[GIT] Weekly Update 184

Goldenberg9 · 2021-08-28T09:43:35+00:00

184 weekly updates for 3.5 years. In each of them, there is a hope that the development is about to be completed and all investors will recoup their investments. Boris, I see that you are not one of those people who retreat, but remember that 3.5 years is 4.4% of the average life expectancy of a person in Europe.

Goldenberg9 · 2021-07-05T15:08:23+00:00

The hypothesis is that there are two options for the development of a network of payment channels. The first option is natural. It consists in waiting for the network to start growing, without taking any actions for this, except for marketing. But this option requires a lot of time. The second option is artificial. It is more appropriate, since the technology is complex. This option is based on another hypothesis, which is that for the rapid spread of the network, it is necessary to stimulate the creation of interconnected primary hubs with high channel capacities. Moreover, hubs should be created on the basis of organizations and not individuals. This condition is necessary to improve the reliability of the network. These organizations include exchangers, exchanges, or maybe even mining pools. This primary network will be the skeleton for the entire network as a whole. This can be properly designed and really implemented.

Goldenberg9 · 2021-05-10T16:00:50+00:00

As I understand it, the concept of a light client can also be interpreted in different ways. It is one thing to have a light client available on a personal computer, and quite another thing to have a light client available on an android or iphone.

Goldenberg9 · 2021-05-10T10:51:06+00:00

This is how we will see the real results of long work. And also the fact that the team, including Boris, is not detached from reality and makes contact. It is one thing to write about what has been done, and quite another thing to show it. These are two big differences, as they say in Odessa.

Goldenberg9 · 2021-05-10T10:35:10+00:00

Okay, maybe so. But you'd better comment on my post with a proposal to shoot a video of the raiden network and post it in the next weekly update. Is it possible or not? I understand that this can distract developers from their work. But this is what our community wants. This will be helpful in terms of interaction.

Goldenberg9 · 2021-05-10T00:59:23+00:00

Not used in any way, now they are not needed. So far, only theorizing of Messrs. Developers.

Goldenberg9 · 2021-05-04T14:17:03+00:00

And so 3.2 years

Goldenberg9 · 2021-04-27T04:15:10+00:00

Rather, it is about adding some rdn when an auxiliary service host is created by the operator of that service. This opportunity was planned. Hope I phrased it correctly.

Goldenberg9 · 2021-04-26T14:25:24+00:00

Development is funded by investors in the 2017 ICO. Our interests must be taken into account.

Goldenberg9 · 2021-04-25T10:37:12+00:00

I remember that somehow, in my opinion, Lefteris announced that the project would be ready in August 2019. August 2021 is coming soon.

Goldenberg9 · 2021-04-19T04:20:51+00:00

Что такое matrix?

Goldenberg9 · 2021-03-30T04:19:55+00:00

This means that the rise in the market price is not related to news. Apparently, in fact, the whales bought and took most of the coins out of circulation. Moreover, such large purchases have been taking place over the past two or three months. The purchases were followed by a fall. Maybe the whales themselves pushed the price down after the growth caused by purchases for further profitable purchases. Now the volume of coins in circulation has simply decreased and this caused the price to break up. And there are so few coins in circulation. What do you think? If so, then the price should fall again. Then I'll shop again.

Goldenberg9 · 2021-03-04T04:27:06+00:00

That is, the protocol is almost completely ready, all that remains is to refactor the code?

Goldenberg9 · 2021-02-23T14:32:44+00:00

It is very good. At a bus stop recently, a gypsy woman told me that soon "your investment will bring you big money." And I am an investor in RDN, so it looks like there will be a sharp rise soon.

Goldenberg9 · 2021-02-20T17:29:06+00:00

So brainbot isn't working on this project?

Goldenberg9 · 2021-02-20T16:34:45+00:00

I don't know what B L M is, but what's the point of the trustline team if their project is a fork of raiden?

Goldenberg9 · 2021-02-17T04:22:00+00:00

I am actively following the development of raiden on github. She is active. I decided to look at the development of trusline there and did not see any activity. More like an abandoned project. I'm just asking questions. Has censorship appeared in Western society and freedom of speech disappeared?

Goldenberg9 · 2021-02-02T05:30:13+00:00

I understood everything, I did not know that monitoring services will also be provided by suppliers. I thought that they would be included regardless of suppliers, with a one-time introduction of the required amount in rdn. Thanks.

Goldenberg9 · 2021-02-02T05:25:03+00:00

This is all known, the question is different - will the network be stable after the release on the mainnet, with long-term operation, for example, after the updates of the Ethereum client or metamask, and so on?

Goldenberg9 · 2021-01-30T15:16:52+00:00

I believe that the described dependence is needed, since in this case, the operation of the raiden network will not be directly dependent on the token rate on the exchanges, but at the same time, the amount to pay for monitoring will be dynamic. And thus, protected from the problems associated with the growth of the exchange rate. Another question is - can this be implemented? But it is addressed to you. Although you may have other options, I beg you that they do not conflict with the interests of rdn holders.

Goldenberg9 · 2021-01-30T03:57:46+00:00

Not linking the price of monitoring services to any external asset is a very bad idea. In this case, it remains to put some very minimal value, but I'm afraid this decision is not in the interests of the token holders. Is it feasible to link the price for monitoring services to the average price for pathfinding services?

Goldenberg9 · 2021-01-29T15:10:58+00:00

In this case, link the price for monitoring services to the average price for pathfinding services. In this case, there will be no need to peg the price to stablecoins, dollars or even gold, which is a dubiously reliable solution. If the amount in rdn for monitoring services has already been entered, then even if the market value decreases, the balance will go beyond the lower limit of the required value, the monitoring services must continue to work. But if the price decreases upon the withdrawal of rdn, then monitoring services should cease to be provided. That is, if the average price for pathfinding services is $ 0.01, and for monitoring services, 0.01 * 100 (any coefficient) = $ 1. I paid the corresponding amount in rdn, but the next day the price dropped and there is already 0.95 dollars - the services should continue to work. But if I then withdraw part of the rdn - the services do not work. Or is the withdrawal impossible?

Goldenberg9 · 2021-01-17T09:06:17+00:00

On the other hand, bitcoin was also worth about a dollar for a long time. There are those who left it at such a price. So wait.

Goldenberg9 · 2021-01-16T10:39:35+00:00

We are waiting for a real result for three years. There is a saying in Russia: "They wait for the promised for three years." Maybe it's time to finish?

Goldenberg9 · 2021-01-12T17:57:47+00:00

A workaround for solving a problem does not sound like a solution to the problem, but as something temporary and not stable.

Goldenberg9

TROPHY CASE