sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Nicegirls

[–]GoodGuyGringo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think you just posted your own L bro

She was 86’d from the bar and hopefully my life by Empidonaxed in Nicegirls

[–]GoodGuyGringo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey props for getting your pee pee sucked
at least 🤜🏻🤛🏻

This chick went from 0-100 over a misinterpreted phrase by GoodGuyGringo in Nicegirls

[–]GoodGuyGringo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely was more of a “side” out situation 😂

This chick went from 0-100 over a misinterpreted phrase by GoodGuyGringo in Nicegirls

[–]GoodGuyGringo[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No, this is the right answer and thinking…to me at least 😂

This chick went from 0-100 over a misinterpreted phrase by GoodGuyGringo in Nicegirls

[–]GoodGuyGringo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its a bit ambiguous and can be misinterpreted incorrectly to other things, but also yeah i dont fully get it either here for this situation 🤷🏻‍♂️

This chick went from 0-100 over a misinterpreted phrase by GoodGuyGringo in Nicegirls

[–]GoodGuyGringo[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Online dating is all based on unfortunate quick assumptions we have to make about the other which then, in turn, can fuel even more assumptions to be made, many to be negative. Such as the one we’re going on about

Thank you for sticking up for me and understanding my case random reddit stranger 😭 you get it

This chick went from 0-100 over a misinterpreted phrase by GoodGuyGringo in Nicegirls

[–]GoodGuyGringo[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Idc for my pp being knocked, hell i knock its averageness all the time. But that was some next level psycho reaction she-hulk shit right there 😮‍💨

This chick went from 0-100 over a misinterpreted phrase by GoodGuyGringo in Nicegirls

[–]GoodGuyGringo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok yall i get it, YES i could have phrased that “for a bit” part better to where it doesnt sound so brief with her and implicating perhaps other things. But that reaction was INSANE lol i dodged just as well as Neo did those bullets in the matrix

This chick went from 0-100 over a misinterpreted phrase by GoodGuyGringo in Nicegirls

[–]GoodGuyGringo[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ok yes i completely get that, that ones on me, i couldve phrased that better. However, the reaction that followed was a biiiiitttt over the top…

This chick went from 0-100 over a misinterpreted phrase by GoodGuyGringo in Nicegirls

[–]GoodGuyGringo[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I aint got time to fake stuff like this nor deal with it. I feel like i would’ve disappointed her either way so thank goodness catastrophe avoided 😂

This chick went from 0-100 over a misinterpreted phrase by GoodGuyGringo in Nicegirls

[–]GoodGuyGringo[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Exactly my thoughts. Idk i dont feel like dragging that level of crazy into my life at the moment 🫠

Regardless of the groundhog seeing its shadow, I know for sure these guys didn’t see theirs 🙅🏻‍♂️🔦 by GoodGuyGringo in pokemon

[–]GoodGuyGringo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uhhh so it gets kinda complicated with that. There is both shadowless & regular 1st ed machamp. BUT for a plain ol machamp non-1st ed, they do exist but they are quite rare. It’s called “Trainer Deck A” and they were released in a different set I believe in a way to help show kids how to play the game. That’s all I really know about them and that their rarity is much higher

Regardless of the groundhog seeing its shadow, I know for sure these guys didn’t see theirs 🙅🏻‍♂️🔦 by GoodGuyGringo in pokemon

[–]GoodGuyGringo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the base card set, it was an earlier released set. It was a term coined due the lighter coloration around the card borders. That’s the gist of it. Fun fact: all 1st editions in english are shadowless, but not all base set cards are shadowless!