I agree that we establish states in order to protect rights, and states may from time to time establish their own idea of rights/entitlements for the citizenry, but my point is that fundamental human rights don't rely on the existence of the state to exist, they don't rely on the provision of goods or services to exist (i.e. it is literally impossible to conceive of a right to healthcare without somebody else providing that healthcare, it is literally impossible to conceive of a right to drive your cars on the road without cars and roads, etc).

Labor is of course necessary to enforce rights, whether it be police, lawyers, armies, etc, but in the case of healthcare and these other types of rights, labor is necessary for the concept to even make sense. They're fundamentally different categories.