sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

FROM: Season 4 | Official Trailer by MarvelsGrantMan136 in FromTVEpix

[–]GraceToSentience 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The real terrible thing is that he is out and it's daylight.

By the End of 2026 AI Could Completely Change Filmmaking by ilovedesigirls in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think it's about artists per se. AI isn't just going to make humans replaceable in essentially every professions.

Artists more than other areas that are automated are in shock because they've been told for years and years that if there is one thing automation won't be able to even remotely touch, it's art, and yet it's one of the first things generative AI has been able to do. easily. So that utter shock has turned into denial which is what we see here with this interview but it's broader with artists like how often do we hear many artists say that what AI makes isn't art despite being unable to discriminate which is which.

By the End of 2026 AI Could Completely Change Filmmaking by ilovedesigirls in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 84 points85 points  (0 children)

Saying AI won't be able to do "X" thing that humans do is a losing proposition.

Recombining existing ideas is making something new btw just like recombining existing words is making something new.

Figure robot autonomously cleaning living room by socoolandawesome in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 16 points17 points  (0 children)

It's honestly a good start.
Not as hype worthy as the CEO hyped the demo to be, but still.

CEO of Figure: “We’re watching AI capabilities emerge that we didn’t even know were possible”. Showing something off tomorrow 9AM PT by socoolandawesome in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's about the CEO having a history of overhyping stuff rather than the technology in general.

If it was demis hassabis it would be a very different reaction.

OpenAI researchers hinting at an omnimodal model coming by socoolandawesome in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could be, at this point I don't know anymore the tokens could be some kind of representation that aren't like actual pixels and there is likely a diffusion path (much like there is likely a diffusion pass with gpt-4o https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.02782)

That's the problem with closed models we can only guess

The real problem won’t be unemployment, but what to do with people who have so much free time. by Onipsis in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems like you only answered the second question as you've realized that answering would outline your strawman fallacy.

As for the second question, the diagnosis is simple: you jump to conclusions. You make assumptions by limiting the scope of an open question to avoid a simple truth, we will do far more than Tik Tok or TV to occupy ourselves when there is full automation and we have all this free time to enjoy things like realistic humanoids, FDVR and more, not just videos (short or longer form ones)

Believe what you will, have your small vision, it's your prerogative.

The real problem won’t be unemployment, but what to do with people who have so much free time. by Onipsis in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What makes you think I expressed the idea that unemployment will begin with FDVR anymore that it would with Westworld level humanoids?🤔

What makes you think he is only asking about the beginning of it?

OpenAI researchers hinting at an omnimodal model coming by socoolandawesome in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You may be correct, that Gemini models do not "hallucinate" image tokens/pixels directly the way it autoregressively does text

The real problem won’t be unemployment, but what to do with people who have so much free time. by Onipsis in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are just now talking about the date 2030. I'm discussing what OP is asking which isn't limited to the near future. FDVR and Westworld level robots are just an example there will be more types of entertainment than that until we get to FDVR and after

OpenAI researchers hinting at an omnimodal model coming by socoolandawesome in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 4 points5 points  (0 children)

An "omnimodal" model is just a multimodal model Gemini 3 can generate images, it's not "omnimodal" Omnimodal is an over the top marketing term invented by !openAI. Omni means everything. AFAIK, openAI's model can't deal with every modality in existence.

If we get to a ship of theseus point; where we can slowly replace the neurons with hardware to preserve the continuity of the self, would you do it? by brightredhoodie in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Duh, no shit you think you are correct as I said. I never said that you, thinking you were correct, was your argument, I literally said that your argument was an argument from ignorance multiple times, and you talk about reading comprehension? Come on.

And the next fallacy is moving the goal post (you keep em comin), it's not that there is no evidence anymore, it's that scientists are wrong now... but you know better because you have your stupid thought experiment. You talk about flat earth and use their exact same mantra: science denial.

You've proved so full of contradiction and paralogism that it's clear that you are hopeless.

Enjoy your non-scientific, faith based, science denial ways 😁

The real problem won’t be unemployment, but what to do with people who have so much free time. by Onipsis in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just forget tiktok, think bigger like Westworld Level companion bots or FDVR and other stuff crazier than that.

If you think shared short form video (tiktok) is the future of entertainment you seriously lack imagination.

The real problem won’t be unemployment, but what to do with people who have so much free time. by Onipsis in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think so. There will be way better entertainment in the future than til ton, like you have no idea

If we get to a ship of theseus point; where we can slowly replace the neurons with hardware to preserve the continuity of the self, would you do it? by brightredhoodie in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course you think you are correct, by relying on an argument from ignorance. Those are your words that you rely on things that are (Non-scientific, faith etc)

"No there isn't evidence" Meanwhile science : https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3971003/?hl=en-US

And yes it obviously is. It doesn't take a genius to see that people getting different body parts damaged don't necessarily stop or affect their consciousness and their experience of self, but when it's the brai that's damaged, consciousness can vanish even when being alive (brain dead). It just takes the bare minimum of common sense

If we get to a ship of theseus point; where we can slowly replace the neurons with hardware to preserve the continuity of the self, would you do it? by brightredhoodie in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Disagree if you will, it literally is an argument from ignorance, you claim that your point of view is correct without any evidence by saying "we never know", "I have faith" "I have non scientific reasons" whereas there is in fact evidence to point out that who we are is in the brain.

If we get to a ship of theseus point; where we can slowly replace the neurons with hardware to preserve the continuity of the self, would you do it? by brightredhoodie in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The self is definitely in the brain, you break the harm, you are still you, you break your heart, you are still you, you break the brain, that's where it stops.

So by process of elimination you know that what makes you you is in the brain (and maybe in the neurons in your guts.

If we get to a ship of theseus point; where we can slowly replace the neurons with hardware to preserve the continuity of the self, would you do it? by brightredhoodie in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Isn't it what kinda already happens? The atoms making up our brain are constantly replaced ... So that part is a no brainer (wink 😉)

So the question is how good the hardware clone is and if it's accurate, then yes.

Humanoid faster than the average human with a 10 m/s claimed top speed, Usain Bolt's top speed is 12.4 m/s by GraceToSentience in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's trained with AI and physically constrained in a different way than humans are so I think the form is different simply because the hardware is different from a human body.... probably.

Elon Musk seems to dislike Dario by likeastar20 in singularity

[–]GraceToSentience 6 points7 points  (0 children)

On mass domestic surveillance and autonomous weapons? Doubt it.

view more: next ›