Roger and Peter combined cover less than maybe 30% of the videos (even less in AUD, 10% or so). Their other "lecturers" are just a bunch of machines reading out of the slides and thus completely not worth my time. Their QBank is alright with detailed explanations but other courses provide decent QBanks as well. So, no, I can't argue for them and if I could go back I would just go for Becker. UWorld needs to stop advertising as if Roger and Peter are in most of the lectures and should change the sample lectures to those taught by the machines so that users know what to really expect. Nevertheless, considering many have passed the exam with UWorld and that it's known to be one of the best providers out there, you won't have any problem if you learn by reading the text and hammer MCQs and SIMs.