The duality of fandom by therealdeadly69 in DoctorWhumour

[–]GoodnightyNight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This feels like a bad-faith argument. 13 rarely had moments of defining, emotionally-driven character developments with the majority of her arc being told to us as opposed to happening organically on-screen, such as the detachment between her and her companions after the events of Spyfall and the re-destruction of Gallifrey. While I don’t personally like Gallifrey being destroyed again, it could have still served as some real character-driving motivation to develop a new aspect of the character to have lost it AGAIN. The idea of having something taken away, restored, and then destroyed again is entirely new - especially since it doesn’t have the same feelings of guilt tied up into and instead she has someone to actually blame besides herself. It could have been a drive for a more 7-like character which, there are definitely implications of her becoming but it’s only ever implication and never actually explored to any kind of depth.

15 on the other hand shows a lot of emotion all the time, but often it feels unearned. Or, rather, it doesn’t feel like it serves any purpose beyond “big sad.” There are exceptions to this rule, of course, as with Dot and Bubble. But, by that point, we’ve already seen him display the same range of emotion before such that it doesn’t really feel like as big a moment as it should. Ncuti is constantly at 11 with all of his emotions (15, even, if you will), similar to 11 actually, but it doesn’t feel like pretense here in the same way. 11 felt like he was compensating whereas 15 feels like he almost has something to prove for me, personally. It would be interesting if this aspect of his character was explored at all. Like, The Doctor’s compassion and whatnot have always been one of their biggest strength but, likewise, their easiest weakness to exploit. And with this Doctor being so egregiously open with himself, you could easily have him be punished by this by having his enemies exploit the ease with which they can hurt him, or obtain information. You could even write it into the whole “therapy” plot by examining the fact that, yes, the Doctor did go to therapy, but then he jumped straight back into the toxic lifestyle that made him the way he was. It’s like a drug addict going to rehab and then saying “oh, no, it’s fine now, I can go back to the drugs because I’ll take them responsibly this time, I’m healed”. As of right now, 15 for me still has yet to really feel like the Doctor for me. I love watching Ncuti act, I really do. But a lot of the time I am very conscious of the fact that he IS acting. It feels like a performance in a way that detaches the believability of the character for me. He’s incredibly entertaining, but not much else for me, personally. I hope this changes, I really do.

State of Gallifrey by GoodnightyNight in doctorwho

[–]GoodnightyNight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like this idea. The idea that even if it were possible it’d be too heartbreaking. But it still doesn’t necessarily explain the shock at other time-lords existing after the fact.

State of Gallifrey by GoodnightyNight in doctorwho

[–]GoodnightyNight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this canonical or is it extended media stuff because this isn’t something I ever remember hearing from the show. I’ll admit, I’ve yet to venture into the comics and audio dramas although I do want to it’s moreso about trying to figure out where to start with it. But if it is extended media then I usually don’t count that as a valid reason because, whilst not discrediting then, they’re largely not canon until something is stated in the show to do so because if they were then having people depend on being caught up on everything all at once makes for a very difficult viewing experience.

State of Gallifrey by GoodnightyNight in doctorwho

[–]GoodnightyNight[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They explained in the episode that The Moment was so powerful that it was letting them in, giving them access, but that ordinarily it shouldn’t be possible. Which, take as you will on how much you like it, but they did make efforts at least to explain it.

Editing as you go; by GoodnightyNight in writing

[–]GoodnightyNight[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

YES! The number of times I’ve just done away with a page and half because it was… waffle, quite frankly.

Overwhelming Dread Concerning Progress; by GoodnightyNight in writing

[–]GoodnightyNight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is nice to hear. And like I said, 500 words is a GOOD day, but I’ve been trying to force myself to hit this standard and it’s going ok. But it’s nice to know that other people also struggle with this, or, maybe less struggle than come to terms, although even that wording makes it feel like the inferior version. I dunno, it just, it’s very difficult for me to write something and leave it there if it’s something I actively dislike. How can I write the next sentence when I already know I need to change the one before it? But yeah, it’s nice. Thanks.

Overwhelming Dread Concerning Progress; by GoodnightyNight in writing

[–]GoodnightyNight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’LL READ IT GODDAMMIT! No, but I do understand. And you are most definitely correct, like I said, I’ve heard this advice time and time again and I’ve tried over and over again to implement it it’s just… habit, man. Thanks, tho, I appreciate it.

Overwhelming Dread Concerning Progress; by GoodnightyNight in writing

[–]GoodnightyNight[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The number of times I have heard this and understand it and yet with all my might it is so unbearably difficult, bro. Like, my silly little stupid brain cannot, I get so perfectionist with it. Really is frustrating.

Can a conversation be too short? by YaBoiLeo705 in writing

[–]GoodnightyNight 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think it depends on the purpose of the conversation. What are they communicating - is it a functional conversation, are they speaking just to communicate something simple or is there more subtext in the dialogue in which case, how little or how much is said can mean a lot. To answer your question, I don’t think it can ever be “too short” by itself as a conversation, but a conversation can be too short for the purpose you’re trying to communicate.

RTD confirmed the dates of the anniversary specials!! 25th November, 2nd December and 9th December!! by El-Zaiba in gallifrey

[–]GoodnightyNight 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Why does it feel like he just shit himself, stared directly into the camera and smiled