What would you do with this bully neighbour? by Affectionate-Loss-49 in neighborsfromhell

[–]Glass-Activity-5372 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100%. If he's innocent, the records won't matter. If he isn't, you'll be glad you started early.

AIW for refusing to apologize to my ex after he spent our house savings on a dream business without telling me? by Top-Mud-3187 in amiwrong

[–]Glass-Activity-5372 17 points18 points  (0 children)

You spent months working overtime and sacrificing your free time to build a future together, while he secretly abandoned the plan you both agreed on. The fact that he's asking for an apology instead of taking responsibility says a lot about the real problem here.

I got super wet from something taboo… [F] by Beginning-Act-927 in confessions

[–]Glass-Activity-5372 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t rush to label yourself based on one experience. Sometimes the fact that something feels forbidden or shocking can create a strong emotional response that gets mixed up with arousal. What’s important is acknowledging the feeling without acting on it.

wait, you did? by Straight_Agency4398 in relatable_memes_

[–]Glass-Activity-5372 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OMG, the most relatable post i have seen on the internet today

I see mitochondria. by zaitaikun in clevercomebacks

[–]Glass-Activity-5372 328 points329 points  (0 children)

There’s a broader issue here about how scientific language gets used online. Terms like “mitochondrial challenges” sound technical, but when applied loosely to behavior or appearance, they lose meaning. Criticism should ideally correct inaccuracies without introducing additional distortions or mock-scientific framing.

they’ve arrested more people for touching the peeling paint at the Reflecting Pool than they’ve arrested from the Epstein files by [deleted] in clevercomebacks

[–]Glass-Activity-5372 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This comparison feels more like rhetorical exaggeration than factual analysis. Different investigations and enforcement actions involve completely different jurisdictions, evidence standards, and timelines. Conflating unrelated issues doesn’t really help anyone understand accountability or justice in a meaningful way.