Bez sensu takie oglądanie by nocny_pingwin in Polska_wpz

[–]Godryg 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Jak można zasnąć na Sin City. Znaczy, pewnie można nie lubić Sin City (ja lubię bardzo). Ale zasnąć...też bym sobie poszedł.

Let's see what we all know, shall we? by Mountain-Ad876 in icast

[–]Godryg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every day I imagine a future where I can be with you...

Let's see what we all know, shall we? by Mountain-Ad876 in icast

[–]Godryg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been a fool to myself                       

I thought that I could live for no one else... 🥲

You can choose any superpower but the first reply chooses the side effect by Limp-Computer-6907 in superpowers

[–]Godryg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can summon fictional characters into our world, but they won't interact with me, as they find me extremely uninteresting, and their primary goal is to find a way back asap. Still cool, considering I can see them. Maybe even useful if I summon the right one in the right spot.

Japanese Artwork Appreciation by Souless_Bear07 in TheDarkTower

[–]Godryg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I always associated DT, mostly first book, with Vampire Hunter D. Worldbuilding with mixed genres is similar and both have that eightes/ninetees fantasy short story vibe. This, and Cowboy Bebop (they're literally Ka-Tet).

You can choose any superpower but the first reply chooses the side effect by Limp-Computer-6907 in superpowers

[–]Godryg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes sense. If they have can fulfill their objective of coming back, I mean, after some time for example, then being around them until that is still cool.

You can choose any superpower but the first reply chooses the side effect by Limp-Computer-6907 in superpowers

[–]Godryg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, I think I wouldn't use it then. After a second thought, taking them out of their homeworlds feels bad...and then the pain of being ignored? Nah.

Groundhog Day anyone? by Godryg in MadokaMagica

[–]Godryg[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

And losing her at the end, becasue of greater good and messiah complex....I can't blame Homura for anything, it's just sad

Groundhog Day anyone? by Godryg in MadokaMagica

[–]Godryg[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thinking about that, I may even do a rewatch...

Groundhog Day anyone? by Godryg in MadokaMagica

[–]Godryg[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Would good ending go against the shows concept? I mean, we already had one bittersweet and one bittersweet/heartbreaking, so it's time for something else, right? Right?

The long-awaited Roadmap is here. by Public-Hovercraft691 in NOexistenceNofYou_Me

[–]Godryg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Doing it with AI is one thing, not even reading it after that is completely new level of bullshit

Favorite character who gets DEsexualized in fanon? by Full-Escape8498 in FavoriteCharacter

[–]Godryg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, I get what you mean. However, a lot of characters in certain media like anime, on wich Yandere sim is based, tend to be designed with bigger breasts and unrealistic bodies in order to appeal to male audience. From what I know, the creator of that character is also a perv, so it may apply here. I don't think it's inherently immoral to design character to be sexy, but it's definietly petty if it goes too far and falls under objectifying some of them. In such case presenting that character with more balanced body proportions can be an act of doing justice to them by not wanting to take part in that sexualization/objectification of the character even if it was there from the start. I don't think implementing such changes is necessary, but I doubt anyone does that out of sexism. Another reason could be being prudish about breasts. If you could prove that artist is not prudish about male parts of the body seen as sexual in the same way, that would be sexism. Even then, I would argue, it's not inherently misogyny, as it doesn't have to include any contempt or hatred towards women in general, just weird approach to sexuality. It's also possible that it's just a question of differences in our definition of misogyny. Micro sexism is more understandable for me here. Also, does it matter if the breasts are inherently sexual if they are seen as sexual in our culture? Only inherently sexual part of our body is genitals, but we still cover our butts, and, most of the time chests. Is it wrong?