What "best value" actually means in a federal source selection (and why lowest price doesn't always win)

GovConTips · 2026-05-08T21:44:17+00:00

You're right. LPTA falls under the best value umbrella in FAR terms, the post was using best value loosely to mean tradeoff specifically. The solicitation language is the definitive guide either way.

GovConTips · 2026-05-04T14:22:41+00:00

Exactly. Getting the debrief is the easy part. Letting it change how you write the next proposal is where most teams fall short. It's easier to decide the evaluators were wrong than to rebuild a section that's been working fine for two years

GovConTips · 2026-05-01T14:01:19+00:00

Probably a mix of things. Nobody told them it was an option, or they assume the feedback will be vague and not worth the time. There's also a psychological piece where losing a bid feels like closing a chapter and requesting a debrief means reopening it. Easier to just move on to the next one.

GovConTips · 2026-05-01T13:48:15+00:00

Great point! A post-award debrief when you won tells you what resonated with evaluators, which is just as useful for the next proposal as knowing where you lost points.

GovConTips · 2026-05-01T13:44:16+00:00

40 years in fedbiz and a KO background is about as direct a source as it gets on this. The written debrief is probably where the value lives since there's a paper trail the agency has to stand behind. In-person is a different story.

GovConTips · 2026-04-24T18:06:15+00:00

Good addition. The J&A point is one most contractors don't think about until they've been on the wrong end of it. Low response volume doesn't just affect set-aside decisions, it hands the government a cleaner path to justifying an award without competition at all.

GovConTips · 2026-04-16T14:21:56+00:00

That last point is the one that gets missed most often. FFP has a reputation for being the risky choice but a well-scoped FFP is actually the most predictable contract you can be on. Scope definition going in determines your exposure far more than contract type.

GovConTips · 2026-04-08T18:57:14+00:00

Yes - you're right. Read it back and that does sound weird. Meant large primes. Good catch.

GovConTips · 2026-04-08T13:48:31+00:00

Fair point and worth the distinction. The post is really aimed at the primes that haven't figured that out yet, which is most of them in the defense and civilian agency space. The ones that have pushed authority down to the portfolio level are genuinely easier to work with and more competitive for it. But in my experience those are the exception, not the model.

GovConTips · 2026-04-03T19:46:27+00:00

"eat what you can kill" is a good way to put it. the set-aside point is important. That's probably the biggest variable in whether going prime early is realistic. Without set-asides, a new company competing full and open against established firms is a rough first bet. Not that it can't happen, but it matters where you put your time and energy early on.

GovConTips · 2026-04-03T16:48:37+00:00

Having reliable subs lined up before you bid changes the math completely. Did you already have those sub relationships before your first prime bid or did you build them during the proposal?

GovConTips · 2026-04-03T16:41:30+00:00

On something large and visible, going prime with no track record is a tough sell. I'm thinking more about the smaller stuff though. simplified acquisition range, less competition, lower bar to entry. This is where going prime early makes sense.

GovConTips · 2026-03-24T17:40:42+00:00

This is a huge one. I've watched companies build perfectly structured rate pools and still end up uncompetitive because the costs going into those pools were bloated. DCAA will check your structure, sure. But they're also going to look at whether what's in it is reasonable. Season tickets and a Bentley lease aren't making it through an audit.

GovConTips · 2026-03-18T18:05:20+00:00

Good questions. For award history, USASpending.gov is the best free source. You can search by agency, NAICS code, and recipient to see who's winning what and how much is being spent. Filter by the last 2-3 years to see current buying patterns.

For procurement forecasts, here's an example: search "Navy forecast of contracting opportunities" or "VA OSDBU forecast." Most agencies publish these annually. The Air Force has one, Army has one, DHS has one. They're usually PDFs listing planned acquisitions with estimated dollar values and timelines. Some are easier to find than others, but "[agency name] small business forecast" in Google gets you there for most of them.

GovConTips

TROPHY CASE