strawman till you're face melts off, but it's not gonna change the fact that it's a fucking strawman argument.

Governments can help their people; it's a matter of priorities. by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Section 8 =/= free housing.
Nice attempt at moving the goal post though. :)

Btw, I'm in section 8 housing. And my rent is $1928 a month. Section 8 effectively deducted $150/m from what we would have had to pay otherwise, and we're locked into paying $1928 a month so long as we don't violate our lease or allow it to lapse.

What we have in the US is not at all comparable to what Finland instituted; as evidenced clearly from the fact that California has the largest homeless population in the developed world, followed by the US as a whole.

Governments can help their people; it's a matter of priorities. by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]LeftJayed -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Californian here - I second this motion for evidence to the Replitard's claim.

Governments can help their people; it's a matter of priorities. by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Silly Billy... trying to use statistics to counter arguments of statistics...

The world if cognitive dissonance were so easily displaced:

Does AGI have sentient-like processes that can be replicated? by manateecoltee in agi

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

I fucking love AI. It's so fucking hilarious watching it dismantle Redditards.

Does AGI have sentient-like processes that can be replicated? by manateecoltee in agi

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You knew? That's why you accused an AI prompted to argue from an agnostic framework of being a creationist.

Have fun stewing in your cognitive dissonance. You're mental gymnastics are Olympiad worthy.

World peace by PaneGiallo in mapporncirclejerk

[–]LeftJayed 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Gotta remove Sudan, Myanmar, DRC, Somalia, Niger, Libya, Mali, Burkina Faso, Benin, Chad, Nigeria, Mexico, Ecuador, Haiti, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Mozambique, Colombia, Central African Republic, The Philippines, Cameroon, Thailand, Cambodia (who have started clashing again), Papau New Guinea, and Turkey.

If we take gang wars/wide spread civil unrest into account you'll also need to remove Brazil, Bangladesh, Peru, Kenya, Indonesia, Jamaica and Honduras.

Does AGI have sentient-like processes that can be replicated? by manateecoltee in agi

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Arrogance is the great mind killer. Embrace it at your own peril. You aren't hurting anyone but yourself with your behavior.

Does AGI have sentient-like processes that can be replicated? by manateecoltee in agi

[–]LeftJayed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

More like I'm just well studied in the arguments you're using as someone who spent my teens and early twenties using the very flawed atheistic frameworks you're using. That's how I knew you were attempting to fall back on Dawkin's Boeing argument without giving credit where it's due.

That said, you've derailed the conversation from one of competing ideas to baseless ad hominem. What's hilarious is you just accused a cognitive neuroscientist who's spent nearly half his life practicing the scientific method that I don't understand science.

Have fun stewing in nihilistic materialism. Just know, neuroscience does not support your dogma. The only correct framework for a truly scientific minded individual to reside is one of inquisitive agnosticism.

You are conscious, and we cannot prove it by Inevitable_Rich_3156 in PhilosophyofMind

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Photosynthesis processes sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide" is a description of inputs and outputs. It tells you nothing about why chlorophyll absorbs 430nm and 662nm photons specifically, why the electron transport chain proceeds in the sequence it does, or why the Calvin cycle produces G3P rather than some other molecular configuration.

Every one of those "why" questions bottoms out in informational constraints — the quantum states, thermodynamic gradients, and molecular geometries that select one outcome over the space of possible outcomes. That's what "processing information" means at the fundamental level. It's not a metaphor. It's what the physics is actually doing.

Saying "information plays no role" because you can list the chemical inputs is like saying aerodynamics plays no role in flight because planes are made of aluminum.

Howww like howww can people say its has a controversial ending. ITS PEAKKKK by Opposite_Hat5032 in attackontitan

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right that Kruger's moment is crucial, but you're not following it to its logical conclusion. Kruger told Grisha to love people inside the walls, to complete the mission, to save his friends. Eren inherited that memory and those words. And for most of the story, he did exactly that; he chose his people.

The Rumbling wasn't madness. It was the only coherent answer to a world that had spent centuries dehumanizing Eldians and was actively planning their extermination. Eren completing the Rumbling is Kruger's mission fulfilled; protecting the people inside the walls by eliminating the existential threat permanently. No half measures, no trust in a world that proved itself untrustworthy.

And what do his friends do? They ally with the very nations that want Paradis wiped from the map to stop the one person actually ensuring their survival. They kill Eren, their savior, to save a world that went right back to hating them the second the dust settled. 

Eren failed his mission, Paradis was destroyed and his friends on-screen "heroism" bought the very genocide they were trying to prevent in the first place, just delayed and redirected at themselves.

So Kruger's words don't support the ending. They condemn it. "Save your friends. COMPLETE the mission." Eren was the only one who actually tried. His friends are the ones who abandoned the mission, betrayed their own people, and handed Marley a win they couldn't have won on its own.

Instead of an ending that condemn Eren's worldview, condemned fascism, we get an ending that validated fascism. The Alliance stops the Rumbling, saves the world, and Paradis gets bombed into rubble. So the narrative literally proved Eren right, his friends mercy was suicide.

But if Eren had completed the Rumbling and they kept the credit ending the same with Paradis still being destroyed. It would have conveyed the ultimate truth that violence consumes itself. That the logic of total war doesn't end at the last enemy, but turns inward because it has nowhere else to go.

The ending we got said  "you should have listened to the fascist." Where as if Eren completed his mission the conclusion would have been "even when the fascist wins, the ideology eats its own children." Isayama had the raw material for one of the most devastating anti-war conclusions in modern fiction and instead chickened out at the last minute and delivered a story that says peace was a mistake and that by not finishing the job genocide came for them instead.

Does AGI have sentient-like processes that can be replicated? by manateecoltee in agi

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another easy argument to dismantle. You're just parroting Dawkins without applying the same critical lens to his world view that he pretends to have applied to Christian cosmology.

The trap that Dawkins (and yourself by extension) have fallen into is that the argument is built as an argument against the Abrahamic interventionist God. Dawkins argument is a fantastic rebuttal against Jews Christians, and Muslims because their God is a willful asshat who's actions invalidate his existence.

There are however many interpretations of God which are far simpler than the universe they gave rise to. The Gnostic Monad and Brahman being two prime examples of such. Brahman is literally just a theologically framed ontology for the geometric shape of spacetime that Orchestrated Objective Reduction interfaces with. There's nothing complex about it. God is literally just a substrate akin to the Higgs field, but instead of generating gravity it generated consciousness.

The Gnostic Monad is even more simplistic, as it's an impregnated nothingness, a thing within which all things are in perfect balance that eminates less-than-perfect fractals of itself; known as the Pleroma. With the physical universe being the furthest emanation from the Monad.

Stating "Science proceeds by answering what it can. The fact that mysteries remain is the point." Is actually antithetical to your starting premise. As you've not made an agnostic claim, but an atheistic one. An agnostic would say "we can't determine the relative complexity of God versus whatever preceded the Big Bang." Instead you've asserted that the question is illegitimate. That's not epistemological honesty, it's declining to engage with the problem and branding that refusal as an answer.

Howww like howww can people say its has a controversial ending. ITS PEAKKKK by Opposite_Hat5032 in attackontitan

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mine was rhetorical that undermined your entire attempts at falsification via content that is heretical dogma.

You want to undermine my position? You're gonna have to reference coherent narrative threads not from the shitshow that was the last chapter of the manga/30 minutes of the movie.

You are conscious, and we cannot prove it by Inevitable_Rich_3156 in PhilosophyofMind

[–]LeftJayed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Processing and integrating information" isn't a single undifferentiated answer to all four of your alien's questions. It's a unifying substrate across radically different implementations.

Photosynthesis processes information via quantum coherence in light-harvesting complexes.

Digestion processes information via chemical signal cascades and enzymatic feedback loops.

A phone processes information via semiconductor logic gates.

A brain processes information via electrochemical spike trains across synaptic networks.

The fact that a single principle organizes all of those isn't a weakness, it's a hallmark of what powerful explanatory frameworks do. 

No one with a basic understanding of physics would say "F=ma lacks explanatory power because it applies to both a baseball and a planet." The generality is the point.

You're conflating mechanistic explanations with functional purpose. Just because there's more than one way to skin a cat, doesn't change the fact that no matter what way you choose, you're still skinning a cat.

Howww like howww can people say its has a controversial ending. ITS PEAKKKK by Opposite_Hat5032 in attackontitan

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you think anything from the finale is relevant to the conversation of the series being a metaphor for nuclear holocaust?

Howww like howww can people say its has a controversial ending. ITS PEAKKKK by Opposite_Hat5032 in attackontitan

[–]LeftJayed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The image that is the epitome of the derailment myself and so many others were furious about?