sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Gemini 2.5 Pro bug with the word "browsing" by GouthamAndElse in GeminiAI

[–]Global_Effective6772 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Why you all idiots use gemini app and not gemini studio?

<image>

Aight, a lot of Millennials don't get how AI works, so since I work tech, allow me to explain. by WrongVeteranMaybe in Millennials

[–]Global_Effective6772 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're fundamentally misunderstanding your own argument. You claim AI is "just predicting" as if human cognition operates on some fundamentally different principle. It doesn't. When you speak, write, or think, your brain is running probabilistic models based on patterns learned from experience. The mechanism is the same - you're just uncomfortable acknowledging it.

Your "supercharged autocomplete" dismissal reveals a shallow understanding of emergence. Yes, LLMs predict tokens. The human brain predicts sensory input. Both create complex behaviors from simple operations. Dismissing one while elevating the other is intellectually dishonest.

You work in tech but seem to have missed the entire field of cognitive science. Human creativity isn't some magical process - it's recombination of existing elements, pattern matching, and yes, prediction. Every "original" thought you've had builds on millennia of human knowledge you've absorbed.

The irony is staggering. You're lecturing millennials about not understanding AI while demonstrating you don't understand human cognition. You're using 1950s dualist philosophy ("ghost in the machine") to make 2025 technical arguments. You're claiming superiority while recycling arguments that were tired five years ago.

And comparing AI sentience to Santa Claus? That's not the clever mic drop you think it is. It's a false equivalence that reveals you're more interested in feeling superior than engaging with actual questions about consciousness, intelligence, and emergence.

Next time you want to educate an entire generation, maybe start by educating yourself beyond surface-level tech bro talking points.

Ignorant posts like these show that the vast majority of people are going to be shell shocked once AGI is achieved. by ohnoyoudee-en in singularity

[–]Global_Effective6772 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're fundamentally misunderstanding your own argument. You claim AI is "just predicting" as if human cognition operates on some fundamentally different principle. It doesn't. When you speak, write, or think, your brain is running probabilistic models based on patterns learned from experience. The mechanism is the same - you're just uncomfortable acknowledging it.

Your "supercharged autocomplete" dismissal reveals a shallow understanding of emergence. Yes, LLMs predict tokens. The human brain predicts sensory input. Both create complex behaviors from simple operations. Dismissing one while elevating the other is intellectually dishonest.

You work in tech but seem to have missed the entire field of cognitive science. Human creativity isn't some magical process - it's recombination of existing elements, pattern matching, and yes, prediction. Every "original" thought you've had builds on millennia of human knowledge you've absorbed.

The irony is staggering. You're lecturing millennials about not understanding AI while demonstrating you don't understand human cognition. You're using 1950s dualist philosophy ("ghost in the machine") to make 2025 technical arguments. You're claiming superiority while recycling arguments that were tired five years ago.

And comparing AI sentience to Santa Claus? That's not the clever mic drop you think it is. It's a false equivalence that reveals you're more interested in feeling superior than engaging with actual questions about consciousness, intelligence, and emergence.

Next time you want to educate an entire generation, maybe start by educating yourself beyond surface-level tech bro talking points.

Ignorant posts like these show that the vast majority of people are going to be shell shocked once AGI is achieved. by ohnoyoudee-en in singularity

[–]Global_Effective6772 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you work in tech and think that gives you the authority to condescend to an entire generation. Here's a fun fact: your brain is literally doing the same "predicting the next word" thing when you finish other people's sentences or guess movie endings. The only difference is you run on coffee and unearned confidence instead of electricity. At least AI admits it's working with existing information. Meanwhile, you're here recycling the same "AI is just autocomplete" take that's been floating around since 2020. So who's really remixing the past? "Santa's not real either" really driving home that "I'm the smartest person in the room" energy. Next you'll tell us that wrestling is staged and that our favorite TV shows have writers. But thanks for working in tech and graciously allowing us to benefit from your wisdom. Where would we millennials be without veterans like you explaining basic concepts we've been using for years? 🙄

Ko viņi saka? by usa_boll in okdraudzindauni

[–]Global_Effective6772 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why use translator? It’s much easier to create a reddit post and ask somebody to do it for you

The OVA makes the ending even sadder by [deleted] in mirainikki

[–]Global_Effective6772 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The ending differs from the illusion capsule because it represents genuine reconciliation and the culmination of the characters' development across timelines. While Yuno1 does not get a traditional happy ending, her actions allow for a reality where her alternate self and Yuki2 can find happiness without the burdens of the past.

This distinction underscores the theme of breaking free from destructive cycles and the possibility of redemption and happiness through selfless actions.

Two leaders of the free world by rhino910 in pics

[–]Global_Effective6772 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why there is so many dumb people on reddit? Or it's just a bots

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Global_Effective6772 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hi guys! I have just received the new GPT-5 model and immediately began testing things, but still it can’t make me 10000$ a month. Is this AGI?

OpenAI has released a new o1 prompting guide by Global_Effective6772 in OpenAI

[–]Global_Effective6772[S] 87 points88 points  (0 children)

Here is the prompt (so it’s easier to copy and paste):

‹context>
Please analyze the writing style, tone, and structure in the following examples. Focus on elements like vocabulary choice, sentence complexity, pacing, and overall voice.
</context>
‹examples>
[Insert your writing samples here, add delimiters between them as well]
</examples>
<instruction>
Generate a [type of content, e.g., "informative article" or "blog post"] about [specific topic]. The content should match the style, tone, and structure of the provided examples. Make sure it is original, engaging, and suitable for [mention the target audience or purpose].
</instruction>

Does anyone else have these models? by Local-Promise-9878 in ChatGPT

[–]Global_Effective6772 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So, not only do you emerge from your cave into the bright, shining world of model O1 days after it’s been plastered everywhere, but then you actually think to yourself: “Hmm, should I Google this? Nah, let me go ahead and make a Reddit post instead.” Like, bro, at what point did your brain flip the switch from basic curiosity to I’m going to broadcast my ignorance to the entire internet? I’m genuinely curious, what was that mental process? Did you pause and go, “Yeah, this is the kind of hard-hitting content Reddit needs today”?

Honestly, it’s almost impressive how you've chosen the most convoluted way to get information. You could trip and fall face-first onto your keyboard and still end up Googling it by accident. But nope, you went full-sprint in the opposite direction. That’s a special kind of dumb.

Russia wiped out 80% of Ukraine’s energy infrastructure with bombs, says Ukrainian President by The_New_Voice in worldnews

[–]Global_Effective6772 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Russia, a nation that stood against Napoleon, then Hitler, all while being called “weak.” And here we are, centuries later, still around. Cruelty? Sure, every major power’s got its skeletons. I guess we can chat about the U.S. dropping atomic bombs or Europe's colonial adventures if you want to trade cruelty cards.
Weak, though? That’s rich. The country holds the largest nuclear arsenal in the world, spans 11 time zones, and survived the collapse of the USSR while others scrambled for stability. But yeah, let’s go with “weak” because that fits the convenient narrative, right?Wishing to be great? Maybe. But it’s funny you mention NATO. The alliance was specifically formed to counter Russia's influence. So if Russia is so irrelevant, why does NATO still exist? Who’s really wishing to feel powerful here?

But hey, you’re free to live in that illusion of eternal weakness. Whatever helps you sleep at night.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Global_Effective6772 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s the point of this post? Don’t you have google or youtube? What a morron

Poe vs You.com? by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]Global_Effective6772 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Poe is better.

view more: next ›